DIY: EVAP canister removal for sedan owners
I have a significant update to this thread. Must read for every member who removes the canister.
First off I apologize to anyone who has followed this guide and had problems. There are problems if done improperly like I described in this thread at first. After the box is removed the EVAP system has to be closed under the hood on the passenger side because it will cause a vacuum leak which will alter the air/fuel ratio and also cause the motor to crank longer after sitting for a few hours because the motor will have problems maintaining vacuum at the initial crank because of the leak. Because of the leak, there will also be a SES CEL light for the air/fuel ratio sensors on both banks, 1 and 2. There will also be subtle power surges at wide open throttle across the entire RPM range as the ECU tries to maintain the target air/fuel ratio because of the leak. Probably only noticeable on MT cars.
These are pics of how to close the EVAP system under the hood. There is also no need anymore to run any hoses from the gas tank into the subframe like I had. Simply pulling the hoses off and leaving the gas tank pipe ends open is fine.
At this point there are 0 problem with this mod as long as the EVAP CEL is disabled with Osiris to be able to pass emissions.
More weight can be saved by removing the hardline under the car and all hoses.



First off I apologize to anyone who has followed this guide and had problems. There are problems if done improperly like I described in this thread at first. After the box is removed the EVAP system has to be closed under the hood on the passenger side because it will cause a vacuum leak which will alter the air/fuel ratio and also cause the motor to crank longer after sitting for a few hours because the motor will have problems maintaining vacuum at the initial crank because of the leak. Because of the leak, there will also be a SES CEL light for the air/fuel ratio sensors on both banks, 1 and 2. There will also be subtle power surges at wide open throttle across the entire RPM range as the ECU tries to maintain the target air/fuel ratio because of the leak. Probably only noticeable on MT cars.
These are pics of how to close the EVAP system under the hood. There is also no need anymore to run any hoses from the gas tank into the subframe like I had. Simply pulling the hoses off and leaving the gas tank pipe ends open is fine.
At this point there are 0 problem with this mod as long as the EVAP CEL is disabled with Osiris to be able to pass emissions.
More weight can be saved by removing the hardline under the car and all hoses.




Last edited by Andrei; Oct 30, 2010 at 10:57 PM.
I still don't understand why any of you are going to the trouble of doing this "mod" if you want to even call it that. Taking off a part of the car that was put there for a reason, to "save" weight, just doesn't many any sense to me. None of you are racing your cars, and the amount of weight you're going to be taking off isn't going to be noticeable at all, so the questions remains, why?
Well that's why you cant take on a stock 335i or an E46 M3 and I can. That's also where the differences between me and 90% of the members here begin because I do the absolute best that I can with the car that I got in terms of performance and if it means that I save 4-5 pounds by removing the canister, brackets, hoses, bolts, rear tow hook and hardline, I'll do it.
Again if anyone does not like this mod no one is forcing anybody to do it.
Also another quick update. I blocked off the EVAP system at the throttle body. It's better this way since EVERYTHING can be removed.
Again if anyone does not like this mod no one is forcing anybody to do it.
Also another quick update. I blocked off the EVAP system at the throttle body. It's better this way since EVERYTHING can be removed.
Last edited by Andrei; Nov 1, 2010 at 03:37 PM.
Well that's why you cant take on a stock 335i or an E46 M3 and I can. That's also where the differences between me and 90% of the members here begin because I do the absolute best that I can with the car that I got in terms of performance and if it means that I save 4-5 pounds by removing the canister, brackets, hoses, bolts, rear tow hook and hardline, I'll do it.
Again if anyone does not like this mod no one is forcing anybody to do it.
Again if anyone does not like this mod no one is forcing anybody to do it.
I was just wondering why people would do this, and now I know it's to shead a few lbs for the hell of it, so cool. I got what I was wondering.
I just weighed the canister and hoses I was using. It's 5 lbs just for that. Not counting the hardline, other hoses, rear tow hook, bolts, canister brackets and canister cover it's undoubtedly around 10 lbs+ of weigh savings which is very good.
















