oh, nothing new to a lot of us. just tired of seeing stance noobs post, "how is hellaflush not funtional?" it's purely for style, witch i'm fine with. i do think it look's great w/in reason, but it really get's on my nerves when disillusioned drivers try and use purpose built drift cars as an example of how "functional" the setup on their car is.

 

another thing that get's on nerves is when someone runs their very 1st aggressive setup for like a month or two, then spends the next year looking for an even more aggressive set but talks all kinds of **** on here like their **** don't stink in the mean time since they're such OG-Stance-Masters. oh, and i'm not talking about anyone in Cali either.

 

oh ok gotcha i agree 100% hellaflush will never be functional


and yah troof.org bahah hellaflush makes people go way crazy but it's entertaining isnt it? tp see what some soley for the approval of others

 

entertaining... sometimes, LOL

 

Just looks like 2 people playing ping-pong to me!!

 

so you're saying you would rather put 24"+ chrome wheels and an aston martin front than go the "Hellaflush" look? haha

 

was that levon's first car? in OP pic..

 

dre, check this out.... this is type of garbage that really kills me

 

 

So much misinformation in that post you quoted Mark.

 

i got love for stanced g's too, not crazy about maxed out setups but dudes like that kill the whole scene.

 

It's functional for me...breaks some fckin necks. That's function riiiiiight?

Srsly though, there's is a limit to where lowering the car too low can affect function. First thing to decide though, is what are you trying to obtain? Drift cars vs track vs quarter mile. Totally different.

 

well put Levon

 

yup ding ding

 

Just wanted to point this out.

That guy that said that, HATES stanced cars and drives a fender gapped stereotypical G on volks.

So HE is making a scene that he isn't even part of look bad. He's an idiot (and yes I have already informed him of this)