Info on "Rev-up" - Page 2 - G35Driver - Infiniti G35 & G37 Forum Discussion

Oct 26, 2005 | 01:18 PM

#16

brasil

Registered User

Joined: Jul 2005

Posts: 154

Likes: 0

ZXI, what kind of 1/4 mile times are you running with your mods? I would assume with traction, you shoudl be running 13.6's at 103 - 105?

Oct 26, 2005 | 05:35 PM

#17

jwg35c

Registered User

Joined: Jul 2004

Posts: 119

Likes: 0

From: Arlington Tx.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZXiMan

I beg to differ... On my '05 6MT G35 sedan

I have a Crawford plenum and it works better than I expected. I dyno consistantly 282-285hp and 264-266 pft torque to the wheels on a dynojet 248E with the mods below.

Crawford plenum
Crawford hi-flow cats
Crawford headers
cleaned up throttlebody
cleaned up lower plenum
Fujitsubo Legalis-R exhaust system
UR underdrive crank pulley
JWT pop-charger

I lost power and performance with only one mod I tried (UTR Y-pipe)

I would say that the '05 rev-up cars respond (much) *BETTER* to mods than the non rev-up cars. And yes, I have modded both (an '04 6MT G35 Coupe and a base '04 350Z). Modding the '04s was a huge dissapointment!

All I said was that the rev-up engines have not responded well to the PLENUM mods. Many dynos have proven this. Even the plenum manufactures have agreed with that statement. Did you do a before and after dyno with just the plenum? If not how could you possibly know the effect?

Oct 26, 2005 | 05:45 PM

#18

EricIsKlumzyee

Former G35driver Vendor

iTrader: (93)

Joined: Sep 2004

Posts: 9,524

Likes: 3

From: So. Cali - Rowland Hts

i would have to agree with them.. its harder to see any real gains in peak numbers by moding the plenum alone..

ZXiMan would you share a dyno sheet? i'd like to compair the graph of your curve to some of ours