2005 G35 6mt with 7351 miles Dynoed today
#1
2005 G35 6mt with 7351 miles Dynoed today
Had my 05 Dynoed today for other reasons I can not say at this moment. I needed a baseline. The car is stock except for a ztube. The car is exceptionally powerful. Even more powerful than my 04 G35 6mt.
Basically the dyno speaks for itself. Take a look.
FYI:
Stock DYNO for 2005 G35 Sedan 6mt with 7351 Miles, outside temp 60 degrees, shop temp 75~ degrees. Car could not go above 6800 rpms due to speed limiter at 145 mph kicking in.
Car was dynoed in 5th gear for 1:1 ratio.
One above shows rpms, one below shows speed.
Basically the dyno speaks for itself. Take a look.
FYI:
Stock DYNO for 2005 G35 Sedan 6mt with 7351 Miles, outside temp 60 degrees, shop temp 75~ degrees. Car could not go above 6800 rpms due to speed limiter at 145 mph kicking in.
Car was dynoed in 5th gear for 1:1 ratio.
One above shows rpms, one below shows speed.
#5
This is from a magazine article on "dynojet" dynos.
SAE j1349 correction:
29.23 in/hg.
77 degree temp
0 percent humidity
Standard correction:
29.92 in/hg.
68 degree temp
0 percent humidity
What this all means is that "Standard" will give you 2.6 percent better numbers (very popular for the import crowd). The example the magazine gave was a Vette making 412 (SAE corrected hp). With the Standard correction it made 423. All that you will have to do is multiply your "Standard rwhp" by .974 This should equal SAE (the one everyone uses). Up here in the great white North (Washington) the temps are in the 40-50 degree area, along with 29.9-30 in/hg. So, our numbers are actually corrected down from what it made at the rear. Usually, 96-97 percent of actual posted numbers. If you dyno when it's a hotter temp or higher altitudes the numbers will usually correct up to equal the desired temp, humidity and pressure of the correction factor.
SAE j1349 correction:
29.23 in/hg.
77 degree temp
0 percent humidity
Standard correction:
29.92 in/hg.
68 degree temp
0 percent humidity
What this all means is that "Standard" will give you 2.6 percent better numbers (very popular for the import crowd). The example the magazine gave was a Vette making 412 (SAE corrected hp). With the Standard correction it made 423. All that you will have to do is multiply your "Standard rwhp" by .974 This should equal SAE (the one everyone uses). Up here in the great white North (Washington) the temps are in the 40-50 degree area, along with 29.9-30 in/hg. So, our numbers are actually corrected down from what it made at the rear. Usually, 96-97 percent of actual posted numbers. If you dyno when it's a hotter temp or higher altitudes the numbers will usually correct up to equal the desired temp, humidity and pressure of the correction factor.
#7
So, how much it change from the 04 to the 05? Is the claim of 19 extra ponies true? Also, did you lose torque as also claims from the 04 to the 05? Just curious. I'm actually thinking nothing really change unless you reach redline. Finally, do you have your 04 dyno sheet? Thanks for the info.
Trending Topics
#8
Why is the STD correction factor 1.02 and the SAE correction factor 1.00? It should be 1.02 for either. Using a 1.02 should push the numbers even lower.
Regardless, the numbers are still pretty strong, but not out of the ordinary. I've seen dynos for the Rev-up 350Zs and G35s in the 245-255whp range.
Either way, it doesn't means much because every dyno reads differently. Time to go to the track.
Regardless, the numbers are still pretty strong, but not out of the ordinary. I've seen dynos for the Rev-up 350Zs and G35s in the 245-255whp range.
Either way, it doesn't means much because every dyno reads differently. Time to go to the track.
#9
Originally Posted by DaveB
Why is the STD correction factor 1.02 and the SAE correction factor 1.00? It should be 1.02 for either. Using a 1.02 should push the numbers even lower.
Regardless, the numbers are still pretty strong, but not out of the ordinary. I've seen dynos for the Rev-up 350Zs and G35s in the 245-255whp range.
Either way, it doesn't means much because every dyno reads differently. Time to go to the track.
Regardless, the numbers are still pretty strong, but not out of the ordinary. I've seen dynos for the Rev-up 350Zs and G35s in the 245-255whp range.
Either way, it doesn't means much because every dyno reads differently. Time to go to the track.
All I can say is 20hp and 20 tq~ ithrough the midrange depending on the car and conditions. That's the only hint you guys get!
Edit: I misspoke and didn't mean to say 20 and 20 through the whole rpm range. I apologize as I was in a hurry when I posted that. Thanks.
Last edited by G35_TX; 10-09-2005 at 12:45 PM.
#10
Originally Posted by G35_TX
True every dyno is slightly different. But I needed a baseline before some mods get put on tomorrow . I am a beta tester for a new product. We will see what happens
All I can say is 20hp and 20 tq~ is almost guranteed throughout the rpm range with this mod. That's the only hint you guys get!
All I can say is 20hp and 20 tq~ is almost guranteed throughout the rpm range with this mod. That's the only hint you guys get!
I guess the only way we'll know is in time.
Subscribing to thread.
Interested in seeing what this mod is.
Good Luck. Have fun.
DRU
Last edited by MEECHIN; 10-09-2005 at 11:31 AM.
#11
It has already been tested on around six 05 G35 Rev engines and has produced around 20 hp and 20 tq through the mid range. You just wait and see.
There will be some Dynos posted today by Rev up engines that were dynoed in Calif yesterday. They will post the results but no details of the mod yet until its fully released.
There will be some Dynos posted today by Rev up engines that were dynoed in Calif yesterday. They will post the results but no details of the mod yet until its fully released.
Last edited by G35_TX; 10-09-2005 at 12:44 PM.
#13
Originally Posted by G35_TX
As for the gain of 20hp/tq, keep in mind that's on Church's overly optimistic dyno which for whatever reason converts to "flywheel HP and TQ". On a Dynojet expect ~10-12whp/wtq. Still not bad.
I'd love to see what a stock LS1 would do on Church's dyno. 370whp? 380whp?
#14
Originally Posted by DaveB
03/04 lower intake manifold with a spacer?
As for the gain of 20hp/tq, keep in mind that's on Church's overly optimistic dyno which for whatever reason converts to "flywheel HP and TQ". On a Dynojet expect ~10-12whp/wtq. Still not bad.
I'd love to see what a stock LS1 would do on Church's dyno. 370whp? 380whp?
As for the gain of 20hp/tq, keep in mind that's on Church's overly optimistic dyno which for whatever reason converts to "flywheel HP and TQ". On a Dynojet expect ~10-12whp/wtq. Still not bad.
I'd love to see what a stock LS1 would do on Church's dyno. 370whp? 380whp?