Well I removed a lot more than that with other mods. I estimate I'm at 3400lbs even BUT I make additional power with the mods. I estimate over 300++ (325-330+) brake horse power for my Revup sedan at 298bhp stock. Maybe 275-280ish+ at the wheels on a DynoJet. I also have no doubt that I have a better power to weight ration than a E46 M3.
Custom dual 3" exhaust w/ quad tips. Stock exhaust is all gone except stock headers. Saved a lot of weight here and made power.
AAM throttle body spacer
90mm CAI. Just a pipe instead of a Z tube. Felt gains when I installed it.
Oil warmer delete. 5lbs here at least. Heat soak problem solved.
Idle pulley delete. 5lbs + here.
EVAP delete. 10lbs+ here.
Complete coolant bypass. Some weight saved. Heat soak.
Unknown aftermarket clutch/light weight flywheel. A lot of weight saved here.
Custom dual 3" exhaust w/ quad tips. Stock exhaust is all gone except stock headers. Saved a lot of weight here and made power.
AAM throttle body spacer
90mm CAI. Just a pipe instead of a Z tube. Felt gains when I installed it.
Oil warmer delete. 5lbs here at least. Heat soak problem solved.
Idle pulley delete. 5lbs + here.
EVAP delete. 10lbs+ here.
Complete coolant bypass. Some weight saved. Heat soak.
Unknown aftermarket clutch/light weight flywheel. A lot of weight saved here.
Last edited by Andrei; Nov 1, 2010 at 03:35 PM.
Here is the 2005 M3 "Competition Package" I cant justify the price on it for the performance or the price of ownership/parts/maintenance. http://www.insideline.com/bmw/m3/200...w-m3-ever.html I'm topping that now and still for about $10k less.
Key specs.
Base Price: $47,300
Price as Tested: $55,840
Displacement (liters): 3.2
Engine Type: I-6
Horsepower (hp @ rpm): 333 @ 7900
Torque (ft-lbs @ rpm): 262 @ 4900
Curb Weight (lbs): 3415
0 - 60 (sec): 5.5
0 - 75 (sec): 8.0
1/4 Mile (sec @ mph): 13.72 @ 105.36
30 - 0 (ft): 111.85
60 - 0 (ft): 28.34
Key specs.
Base Price: $47,300
Price as Tested: $55,840
Displacement (liters): 3.2
Engine Type: I-6
Horsepower (hp @ rpm): 333 @ 7900
Torque (ft-lbs @ rpm): 262 @ 4900
Curb Weight (lbs): 3415
0 - 60 (sec): 5.5
0 - 75 (sec): 8.0
1/4 Mile (sec @ mph): 13.72 @ 105.36
30 - 0 (ft): 111.85
60 - 0 (ft): 28.34
Andrei always found your posts to be very interesting keep it up! I'm going to do this once when I send my ECU to get flashed.
I removed the wipers all the wiring and the giant fluid canister. The weight in cleaning solution alone had to be about a gallon so ~8.35lbs I think. Overall I'm estimating 13-14lbs.
I was thinking about relocating my battery to the trunk. Would this be beneficial to weight distribution in our sedans? I feel like the rear is really light ( mines gutted with no spare).
I removed the wipers all the wiring and the giant fluid canister. The weight in cleaning solution alone had to be about a gallon so ~8.35lbs I think. Overall I'm estimating 13-14lbs.
I was thinking about relocating my battery to the trunk. Would this be beneficial to weight distribution in our sedans? I feel like the rear is really light ( mines gutted with no spare).
I wouldn't bother relocating the battery. Slightly more weight in the front is beneficial for better acceleration because more weight will shift to the rear during acceleration reducing traction loss.
The 50/50 weight distribution claim BWM makes is just a selling point making people think they buy a superior product compared to say 53,55/47,45 on a G sedan.
The 50/50 weight distribution claim BWM makes is just a selling point making people think they buy a superior product compared to say 53,55/47,45 on a G sedan.
Last edited by Andrei; Nov 5, 2010 at 12:01 AM.
I have not been yet but I am DYING to go. The rear differential bushing is blown and I get EXCESSIVE wheel hop through 1st gear and part of 2nd. I have SPL F/R differential bushings and I am waiting on a friend to move his shop for him to help me with the install, might be this month.
