Engine, Drivetrain & Forced-Induction Have Technical Questions or Done Modifications to the G35? Find out the answer in here! (View All Posts)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Power Duct cover back on after MD spacer install

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Mar 5, 2006 | 09:35 PM
  #1  
DaveB's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,573
Likes: 72
From: Kansas City
Power Duct cover back on after MD spacer install

After installing my 5/16" spacer I noticed slightly reduced throttle response in the lower rpms and from a stop. I decided to put the Power Duct cover back on to see if it would improve things and it seems to have worked. The throttle response is better, but now the induction noise isn't as sexy The spacer does make the induction noise deeper and louder, but not quite as loud as I'd like. On to the Coupe midpipe I guess. Keep in mind I'm not saying the spacer hurts acceleration because at WOT, the car feels great. I just wanted to restore the throttle response in around the town driving. Since the spacer increases the plenum volume, it's only natural for the lower rpms (sub 3,000rpms) to be impacted slightly.
 

Last edited by DaveB; Mar 5, 2006 at 09:38 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2006 | 09:49 PM
  #2  
Andy2434's Avatar
Super Moderator
Staff Alumni
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 11,717
Likes: 3
From: S.F. Bay Area
Dave,

I totally agree. I had taken the PD off a few weeks ago. It seemed that low end throttle response was lagging a bit. I put the PD back on after a week. Everything was just find after that.
 
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2006 | 10:02 PM
  #3  
GeeMan's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,035
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR USA
I will probably switch back to the stock box soon. I will be curious to see if I notice any enhancement in low end torque after having the pop charger on for over a year. I hope so.
 
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2006 | 12:39 AM
  #4  
Mr_pharmD's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (77)
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,058
Likes: 0
if u want your lo end tq just get the ur crank pulleys. That should make your car more alive from the start
 
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2006 | 12:50 AM
  #5  
GeeMan's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,035
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR USA
Actually, I have it. I forgot to list it in my mods. It's one of Dave B's favorites!
 
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2006 | 02:55 AM
  #6  
CarFanatic56's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,678
Likes: 1
From: California
with the 5/16th, is there now more noticeable power/pull/torque in the lower rpms...the ones used most in city/town driving?
 
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2006 | 01:43 PM
  #7  
99atlantic's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,703
Likes: 1
i didn't notice any difference w/ low-end performance w/ the power duct on/off with my spacer install. but what i definately did notice is the change in noise (quiter w/ it on...boooo hssss). Power duct is staying off here ^_^
 
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2006 | 02:58 PM
  #8  
CarFanatic56's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,678
Likes: 1
From: California
^^ i thought the 5/16th was supposed to give more useable power, like in the lower rpms, as compared to the 1/2 spacer which gives power in the higher end?..am i wrong>
 
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2006 | 08:09 PM
  #9  
Andy2434's Avatar
Super Moderator
Staff Alumni
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 11,717
Likes: 3
From: S.F. Bay Area
Originally Posted by CarFanatic56
^^ i thought the 5/16th was supposed to give more useable power, like in the lower rpms, as compared to the 1/2 spacer which gives power in the higher end?..am i wrong>
The 1/2" spacer provides an additional 1 to 2 peak ponies, I believe.
 
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2006 | 10:54 PM
  #10  
DaveB's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,573
Likes: 72
From: Kansas City
Originally Posted by CarFanatic56
with the 5/16th, is there now more noticeable power/pull/torque in the lower rpms...the ones used most in city/town driving?
Yes, it does feel better around town. I live in Atlanta now and traffic is a bear. The spacer can be felt even under a brisk 0-50 run.
 
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2006 | 11:00 PM
  #11  
CarFanatic56's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,678
Likes: 1
From: California
^ cool thanks
 
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2006 | 11:23 PM
  #12  
madchef's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 13
From: Boston, MA
Power duct off, did the throttle response improve over time (aka did the ecu need more time to adjust?)? Or did it never change until you put it back on?
 
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2006 | 09:32 AM
  #13  
SixFive's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,873
Likes: 0
From: Philly
Good old Atlanta traffic. It was bad in 1983. What burb are you in Dave?
 
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2006 | 06:23 PM
  #14  
G35_TX's Avatar
Premier Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,671
Likes: 1
From: South
Premier Member

Originally Posted by DaveB
After installing my 5/16" spacer I noticed slightly reduced throttle response in the lower rpms and from a stop. I decided to put the Power Duct cover back on to see if it would improve things and it seems to have worked. The throttle response is better, but now the induction noise isn't as sexy The spacer does make the induction noise deeper and louder, but not quite as loud as I'd like. On to the Coupe midpipe I guess. Keep in mind I'm not saying the spacer hurts acceleration because at WOT, the car feels great. I just wanted to restore the throttle response in around the town driving. Since the spacer increases the plenum volume, it's only natural for the lower rpms (sub 3,000rpms) to be impacted slightly.
Don't say we didn't tell you so. You don't know everything.
 
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2006 | 11:21 PM
  #15  
DaveB's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,573
Likes: 72
From: Kansas City
Originally Posted by G35_TX
Don't say we didn't tell you so. You don't know everything.
Enough already. The car drove fine with and without the duct. The added volume of the spacer reduced throttle response marginally. It was to be expected. You and your elite group never made mention of this. Your group's thought was that the removal of the duct introduced a whole bunch of hot air into the airbox and that you'd be slower without the duct. Unlike you, I monitored the air intake temps and MAF readings with my OBDII logger and saw a minimal change. BTW, my car actually went quicker and faster without the duct. Go figure.
 
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:58 AM.