Lets go MAVS!
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,557
Likes: 106
From: Dallas, TX

Lets go MAVS! Lakers suck! The official DFW NBA Playoff thread.
They played hard, they executed well, and they won! It feels good to beat the Spurs in 5 games. 
Bring on the Nuggets, looks like its gona be a good hard series against them.

Guys, lets keep the discussion on topic, that is the Mavs. And not any other teams that the Mavs haven't played yet, for ex the Lakers. Ha!

Bring on the Nuggets, looks like its gona be a good hard series against them.

Guys, lets keep the discussion on topic, that is the Mavs. And not any other teams that the Mavs haven't played yet, for ex the Lakers. Ha!
Last edited by syshs; Apr 29, 2009 at 07:24 PM.
Trending Topics
man I don't talk noise like that.. ANYTHING can happen in the playoffs, I didn't expect Boston to be having such a hard time w/ Chicago.. but those boys came to PLAY..
That win utah got against us was a FLUKE man.. I'm still sour about that..
That win utah got against us was a FLUKE man.. I'm still sour about that..
Yea, and the Rondos closed fist slap upside the head of brad miller at the end of regulation should have been a flagrant 2 and a suspension too. He was woozy and needed stitches for christ sake...lol Rondo wasnt even close to the ball. More celtic bias as usual. Im just glad the refs called some good games both ways in the dallas series. Lets hope the refs dont take over the western playoffs as they have in the eastern conference.
yeah.. that was a ragedy play.. Howard didn't even make contact.. rondo got a slip hook in.. wow.. Then dude had to shoot free throws half knocked out and lost the game.. That's busted.
That's because the Mavs as you said.. Did their job.. Good job making it to round 2.. I'm looking forward to actually WATCHING the series.. Mavs vs. Spurs sounded like the most BORING series on TV.
There.. now that my Mavs criteria has been fulfilled..
As posted by Sports Illustrated : (http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/200...ml?eref=si_nba)
"In terms of the criteria that we use to evaluate a flagrant foul penalty one, generally we like to consider whether or not there was a windup, an appropriate level of impact and a follow-through. And with this foul, we didn't see a windup, nor did he follow through. So for that reason we're not going to upgrade this foul to a flagrant foul penalty one."
How can you say there's not follow through here?
There.. now that my Mavs criteria has been fulfilled..
As posted by Sports Illustrated : (http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/200...ml?eref=si_nba)
"In terms of the criteria that we use to evaluate a flagrant foul penalty one, generally we like to consider whether or not there was a windup, an appropriate level of impact and a follow-through. And with this foul, we didn't see a windup, nor did he follow through. So for that reason we're not going to upgrade this foul to a flagrant foul penalty one."
How can you say there's not follow through here?