Another issue is the clutch pivot ball which I need to change to a Nismo one and Nismo roller bearing. I also want a 850 TQ rated clutch. I will launch the car at 5-6000rpm on drag radials once I get all that done.
Another issue is the clutch pivot ball which I need to change to a Nismo one and Nismo roller bearing. I also want a 850 TQ rated clutch. I will launch the car at 5-6000rpm on drag radials once I get all that done.
Here is the 2005 M3 "Competition Package" I cant justify the price on it for the performance or the price of ownership/parts/maintenance. http://www.insideline.com/bmw/m3/200...w-m3-ever.html I'm topping that now and still for about $10k less.
Key specs.
Base Price: $47,300
Price as Tested: $55,840
Displacement (liters): 3.2
Engine Type: I-6
Horsepower (hp @ rpm): 333 @ 7900
Torque (ft-lbs @ rpm): 262 @ 4900
Curb Weight (lbs): 3415
0 - 60 (sec): 5.5
0 - 75 (sec): 8.0
1/4 Mile (sec @ mph): 13.72 @ 105.36
30 - 0 (ft): 111.85
60 - 0 (ft): 28.34
Key specs.
Base Price: $47,300
Price as Tested: $55,840
Displacement (liters): 3.2
Engine Type: I-6
Horsepower (hp @ rpm): 333 @ 7900
Torque (ft-lbs @ rpm): 262 @ 4900
Curb Weight (lbs): 3415
0 - 60 (sec): 5.5
0 - 75 (sec): 8.0
1/4 Mile (sec @ mph): 13.72 @ 105.36
30 - 0 (ft): 111.85
60 - 0 (ft): 28.34
I wouldn't bother relocating the battery. Slightly more weight in the front is beneficial for better acceleration because more weight will shift to the rear during acceleration reducing traction loss.
The 50/50 weight distribution claim BWM makes is just a selling point making people think they buy a superior product compared to say 53,55/47,45 on a G sedan.
The 50/50 weight distribution claim BWM makes is just a selling point making people think they buy a superior product compared to say 53,55/47,45 on a G sedan.
Also, if you look at reports done, BMW does have a very close if not perfect weight distribution on most of their cars.
Here you go. http://www.mpt.org/motorweek/reviews/rt2101.shtml Could still be the convertible. I have no idea. http://www.ket.org/tvschedules/episo...a=MOTK++002101
They have a professional driver BTW.
2001 BMW M3
Engine
3.2 liter inline 6 cylinder
Horsepower
333
Torque
262 lb feet
0-60 mph
5 seconds
1/4 mile
13.5 seconds @ 107 mph
60-0 mph
112 feet
EPA Mileage
16 mpg city
24 mpg highway
Also. http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/car/59/BMW-E46-M3.html
Seems they got some inflated numbers.
Power 343 bhp / 256 KW @ 7900 rpm
Torque 365 Nm / 269 ft lbs @ 4900 rpm
BHP/Liter 106 bhp / liter
Power to weight 0.22 bhp / kg
Top Speed 250 km/h / 155 mph
0-60 mph 5.1 s
Well I guess we'll just have to wait and see.
They have a professional driver BTW.
Episode description: Road tests of the BMW M3 coupe and convertible and the Mitsubishi Lancer OZ Rally Edition, plus the first drive of the 2002 Toyota Camry R. [cc]
Engine
3.2 liter inline 6 cylinder
Horsepower
333
Torque
262 lb feet
0-60 mph
5 seconds
1/4 mile
13.5 seconds @ 107 mph
60-0 mph
112 feet
EPA Mileage
16 mpg city
24 mpg highway
Also. http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/car/59/BMW-E46-M3.html
Seems they got some inflated numbers.
Power 343 bhp / 256 KW @ 7900 rpm
Torque 365 Nm / 269 ft lbs @ 4900 rpm
BHP/Liter 106 bhp / liter
Power to weight 0.22 bhp / kg
Top Speed 250 km/h / 155 mph
0-60 mph 5.1 s
Well I guess we'll just have to wait and see.
Last edited by Andrei; Nov 7, 2010 at 08:50 AM.
This is the drive side valve cover venting to atmosphere. Like I said it does not cause any gas smell venting to atmosphere. Usually this has a hose connecting to the intake and it releases unburned gas vapors into the intake but it fouls up the throttle body.
The gas smell after I put the canister back into the subframe was simply because of a bad wideband air/fuel sensor.

The gas smell after I put the canister back into the subframe was simply because of a bad wideband air/fuel sensor.

This is how I fixed it.






