Engine, Drivetrain & Forced-Induction Have Technical Questions or Done Modifications to the G35? Find out the answer in here! (View All Posts)

UR Crank Pulley: The Final Word

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #61  
Old 12-26-2004 | 09:10 PM
jcv's Avatar
jcv
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 120
Likes: 1
From: Houston
JKDman, thanx for the great pictures. Point of interest - looking at them, especially the first one, it looks like this is a two piece hub or is it just the shadows? It just looks like the outer inertia ring in the front part of the hub is separate from the inner hub? By the way, you keeping the hub in your desk or just a very nice garage?
 

Last edited by jcv; 12-26-2004 at 09:16 PM.
  #62  
Old 12-26-2004 | 10:03 PM
al503's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,477
Likes: 0
From: Beaverton Oregon
Originally Posted by jcv
JKDman, thanx for the great pictures. Point of interest - looking at them, especially the first one, it looks like this is a two piece hub or is it just the shadows? It just looks like the outer inertia ring in the front part of the hub is separate from the inner hub? By the way, you keeping the hub in your desk or just a very nice garage?
yup. Thanks for posting the pics JKD. JCV, it looks like it's all 1 piece to me. The rubber looks like it's in a little slot. I just stuck a little knife point in there and it went in about 1/8" before it stopped on something solid.
 
  #63  
Old 12-26-2004 | 10:06 PM
JKDman's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
From: Streets of LA
The first pic is a short of the rear
The second pic is pretty self explanatory
The third pic is of the front. (What you'd see from the front of the engine)

It shows a piece of hard rubber in between the inner and outer but the thrd pic shows that the rubber doesn't go all the way through.

I keep the hub in my room. Wish my garage was that nice.
 
  #64  
Old 12-26-2004 | 10:22 PM
Aznteazer's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,295
Likes: 1
From: So.Cal. - Hacienda Hts. 626
i'm gonna say whatever jkdman said cuz i'm so damn lazy to type this out.
 
  #65  
Old 12-26-2004 | 10:43 PM
WRAH's Avatar
WRAH
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,708
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, OH (Area)
As an outsider to this thread......

I'm LOST!
 
  #66  
Old 12-26-2004 | 10:58 PM
Hydrazine's Avatar
Former G35driver Vendor
iTrader: (23)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,054
Likes: 85
From: Los Angeles California
Originally Posted by WRAH
As an outsider to this thread......

I'm LOST!
You don't want to know. If you participate, tread litely... Like every other pully thread it ends up in a war between the reds and the blues.
 
  #67  
Old 12-26-2004 | 11:01 PM
WRAH's Avatar
WRAH
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,708
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, OH (Area)
Originally Posted by Hydrazine
You don't want to know. If you participate, tread litely... Like every other pully thread it ends up in a war between the reds and the blues.
I came for the "final word" as this was on my wish list, not since reading this thread, I crossed it off 5 times and writan in down 4!
 
  #68  
Old 12-26-2004 | 11:21 PM
jcv's Avatar
jcv
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 120
Likes: 1
From: Houston
WRAH, with all the snow in Columbus you won't need any performance parts for a long time. Since you haven't followed this endless thread, the pulley test is still to come!

Hydrazine, UDR makes pulleys in red and blue- kinda non denominational.
 

Last edited by jcv; 12-26-2004 at 11:24 PM.
  #69  
Old 12-26-2004 | 11:27 PM
DaveB's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,573
Likes: 72
From: Kansas City
Originally Posted by al503
Think about it this way: did your lighter weight wheels increase engine output? No. Does the UR crank increase your engine output? No. Will reductions in rotational mass increase performance? Yes. There are slight gains shown on the dyno most likely from the reduction in weight but there is a noticeable increase in what some call 'acceleration hp.'
Regardless, the pulley adds HP to the wheels. Freeing it up is adding it. If the car is faster, then more power is going to the ground. If the car accelerates faster thru any rpm then it's making more power.

