Engine, Drivetrain & Forced-Induction Have Technical Questions or Done Modifications to the G35? Find out the answer in here! (View All Posts)

Popcharger or K&N drop-in?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #1  
Old 04-27-2005, 12:07 PM
dirrtybear's Avatar
raises all-in
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 2,783
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Popcharger or K&N drop-in?

Ok, I've decided on the OEM Z-tube. Now the only question is...JWT popcharger or K&N drop-in filter?

Searching and reading some previous threads, I gather that the differences are:

* popcharger sounds better
* popcharger is more sensitive to temperature differences (may even lose power vs stock in hot summer weather)
* K&N's performance is consistent, but not as good as popcharger in cold temperatures

I'd like to get some final thoughts from you guys before I make my decision. Thanks.
 
  #2  
Old 04-27-2005, 12:29 PM
orhanz33's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i like the popcharger. it even sounds almost like a turbo spooling under light acceleration you probably won't feel much of a gain from the tube+filter untill you swap out your oem plenum!
 
  #3  
Old 04-27-2005, 06:31 PM
ainsley's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Austin, TX USA
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Agree. Neither one will turn your car into a 600 HP monster, but the Pop gives more benefit than a K&N filter. I live where it's over 100º for four months out of the year, and I've never *noticed* a power loss in the heat.
 
  #4  
Old 04-27-2005, 10:42 PM
skeleton_cru's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: East Bay, Cali
Posts: 17,096
Received 11 Likes on 5 Posts
Sedan
Originally Posted by dirrtybear
Ok, I've decided on the OEM Z-tube. Now the only question is...JWT popcharger or K&N drop-in filter?

Searching and reading some previous threads, I gather that the differences are:

* popcharger sounds better
* popcharger is more sensitive to temperature differences (may even lose power vs stock in hot summer weather)
* K&N's performance is consistent, but not as good as popcharger in cold temperatures

I'd like to get some final thoughts from you guys before I make my decision. Thanks.
I opted for the K&N filter simply because I believe the stock air box is a good design that is difficult to improve on.
 
  #5  
Old 04-27-2005, 11:19 PM
BlackonBlackG35's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,513
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I've used the PopCharger and was very disappointed. It feels weaker in the lower rpm. Other people can confirm this also. I could really feel it accelerating from a dead stop.

Next I switched to the Stillen Hi Flo Box. With the Stillen, torque loss in the lower RPM is less noticeable. Also contrary to popular belief, The Stillen is a little louder than the PopCharger.

I believe the Z-tube+K&N is the best option but if really want to make your car louder, go with the Stillen.
 
  #6  
Old 04-27-2005, 11:28 PM
aszatk01's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Manayunk (Philly)
Posts: 1,622
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i'm deciding between the two as well, and the Stillen i guess now according to BlackonBlackG35. the sound is actually what i'm most interested in. to some extent, i feel that the stock G35c sounds a bit too much like a riced out civic. i'm looking more for a 911 sound--not gonna happen, but you get what i mean. what kind of sound do the K&N, popcharger and stillen produce? again, not as concerned with performance or even volume, but the quality to the sound.
thx in advance.
 
  #7  
Old 04-27-2005, 11:49 PM
kenempireex's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Oakland
Posts: 2,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
is Stillen suppose to be better than popcharger?
 
  #8  
Old 04-27-2005, 11:53 PM
Kyosho's Avatar
Former G35driver Vendor
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Berkeley CA, Diamond Bar CA
Posts: 2,296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
it costs twice as much, and the difference couldnt possibly be that major. its all personal preference.
 
  #9  
Old 04-28-2005, 12:02 AM
Ivory05G's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A K&N filter will not make any appreciable performance gain.
 
  #10  
Old 04-28-2005, 12:07 AM
skeleton_cru's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: East Bay, Cali
Posts: 17,096
Received 11 Likes on 5 Posts
Sedan
Originally Posted by BlackonBlackG35
I've used the PopCharger and was very disappointed. It feels weaker in the lower rpm. Other people can confirm this also. I could really feel it accelerating from a dead stop.

Next I switched to the Stillen Hi Flo Box. With the Stillen, torque loss in the lower RPM is less noticeable. Also contrary to popular belief, The Stillen is a little louder than the PopCharger.

I believe the Z-tube+K&N is the best option but if really want to make your car louder, go with the Stillen.
Does this make two things I've said that you agree with?
 
  #11  
Old 04-28-2005, 12:40 AM
BlackonBlackG35's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,513
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by skeleton_cru
Does this make two things I've said that you agree with?
Haha...yeah, its a start....


Originally Posted by Ivory05G
A K&N filter will not make any appreciable performance gain.
Your right, but either the popcharger filter suck's or the stillen shroud really makes a difference.

I do a lot stop and go city driving and the popcharger just annoyed me. So I sold it on ebay and bought the stillen. Although its not as good as the Z-Tube+K&N, its not as bad as the popcharger.

Also some said sound is important, the popcharger and stillen sound similar but the stillen is a little bit louder.
 
  #12  
Old 04-28-2005, 10:18 PM
Gumba35's Avatar
Charter Member Florida G35 Club
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I went with the K&N after hearing from several friends that the popcharger makes the G bog down when its hot out until you get the rpm's up. I wasn't crazy about the sound of the popcharger either.
 
  #13  
Old 04-29-2005, 12:16 PM
S-Tuned's Avatar
gtr proto test driver
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dirty Jersey
Posts: 1,408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
when you install the Z-tube and keep the stock box do you hear a sound differance or is it the JWT that gives you that cool sound
 
  #14  
Old 04-29-2005, 12:30 PM
Gumba35's Avatar
Charter Member Florida G35 Club
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Popcharger is louder but the Z-tube/stock airbox provides a nice sound at WOT.
 
  #15  
Old 04-29-2005, 05:22 PM
dirrtybear's Avatar
raises all-in
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 2,783
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks all for the replies.

I think I'm going with the K&N. I'm not concerned about sound, I prefer the stealthy look, and I DEFINITELY don't want even the slightest chance of losing low-end torque. Plus, it's cheaper.
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Popcharger or K&N drop-in?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:31 AM.