350Z N/A Project
#47
05-05-2012, 09:28 PM
1. he has a revup
2. the mrev2 alone has slightly better gains than the spacer alone, on a non-rev, the difference is the cost. not twice the gains for twice the price, that's why most non-revs skip it. this info has been posted time and time again, i don't know how all this misinformation stays alive.
2. the mrev2 alone has slightly better gains than the spacer alone, on a non-rev, the difference is the cost. not twice the gains for twice the price, that's why most non-revs skip it. this info has been posted time and time again, i don't know how all this misinformation stays alive.
Here let me explain how to read the chart. I thought it was pretty self explanatory, however I have been proven wrong.:
1) There's a line, (green) which shows the gains for the spacer alone.
2) There's another line (red) with the spacer and MREV2.
3) Look at the difference between the two.
4) Read my post and the post in the link I posted, by Hydrazine, which I copied for you in this thread.
I guess your flawed logic is where you could look at the yellow line to make your conclusion that the MREV2 is useful if you don't intend at getting a spacer at all, however I just bypassed that illogical thought altogether since a reasonable person would get the spacer at less than half the price since it produces nearly the same power and after the spacer, it's obvious that the MREV2 provides nominal gains over the spacer alone on the DE.
Hopefully that's simple enough to understand now. If it isn't, I don't know what is...
1) There's a line, (green) which shows the gains for the spacer alone.
2) There's another line (red) with the spacer and MREV2.
3) Look at the difference between the two.
4) Read my post and the post in the link I posted, by Hydrazine, which I copied for you in this thread.
I guess your flawed logic is where you could look at the yellow line to make your conclusion that the MREV2 is useful if you don't intend at getting a spacer at all, however I just bypassed that illogical thought altogether since a reasonable person would get the spacer at less than half the price since it produces nearly the same power and after the spacer, it's obvious that the MREV2 provides nominal gains over the spacer alone on the DE.
Hopefully that's simple enough to understand now. If it isn't, I don't know what is...
when I go back home I'll post some!
#50
05-06-2012, 10:47 AM
1. he has a revup
2. the mrev2 alone has slightly better gains than the spacer alone, on a non-rev, the difference is the cost. not twice the gains for twice the price, that's why most non-revs skip it. this info has been posted time and time again, i don't know how all this misinformation stays alive.
2. the mrev2 alone has slightly better gains than the spacer alone, on a non-rev, the difference is the cost. not twice the gains for twice the price, that's why most non-revs skip it. this info has been posted time and time again, i don't know how all this misinformation stays alive.
- Yes, it is pretty much useless once you get the spacer as I explained below. If mod a) and mod b) both give the same whp, have the same effects on the car, but mod b) costs 2* as much, why would anybody even consider mod b)?
Here let me explain how to read the chart. I thought it was pretty self explanatory, however I have been proven wrong.:
1) There's a line, (green) which shows the gains for the spacer alone.
2) There's another line (red) with the spacer and MREV2.
3) Look at the difference between the two.
4) Read my post and the post in the link I posted, by Hydrazine, which I copied for you in this thread.
I guess your flawed logic is where you could look at the yellow line to make your conclusion that the MREV2 is useful if you don't intend at getting a spacer at all, however I just bypassed that illogical thought altogether since a reasonable person would get the spacer at less than half the price since it produces nearly the same power and after the spacer, it's obvious that the MREV2 provides nominal gains over the spacer alone on the DE.
Hopefully that's simple enough to understand now. If it isn't, I don't know what is...
1) There's a line, (green) which shows the gains for the spacer alone.
2) There's another line (red) with the spacer and MREV2.
3) Look at the difference between the two.
4) Read my post and the post in the link I posted, by Hydrazine, which I copied for you in this thread.
I guess your flawed logic is where you could look at the yellow line to make your conclusion that the MREV2 is useful if you don't intend at getting a spacer at all, however I just bypassed that illogical thought altogether since a reasonable person would get the spacer at less than half the price since it produces nearly the same power and after the spacer, it's obvious that the MREV2 provides nominal gains over the spacer alone on the DE.
Hopefully that's simple enough to understand now. If it isn't, I don't know what is...
I was posting seriously misleading information and what you're saying is 100% correct. Nobody in their right mind should consider the MREV2 alone when they can get the spacer for similar gains at half the price, especially since once you have the spacer, incremental gains are negigible.
Last edited by RastaManMax; 05-06-2012 at 10:51 AM.
#51
05-06-2012, 01:17 PM
- Question is for a non-revup.
- Yes, it is pretty much useless once you get the spacer as I explained below. If mod a) and mod b) both give the same whp, have the same effects on the car, but mod b) costs 2* as much, why would anybody even consider mod b)?
- Yes, I do recommend the spacer. Who wouldn't for reasons listed below.
Thanks dude. Please don't PM me going forward... Anyways, i'm done with this. It's like arguing with somebody in the special olympics.
- Yes, it is pretty much useless once you get the spacer as I explained below. If mod a) and mod b) both give the same whp, have the same effects on the car, but mod b) costs 2* as much, why would anybody even consider mod b)?
- Yes, I do recommend the spacer. Who wouldn't for reasons listed below.
Thanks dude. Please don't PM me going forward... Anyways, i'm done with this. It's like arguing with somebody in the special olympics.
sorry ur butt hurt but hey, truth can do that, LOL. no point quoting me over and over considering all you did was restate what i said in the first place, thanks for all the research though, hope you learned something. sorry, if bold text misleads you. 
back to business, let's see some updates OP
#56
05-09-2012, 09:41 AM
#60
05-14-2012, 03:40 PM
Just one question. why go with the NA build? in the end you will want more power and want to buy a turbo kit.
You went the same way when i first started. I spent 10k on NA stuff and went for 230 to 276whp. Or spend the 5k on a used turbo kit or a boosted performance kit and get 400whp.
thats just my ..02 cents
You went the same way when i first started. I spent 10k on NA stuff and went for 230 to 276whp. Or spend the 5k on a used turbo kit or a boosted performance kit and get 400whp.
thats just my ..02 cents