Performance Nissan has a couple dedicated track 350z's. The drivers mention that the single most effective power mod they made was a lighter weight flywheel, which reduces rotational mass. The difference in weight is much greater than changing the pulley but the principle is the same.
A lightened flywheel causes no crankshaft problems and is not a damper therefore I believe what they say when it comes to road course racing with a lightened flywheel. Lightened flywheels are far lighter than UDPs and since more of the weight is further from the crank axis, the rotational inertia is much more severe. A lightened flywheel is great for a car that spends a lot of time racing in the upper rpm range and also offers better rev matching. In a drag race, the lightened flywheel offers no benefit. If anything, it hampers 1/4 mile performance because the motor is far more prone to bogging on launch because of the lack of inertia. Lots of Maxima owners run Fidanza flywheels that are about 10lbs less than stock. These guys are no quicker or faster with the lightened flywheel many guys actually went slower because when they launched the car bogged down.
 
  #70  
Old 12-26-2004 | 11:45 PM
GeeMan's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,035
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR USA
I just did the crank pulley mod and I'm loving it. Acceleration is improved and low end responsiveness is noticeably better. Most impressed with it so far.
 
  #71  
Old 12-27-2004 | 12:00 AM
DaveB's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,573
Likes: 72
From: Kansas City
Originally Posted by JKDman
So basically it now comes to this. The rubber ring that you once thought went through the entire pulley was a harmonic balancer. The maxima's 4.2lb pulley, yes. The rubber ring goes through the entire pulley (in the MAXIMA). And without it, you said it would cause problems since no harmonic damper is present.

The G's does not go all the way through the pulley and you'll see it in the pics below that i have conveniently attached for you. I thought it might help becuase it seemed like you've never seen on in real life, or even a picture of one.
1. You can't balance harmonics. There's no such thing

2. In picture #1 of the backside of the pulley, you see the rubber ring. The central part of the pulley south of the ring is it's own pulley (call it pulley #1). This pulley is heavy cast iron and has slides over the crank. The upper part of the pulley north of the ring is it's own pulley. Mounted to this pulley (call it pulley #2) is the ribbed surfaces that drive the belts. Pulley #1 fits inside pulley #2 and the rubber ring is what joins them together.

The issue at hand is: WILL THE UR CRANK PULLEY SINGLEHANDEDLY CAUSE CRANKSHAFT FAILURE AND/OR PREMATURE BEARING WEAR.
Probably not.

Don't worry about the lack of added performance from the UR pulley. I don't care about DYNO numbers you found at i-hate-UR-pulleys.com or whatnot. Here's what you do. After you get your G drive it around, get used to it. Then drive someone's G that HAS a UR pulley. The difference IS THERE. But then again, you seem to live life by reading about it. As for me, I like to live life and feel it.
Haha. You don't care that you UDP probably didn't make you any quicker? Why did you get it then? Have you ever been to the track to test before and after?

It's pretty damn funny how we're talking about engine problems may arise from the use of the UR pulley. Yet you choose to counter those that are pro-UR pulley by linking us to a thread where the stock crank pulley plain gave up.
You guys asked me to provide pics of a failed pulley and now you're gonna bust my chops about a failure of something I can't control? Are you serious, Fruitcake The failures of these pulleys are completely rare and isolated and typically seem to happen to older cars with high mileage in salty climates. Look at the pics again and take note at how rusted that thing is. My 96 Maxima's 112K pulley looks brandnew compared to that one.

Don't sidetrack with smaller tires and smaller rims for better performance.
That wasn't a sidetrack. I was simply agreeing with JCV and it seems to be something most G35 owners don't understand. The reduced rotational weight of my tire combo will result in a quicker car, much like what you believe the UDP is doing. However the lighter rim/tire combo is far more effiective than an UDP because:

1) More rotational weight is removed (10lbs vs 2.2lbs)
2) The tire/rim combo requires a lot more energy to move because it isn't mounted directly to the engine therefore reducing rotational weight is more benefical to the overall performance.
3) The tire/rim combo keeps more of the weight closer to hub compared to the stock 17s therefore less energy is wasted accelerating the rims.

