Engine, Drivetrain & Forced-Induction Have Technical Questions or Done Modifications to the G35? Find out the answer in here! (View All Posts)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Which Stroker?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Apr 11, 2008 | 04:22 PM
  #46  
nevdull's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
just wanted to jump in and say good luck, keep us posted with your decision.

i too, am very interested in going the higher compression stroker route.

i personally wouldn't go tt, and certainly not without an engine build.

if the engine build just wasn't satisfying enough on its own, i'd bolt on a supercharger. a pretty good article "Effect of compression ratio-supercharged 5.4L 4V." talks about the advantage of superchargers and high compression motors. yummy!
 
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2008 | 12:40 AM
  #47  
Gee3point5Mhmm's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 795
Likes: 6
From: St. Louis
Originally Posted by IvoryGT
yeah Im aiming at 11.5:1 I think 12:1 is pushing it with 93 octane.
why will a 12:1 be pushing it with pump gas? (this is a question to expand my knowledge of NA motors, if you read it the wrong way.)
 
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2008 | 10:25 AM
  #48  
nevdull's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Gee3point5Mhmm
why will a 12:1 be pushing it with pump gas? (this is a question to expand my knowledge of NA motors, if you read it the wrong way.)
what the OP is likely alluding to is that higher compression engines are generally more susceptible to engine knock (additional fuel/air explosions to the "normal" ignition).

the octane rating is a measurement of fuel's autoignition resistance and autoignition is the lowest temperature of spontaneous ignition.

it follows then to resist knock (due to increased compression ratio) increase the fuel's autoignition point by using higher octane rated fuel.

obviously thats oversimplified, and many things can lead to knock and its reduction: reduce pressure/decrease compression ratio, reduce spark timing, increase engine cooling, remove carbon deposits, richen the fuel mixture, and many other things...
 
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2008 | 01:45 PM
  #49  
mIKE's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,408
Likes: 7
From: Orange County, CA
Originally Posted by IvoryGT
whatever...I enjoy high reving engines without worrying about where my boost is at...or if my vacuum line is screwed up...or if my fuel map is right..or..some other million gadget is going wrong. Plus im probably the only one that thinks 350 at the wheels is more than plenty for anyone on the road. looks like it'll be hard to get 300 at the wheels with just na.
I remember reading a thread on my350z where someone had posted a 300whp NA 4 cylinder... and half the people were bashing it for being 'only' 300whp, and the other half were praising it because the VQ is pretty difficult to get too 300whp NA....

That being said, I have seen some stroker VQs, and the potential is definately there, especially if the same amount of work goes into the VQ as was put in the 4 cylinder...

Also, the 4 cylinder was running on race gas, not pump.

I'll post up the link when I find it.

*edit*

http://my350z.com/forum/showthread.p...ighlight=s2000
 

Last edited by mIKE; Apr 13, 2008 at 01:48 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2008 | 03:32 PM
  #50  
IvoryGT's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (13)
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,212
Likes: 12
^i would have to say that the comments are always quite critical on that forum, as to why, I am not sure.

Thanks Nevdull for clearing up the compression and pump gas. I don't know extensively the mechanics and chemistry behind gas rating and knock, but I know when you are into the 12:1 compression and up, most are running race gas for added hp and safety for the motor.

In whatever case the budget for this project is probably somewhere around 15K at least. I will look more into it, I wonder why there aren't any shops just doing this to show case?
 
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2008 | 04:54 PM
  #51  
mIKE's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,408
Likes: 7
From: Orange County, CA
Originally Posted by Gee3point5Mhmm
why will a 12:1 be pushing it with pump gas? (this is a question to expand my knowledge of NA motors, if you read it the wrong way.)

Ideal Gas Laws.

Higher pressure = higher temperature.

more compression = higher pressure = higher temperature = more likely to detonate/knock/ping.

Higher octane is more resistant to detonation/knocking/pinging.
 
Reply
Old May 4, 2008 | 07:10 PM
  #52  
exagorazo's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
From: Eau Claire, Wisconsin
After tripping over engine parts and getting myself full of oil while exploring the FI forum, I have been thinking the same thing. Perhaps the reliability of N/A trumps the overall of FI.

But a few questions come up. First, what power level can realistically be achieved? If the power vs. displacement curve is anywhere near linear, it looks like the strokers may top out below 300 WHP. Is 350 WHP a realistic hope?

Second, how will engine management work? Will the ECU from the 3.5 run the stroker? How would the engine be controlled and tuned?
 
Reply
Old May 4, 2008 | 08:13 PM
  #53  
hipi2002's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 265
Likes: 1
From: South Florida
Originally Posted by IvoryGT
whatever...I enjoy high reving engines without worrying about where my boost is at...or if my vacuum line is screwed up...or if my fuel map is right..or..some other million gadget is going wrong. Plus im probably the only one that thinks 350 at the wheels is more than plenty for anyone on the road. looks like it'll be hard to get 300 at the wheels with just na.
I feel the same way you feel about being satified w/350hp from a NA. I'm getting a Sedan within a month and though boost is great, I figured I have a strong NA Sedan it would somewhat give me a chance to redirect monies to the style and exterior showmanship. Like I said I would love boost but when it comes down to the new Challenger coming out next year, what's Boost, lol?
 
Reply
Old May 4, 2008 | 09:27 PM
  #54  
High Octane's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 993
Likes: 11
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by IvoryGT
Plus im probably the only one that thinks 350 at the wheels is more than plenty for anyone on the road. .
agree 100%
350whp is faster then 90% of cars on the road.
 
Reply
Old May 5, 2008 | 11:35 AM
  #55  
IvoryGT's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (13)
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,212
Likes: 12
Realistic figures are some where between 300 to 350. however 350 is not impossible just difficult and with the lack of examples out there of a stroked VQ on high compression, it's hard to say how attainable it is, it doesn't stop me from trying though.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hal@IP
Intake & Exhaust
97
Sep 29, 2011 05:14 PM
XKR
Forced Induction
203
Jun 5, 2011 11:59 PM
ynhrgt
Engine, Drivetrain & Forced-Induction
26
Nov 22, 2005 03:17 PM
gumpdriver
Engine, Drivetrain & Forced-Induction
1
Oct 30, 2004 01:30 AM
exagorazo
Forced Induction
27
Sep 12, 2004 11:14 AM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:20 AM.