Just a friendly reminder

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Mar 15, 2007 | 01:34 PM
  #16  
QuadCam's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,474
Likes: 11
From: Vero Beach, FL
Originally Posted by Gilley
The only PA's I am familiar with are law firms. But some law firms are LLC's.

I know some realtors who are P.A.s, that's why I was asking. I was pretty sure that it is only for liability/asset protection, but didn't know if there were any tax implications or benefits.
 
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2007 | 08:58 PM
  #17  
roncfpz's Avatar
Florida G35 Club, General Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Originally Posted by QuadCam
I know some realtors who are P.A.s, that's why I was asking. I was pretty sure that it is only for liability/asset protection, but didn't know if there were any tax implications or benefits.
P.A. is a "Professional Association" or corporation that restricts stock ownership to licensed professionals such as attorneys, CPAs, doctors, etc. I've seen it used by realtors as well. The corporation is a separate tax paying entity unless it elects S corporation status. The S corporation election and tax treatment could provide some tax benefits but this is a tricky area of tax law. IMHO, I do not believe it offers any significant tax advantages and there are other simpler, less costly alternatives.
 
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2007 | 09:13 PM
  #18  
WILD121's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,162
Likes: 0
From: Orlando
well under the Scorp you can get around paying good portion of SE tax/FICA through profit distributions. Which is 15.3% of savings. pretty big you just have to make sure they pay themselve a reasonable wage. However there are some cost to the savings quarterly filings for 941, UCT-6 and payments for your 940. You just have to make sure the benefit out weighs the cost.

I would say LLCs are more complicated then Scorps unless its a single member LLC.
 

Last edited by WILD121; Mar 15, 2007 at 09:16 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2007 | 09:20 PM
  #19  
WILD121's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,162
Likes: 0
From: Orlando
I feel a tax debate brewing.....BRING IT RON.LOL JK.............You would kick my *** in tax knowledge. I lack much needed experience. But soon i will be a master Jedi CPA.
 
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2007 | 09:40 PM
  #20  
WILD121's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,162
Likes: 0
From: Orlando
Lets not bring up Foreign Sales Corporations or Domestic International Sales Corporation.
 
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2007 | 10:46 PM
  #21  
Gilley's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,001
Likes: 8
From: Orlando, FL
Well this tax debate went nowhere fast.
 
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2007 | 08:20 AM
  #22  
WILD121's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,162
Likes: 0
From: Orlando
RON is just Scurred.
 
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2007 | 06:17 PM
  #23  
WILD121's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,162
Likes: 0
From: Orlando
Damn i thought Ron would think this is funny i guess im wrong.
 
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2007 | 08:13 PM
  #24  
roncfpz's Avatar
Florida G35 Club, General Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Originally Posted by WILD121
well under the Scorp you can get around paying good portion of SE tax/FICA through profit distributions. Which is 15.3% of savings. pretty big you just have to make sure they pay themselve a reasonable wage. However there are some cost to the savings quarterly filings for 941, UCT-6 and payments for your 940. You just have to make sure the benefit out weighs the cost.

I would say LLCs are more complicated then Scorps unless its a single member LLC.
You better have a good basis upon which to justify a "reasonable compensation" of anything less than the maximum social security wage base. It's not a fight I would want to have with the IRS unless you have very compelling industry data to support your position.

LLCs are NOT more complicated than corporations.

Okay, enough tax talk.............now for some fun tomorrow.
 
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2007 | 09:28 PM
  #25  
WILD121's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,162
Likes: 0
From: Orlando
Originally Posted by roncfpz
You better have a good basis upon which to justify a "reasonable compensation" of anything less than the maximum social security wage base. It's not a fight I would want to have with the IRS unless you have very compelling industry data to support your position.

LLCs are NOT more complicated than corporations.

Okay, enough tax talk.............now for some fun tomorrow.

naturally
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
davizzle
Picture Share
23
Feb 4, 2018 12:41 PM
Red G Coupe
Tuner & Dyno
9
Jan 14, 2016 01:13 AM
prinny
The G-Spot
6
Nov 22, 2015 11:07 PM
gprabhu
19 Inch
3
Oct 2, 2015 05:55 PM
RWDguy4238
The G-Spot
0
Sep 30, 2015 12:13 AM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:11 PM.