UR Crank Pulley: The Final Word
#61
JKDman, thanx for the great pictures. Point of interest - looking at them, especially the first one, it looks like this is a two piece hub or is it just the shadows? It just looks like the outer inertia ring in the front part of the hub is separate from the inner hub? By the way, you keeping the hub in your desk or just a very nice garage?
Last edited by jcv; 12-26-2004 at 09:16 PM.
#62
Originally Posted by jcv
JKDman, thanx for the great pictures. Point of interest - looking at them, especially the first one, it looks like this is a two piece hub or is it just the shadows? It just looks like the outer inertia ring in the front part of the hub is separate from the inner hub? By the way, you keeping the hub in your desk or just a very nice garage?
#63
The first pic is a short of the rear
The second pic is pretty self explanatory
The third pic is of the front. (What you'd see from the front of the engine)
It shows a piece of hard rubber in between the inner and outer but the thrd pic shows that the rubber doesn't go all the way through.
I keep the hub in my room. Wish my garage was that nice.
The second pic is pretty self explanatory
The third pic is of the front. (What you'd see from the front of the engine)
It shows a piece of hard rubber in between the inner and outer but the thrd pic shows that the rubber doesn't go all the way through.
I keep the hub in my room. Wish my garage was that nice.
#67
Originally Posted by Hydrazine
You don't want to know. If you participate, tread litely... Like every other pully thread it ends up in a war between the reds and the blues.
#68
#69
Originally Posted by al503
Think about it this way: did your lighter weight wheels increase engine output? No. Does the UR crank increase your engine output? No. Will reductions in rotational mass increase performance? Yes. There are slight gains shown on the dyno most likely from the reduction in weight but there is a noticeable increase in what some call 'acceleration hp.'
Performance Nissan has a couple dedicated track 350z's. The drivers mention that the single most effective power mod they made was a lighter weight flywheel, which reduces rotational mass. The difference in weight is much greater than changing the pulley but the principle is the same.
#71
Originally Posted by JKDman
So basically it now comes to this. The rubber ring that you once thought went through the entire pulley was a harmonic balancer. The maxima's 4.2lb pulley, yes. The rubber ring goes through the entire pulley (in the MAXIMA). And without it, you said it would cause problems since no harmonic damper is present.
The G's does not go all the way through the pulley and you'll see it in the pics below that i have conveniently attached for you. I thought it might help becuase it seemed like you've never seen on in real life, or even a picture of one.
The G's does not go all the way through the pulley and you'll see it in the pics below that i have conveniently attached for you. I thought it might help becuase it seemed like you've never seen on in real life, or even a picture of one.
2. In picture #1 of the backside of the pulley, you see the rubber ring. The central part of the pulley south of the ring is it's own pulley (call it pulley #1). This pulley is heavy cast iron and has slides over the crank. The upper part of the pulley north of the ring is it's own pulley. Mounted to this pulley (call it pulley #2) is the ribbed surfaces that drive the belts. Pulley #1 fits inside pulley #2 and the rubber ring is what joins them together.
The issue at hand is: WILL THE UR CRANK PULLEY SINGLEHANDEDLY CAUSE CRANKSHAFT FAILURE AND/OR PREMATURE BEARING WEAR.
Don't worry about the lack of added performance from the UR pulley. I don't care about DYNO numbers you found at i-hate-UR-pulleys.com or whatnot. Here's what you do. After you get your G drive it around, get used to it. Then drive someone's G that HAS a UR pulley. The difference IS THERE. But then again, you seem to live life by reading about it. As for me, I like to live life and feel it.
It's pretty damn funny how we're talking about engine problems may arise from the use of the UR pulley. Yet you choose to counter those that are pro-UR pulley by linking us to a thread where the stock crank pulley plain gave up.
Don't sidetrack with smaller tires and smaller rims for better performance.
1) More rotational weight is removed (10lbs vs 2.2lbs)
2) The tire/rim combo requires a lot more energy to move because it isn't mounted directly to the engine therefore reducing rotational weight is more benefical to the overall performance.
3) The tire/rim combo keeps more of the weight closer to hub compared to the stock 17s therefore less energy is wasted accelerating the rims.
Side benefits:
1) Grip
2) 10% improvement in gearing
I guess I'll just have to agree to disagree on the UDP issue. Years ago when the UDP was introduced to the Maxima community it was the mod to get, just as what we're seeing with the G35 community. Everyone that got the pulley swore it made a difference, the engine revved faster, and the car was a lot faster. Then us track racers started putting these things to the test under the timing lights and under the rollers of Dynojet 248s. The truth became known and now no one on Maxima.org buys these anymore except for the newbies that don't know any better.
Last edited by DaveB; 12-27-2004 at 12:13 AM.
#72
Originally Posted by DaveB
2. In picture #1 of the backside of the pulley, you see the rubber ring. The central part of the pulley south of the ring is it's own pulley (call it pulley #1). This pulley is heavy cast iron and has slides over the crank. The upper part of the pulley north of the ring is it's own pulley. Mounted to this pulley (call it pulley #2) is the ribbed surfaces that drive the belts. Pulley #1 fits inside pulley #2 and the rubber ring is what joins them together.
1) More rotational weight is removed (10lbs vs 2.2lbs)
#73
Originally Posted by al503
Actually and for the final time, the rubber ring does not go through the pulley. If you look at pic 3, there is no gap of rubber. It is nothing but solid metal connecting pulley 1 to pulley 2 as you state it. Why you still claim that it goes all the way through baffles me.
Since you think you're looking at one single pulley and you believe that UR UDP is flawless and that the stock pulley will fail, I dare you to cut out that rubber ring (torch it, cut it, etc) and see what happens. $100 says you'll have two pulleys.
Last edited by DaveB; 12-27-2004 at 12:38 PM.
#74
Former G35driver Vendor
iTrader: (23)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,054
Likes: 85
From: Los Angeles California
Originally Posted by DaveB
I date you to cut out that rubber ring (torch it, cut it, etc) and see what happens. $100 says you'll have two pulleys.
I have to agree with DaveB here. Its probably two pullies with one floating in a layer of captured rubber. I won't bet money on it but a two part pully would make sense simply because the damping effect would be much more efficient for a given size and mass.
I have a band saw for sectioning...
---------
You see what I mean WRAH? These pully threads get nasty.