Project Help, All Motor 500+hp
#1
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Berwyn, Pa
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Project Help, All Motor 500+hp
I am starting to work on my new engine project. I noticed most of the people on this board making big power all have FI setups. I was thinking about doing a big power engine but having it all motor. What do you guys think?? I was looking for atleast 500+hp. Or would it just be better to go FI? Any suggestions/input at all are appreciated!
For those of you who have had or currently have a high hp all motor engine how do you like it?
BTW: Anybody that has a short block they don't need let me know!!
Thanks,
Chris
For those of you who have had or currently have a high hp all motor engine how do you like it?
BTW: Anybody that has a short block they don't need let me know!!
Thanks,
Chris
#4
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Berwyn, Pa
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#5
Guest
Posts: n/a
15.0:1 compression and 8500 RPM will get you around 350whp.
http://www.my350z.com/forum/showthre...ally+aspirated
http://www.my350z.com/forum/showthre...ally+aspirated
#7
Guest
Posts: n/a
Trending Topics
#8
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Berwyn, Pa
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
He made 291hp w/ 15:1 Compression Ratio w/ a minor tune. In the end it looks like he gave up and went to FI.
One thing that he did not do is increase the stroke of his engine to make even more toqure, he just had the crankshaft lightened. I will be installing a stroker kit on my engine. And then yes I know I will need all new clearances and etc.. Maybe it would be better after it is all said and done to through TT's on it but I am not sure.
One thing that he did not do is increase the stroke of his engine to make even more toqure, he just had the crankshaft lightened. I will be installing a stroker kit on my engine. And then yes I know I will need all new clearances and etc.. Maybe it would be better after it is all said and done to through TT's on it but I am not sure.
#9
G Kreuzer
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,812
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
With such a lofty goal you're definitely better off and cheaper going the FI route, which has matured quite nicely over the past years.
Having said that, assuming you could even manage 100hp/liter NA (another lofty goal for a non-works development), you're new project engine would need to displace no less than 5.0 liter, a size that is most non-ideal for a 6 cylinder layout and probably impossible as a rework from the existing 3.5 block.
Having said that, assuming you could even manage 100hp/liter NA (another lofty goal for a non-works development), you're new project engine would need to displace no less than 5.0 liter, a size that is most non-ideal for a 6 cylinder layout and probably impossible as a rework from the existing 3.5 block.
#10
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Berwyn, Pa
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Actually I would be aiming for about 4.3 liters. With a compression ratio of 11:1. If you look at AEBS stroker kit they have claimed to make some pretty impressive number from NA setup. Yes claimed is not full proof but I would be willing to give it a shot.
Check out this thread:
https://g35driver.com/forums/showthr...hlight=stroker
And why spend so much money on something that is gonna give me minimal power gains compared to FI. Its because I want to do something different. I want to give something else a try instead of following in everyones foot steps. I have had it extremely rough over the past 6 years and I found that taking your own path is much more exciting and fun IMPO. Not to say there is nothing wrong with going FI (which I might eventually do) but for right now I just wanna try something different and experiment.
Check out this thread:
https://g35driver.com/forums/showthr...hlight=stroker
And why spend so much money on something that is gonna give me minimal power gains compared to FI. Its because I want to do something different. I want to give something else a try instead of following in everyones foot steps. I have had it extremely rough over the past 6 years and I found that taking your own path is much more exciting and fun IMPO. Not to say there is nothing wrong with going FI (which I might eventually do) but for right now I just wanna try something different and experiment.
#11
G Kreuzer
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,812
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes, FI is very played out these days, therefore I understand and commend you should you choose to persuit the unorthodox NA route. Although I question your sanity with the 500hp goal.
I'm well aware of the existing 4.3L and 3.6L stroker kits out there. At 4.3L you'll need to generate in excess of 116hp/L to achieve 500hp, a feat you'll find virtually impossible even by oem standard for that given setup. 11:1 CR won't help you much, you're going to need a whole lot more than that. Throw a little laughing gas in the mix, then perhaps it might be possible.
I'm well aware of the existing 4.3L and 3.6L stroker kits out there. At 4.3L you'll need to generate in excess of 116hp/L to achieve 500hp, a feat you'll find virtually impossible even by oem standard for that given setup. 11:1 CR won't help you much, you're going to need a whole lot more than that. Throw a little laughing gas in the mix, then perhaps it might be possible.
Last edited by THX723; 06-17-2007 at 11:37 PM.
#12
Originally Posted by THX723
Yes, FI is very played out these days, therefore I understand and commend you should you choose to persuit the unorthodox NA route. Although I question your sanity with the 500hp goal.
I'm well aware of the existing 4.3L and 3.6L stroker kits out there. At 4.3L you'll need to generate in excess of 116hp/L to achieve 500hp, a feat you'll find virtually impossible even by oem standard for that given setup. 11:1 CR won't help you much, you're going to need a whole lot more than that. Throw a little laughing gas in the mix, then perhaps it might be possible.
I'm well aware of the existing 4.3L and 3.6L stroker kits out there. At 4.3L you'll need to generate in excess of 116hp/L to achieve 500hp, a feat you'll find virtually impossible even by oem standard for that given setup. 11:1 CR won't help you much, you're going to need a whole lot more than that. Throw a little laughing gas in the mix, then perhaps it might be possible.
But that's in a world with FTL travel as well.
#13
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Berwyn, Pa
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by THX723
Yes, FI is very played out these days, therefore I understand and commend you should you choose to persuit the unorthodox NA route. Although I question your sanity with the 500hp goal.
I'm well aware of the existing 4.3L and 3.6L stroker kits out there. At 4.3L you'll need to generate in excess of 116hp/L to achieve 500hp, a feat you'll find virtually impossible even by oem standard for that given setup. 11:1 CR won't help you much, you're going to need a whole lot more than that. Throw a little laughing gas in the mix, then perhaps it might be possible.
I'm well aware of the existing 4.3L and 3.6L stroker kits out there. At 4.3L you'll need to generate in excess of 116hp/L to achieve 500hp, a feat you'll find virtually impossible even by oem standard for that given setup. 11:1 CR won't help you much, you're going to need a whole lot more than that. Throw a little laughing gas in the mix, then perhaps it might be possible.