Engine, Drivetrain & Forced-Induction Have Technical Questions or Done Modifications to the G35? Find out the answer in here! (View All Posts)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Project Help, All Motor 500+hp

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jun 17, 2007 | 06:30 PM
  #1  
88G35's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
From: Berwyn, Pa
Project Help, All Motor 500+hp

I am starting to work on my new engine project. I noticed most of the people on this board making big power all have FI setups. I was thinking about doing a big power engine but having it all motor. What do you guys think?? I was looking for atleast 500+hp. Or would it just be better to go FI? Any suggestions/input at all are appreciated!

For those of you who have had or currently have a high hp all motor engine how do you like it?

BTW: Anybody that has a short block they don't need let me know!!


Thanks,
Chris
 
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2007 | 06:37 PM
  #2  
GreenGoblin's Avatar
The goblin resurrection
iTrader: (66)
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 25,863
Likes: 187
From: In my garage
Premier Member

take a look around the site it has been discused before that your the amount of money that you are gonna drop into an all motor setup most go fi and get bigger numbers
 
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2007 | 06:38 PM
  #3  
Calvin's Avatar
Overglorified Altima
iTrader: (65)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 53,506
Likes: 187
From: Chicago
man, it's tough just to get to 300+whp n/a. iuno how you're going to do 500+whp n/a unless you've got some DEEP pockets!
 
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2007 | 06:44 PM
  #4  
88G35's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
From: Berwyn, Pa
It was more just an idea. I mean I love the sound of a turbo spooling. so it was just a thought. I didn't really have a problem with the money I just wanted to do something different.
 
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2007 | 07:24 PM
  #6  
trey.hutcheson's Avatar
Staff Alumni
Staff Alumni
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,521
Likes: 2
From: Birmingham AL
^^^ He never got anywhere near 350rwhp.
 
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2007 | 10:29 PM
  #8  
88G35's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
From: Berwyn, Pa
He made 291hp w/ 15:1 Compression Ratio w/ a minor tune. In the end it looks like he gave up and went to FI.

One thing that he did not do is increase the stroke of his engine to make even more toqure, he just had the crankshaft lightened. I will be installing a stroker kit on my engine. And then yes I know I will need all new clearances and etc.. Maybe it would be better after it is all said and done to through TT's on it but I am not sure.
 
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2007 | 10:47 PM
  #9  
THX723's Avatar
G Kreuzer
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,812
Likes: 0
From: Southern California
With such a lofty goal you're definitely better off and cheaper going the FI route, which has matured quite nicely over the past years.

Having said that, assuming you could even manage 100hp/liter NA (another lofty goal for a non-works development), you're new project engine would need to displace no less than 5.0 liter, a size that is most non-ideal for a 6 cylinder layout and probably impossible as a rework from the existing 3.5 block.
 
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2007 | 11:09 PM
  #10  
88G35's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
From: Berwyn, Pa
Actually I would be aiming for about 4.3 liters. With a compression ratio of 11:1. If you look at AEBS stroker kit they have claimed to make some pretty impressive number from NA setup. Yes claimed is not full proof but I would be willing to give it a shot.

Check out this thread:
https://g35driver.com/forums/showthr...hlight=stroker

And why spend so much money on something that is gonna give me minimal power gains compared to FI. Its because I want to do something different. I want to give something else a try instead of following in everyones foot steps. I have had it extremely rough over the past 6 years and I found that taking your own path is much more exciting and fun IMPO. Not to say there is nothing wrong with going FI (which I might eventually do) but for right now I just wanna try something different and experiment.
 
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2007 | 11:35 PM
  #11  
THX723's Avatar
G Kreuzer
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,812
Likes: 0
From: Southern California
Yes, FI is very played out these days, therefore I understand and commend you should you choose to persuit the unorthodox NA route. Although I question your sanity with the 500hp goal.

I'm well aware of the existing 4.3L and 3.6L stroker kits out there. At 4.3L you'll need to generate in excess of 116hp/L to achieve 500hp, a feat you'll find virtually impossible even by oem standard for that given setup. 11:1 CR won't help you much, you're going to need a whole lot more than that. Throw a little laughing gas in the mix, then perhaps it might be possible.
 

Last edited by THX723; Jun 17, 2007 at 11:37 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2007 | 11:56 PM
  #12  
trey.hutcheson's Avatar
Staff Alumni
Staff Alumni
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,521
Likes: 2
From: Birmingham AL
Originally Posted by THX723
Yes, FI is very played out these days, therefore I understand and commend you should you choose to persuit the unorthodox NA route. Although I question your sanity with the 500hp goal.

I'm well aware of the existing 4.3L and 3.6L stroker kits out there. At 4.3L you'll need to generate in excess of 116hp/L to achieve 500hp, a feat you'll find virtually impossible even by oem standard for that given setup. 11:1 CR won't help you much, you're going to need a whole lot more than that. Throw a little laughing gas in the mix, then perhaps it might be possible.
116hp/L is possible, if he spins it at something like 15k rpms .

But that's in a world with FTL travel as well.
 
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2007 | 12:26 AM
  #13  
88G35's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
From: Berwyn, Pa
Originally Posted by THX723
Yes, FI is very played out these days, therefore I understand and commend you should you choose to persuit the unorthodox NA route. Although I question your sanity with the 500hp goal.

I'm well aware of the existing 4.3L and 3.6L stroker kits out there. At 4.3L you'll need to generate in excess of 116hp/L to achieve 500hp, a feat you'll find virtually impossible even by oem standard for that given setup. 11:1 CR won't help you much, you're going to need a whole lot more than that. Throw a little laughing gas in the mix, then perhaps it might be possible.
OK maybe 500hp is a little much. But I still wanna go the NA route.
 
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2007 | 12:29 AM
  #14  
THX723's Avatar
G Kreuzer
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,812
Likes: 0
From: Southern California
Originally Posted by 88G35
OK maybe 500hp is a little much. But I still wanna go the NA route.
Kudos to you then. I have the utmost respect for the NA route. Not to take anything away from the FI folks of course.
 
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2007 | 12:30 AM
  #15  
THX723's Avatar
G Kreuzer
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,812
Likes: 0
From: Southern California
Originally Posted by trey.hutcheson
116hp/L is possible, if he spins it at something like 15k rpms .

But that's in a world with FTL travel as well.
That would be a sight to see.
 
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:29 AM.