Side benefits:

1) Grip
2) 10% improvement in gearing


I guess I'll just have to agree to disagree on the UDP issue. Years ago when the UDP was introduced to the Maxima community it was the mod to get, just as what we're seeing with the G35 community. Everyone that got the pulley swore it made a difference, the engine revved faster, and the car was a lot faster. Then us track racers started putting these things to the test under the timing lights and under the rollers of Dynojet 248s. The truth became known and now no one on Maxima.org buys these anymore except for the newbies that don't know any better.
 

Last edited by DaveB; 12-27-2004 at 12:13 AM.
  #72  
Old 12-27-2004 | 12:55 AM
al503's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,477
Likes: 0
From: Beaverton Oregon
Originally Posted by DaveB
2. In picture #1 of the backside of the pulley, you see the rubber ring. The central part of the pulley south of the ring is it's own pulley (call it pulley #1). This pulley is heavy cast iron and has slides over the crank. The upper part of the pulley north of the ring is it's own pulley. Mounted to this pulley (call it pulley #2) is the ribbed surfaces that drive the belts. Pulley #1 fits inside pulley #2 and the rubber ring is what joins them together.
Actually and for the final time, the rubber ring does not go through the pulley. If you look at pic 3, there is no gap of rubber. It is nothing but solid metal connecting pulley 1 to pulley 2 as you state it. Why you still claim that it goes all the way through baffles me.

1) More rotational weight is removed (10lbs vs 2.2lbs)
Again, I ask you to put your $ where you mouth is. Your information is incorrect. The stock pulley is not ~4 lbs. It is closer to 7. Please don't make this assertion again without some back-up or, again, put your $ where your mouth is. You're spreading incorrect information by either ignorance or on purpose. Either way, it's wrong.
 
  #73  
Old 12-27-2004 | 01:31 AM
DaveB's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,573
Likes: 72
From: Kansas City
Originally Posted by al503
Actually and for the final time, the rubber ring does not go through the pulley. If you look at pic 3, there is no gap of rubber. It is nothing but solid metal connecting pulley 1 to pulley 2 as you state it. Why you still claim that it goes all the way through baffles me.
You're failing to grasp what I'm saying here. Pulley #1 fit inside of the Pulley #2. Portions of the Pulley #2 cover the ring so that you can't see it from outside. A lip of metal is covering ring.

Since you think you're looking at one single pulley and you believe that UR UDP is flawless and that the stock pulley will fail, I dare you to cut out that rubber ring (torch it, cut it, etc) and see what happens. $100 says you'll have two pulleys.
 

Last edited by DaveB; 12-27-2004 at 12:38 PM.
  #74  
Old 12-27-2004 | 11:31 AM
Hydrazine's Avatar
Former G35driver Vendor
iTrader: (23)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,054
Likes: 85
From: Los Angeles California
Originally Posted by DaveB
I date you to cut out that rubber ring (torch it, cut it, etc) and see what happens. $100 says you'll have two pulleys.
DaveB throws down the gauntlet! $100

I have to agree with DaveB here. Its probably two pullies with one floating in a layer of captured rubber. I won't bet money on it but a two part pully would make sense simply because the damping effect would be much more efficient for a given size and mass.

I have a band saw for sectioning...

---------
You see what I mean WRAH? These pully threads get nasty.
 
  #75  
Old 12-27-2004 | 12:40 PM
DaveB's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,573
Likes: 72
From: Kansas City
Originally Posted by Hydrazine
IYou see what I mean WRAH? These pully threads get nasty.
Isn't that the truth.
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: UR Crank Pulley: The Final Word



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:50 PM.