Awesome December Thread
Reduction of unsprung weight can drastically improve handling, while reduction of rotational mass can drastically improve acceleration, as any weight reduction but rotational mass reduction has a much larger effect. There are tons of theories and formulas out there but the common/easy one I like to use (and have found it to be fairly accurate) is 6lbs of static weight = equivalent of 1rwhp. While 1.5lbs of Rotational mass = 1rwhp.
So in other words, if you remove your passenger seat which weighs ~60lbs. Your car would be quicker, and would theoretically accelerate as if you added 10rwhp to your car at full weight. You could also see the same effect by removing a total of 15lbs from your rotational mass (lighter wheels, tires, rotors etc.)
I think your confusing unsprung weight and rotational mass. While rotational mass does also qualify as unsprung weight you won't see exponential acceleration gains by removing unsprung weight that isn't rotational mass. Rotational mass consists of Wheels, tires, rotors, axles etc. While unsprung weight includes those along with springs, shocks etc.
Reduction of unsprung weight can drastically improve handling, while reduction of rotational mass can drastically improve acceleration, as any weight reduction but rotational mass reduction has a much larger effect. There are tons of theories and formulas out there but the common/easy one I like to use (and have found it to be fairly accurate) is 6lbs of static weight = equivalent of 1rwhp. While 1.5lbs of Rotational mass = 1rwhp.
So in other words, if you remove your passenger seat which weighs ~60lbs. Your car would be quicker, and would theoretically accelerate as if you added 10rwhp to your car at full weight. You could also see the same effect by removing a total of 15lbs from your rotational mass (lighter wheels, tires, rotors etc.)
Reduction of unsprung weight can drastically improve handling, while reduction of rotational mass can drastically improve acceleration, as any weight reduction but rotational mass reduction has a much larger effect. There are tons of theories and formulas out there but the common/easy one I like to use (and have found it to be fairly accurate) is 6lbs of static weight = equivalent of 1rwhp. While 1.5lbs of Rotational mass = 1rwhp.
So in other words, if you remove your passenger seat which weighs ~60lbs. Your car would be quicker, and would theoretically accelerate as if you added 10rwhp to your car at full weight. You could also see the same effect by removing a total of 15lbs from your rotational mass (lighter wheels, tires, rotors etc.)
Yup your aboslutly right i got confused with the 2, you have any experience with an auto cross/ track day setup running all the same size tires on a coupe? I was looking at getting some RPF1s in 18s for my track wheels and not sure if i would want to do same size all around or keep it staggered. Also any thoughts on tires to run which are the lightest and have good grip?
RYAN CHECK OUT THIS THREAD YOU MAY LIKE TO DISAGREE LOL
http://forums.350zclubofflorida.net/...ead.php?t=5878
http://forums.350zclubofflorida.net/...ead.php?t=5878
RYAN CHECK OUT THIS THREAD YOU MAY LIKE TO DISAGREE LOL
http://forums.350zclubofflorida.net/...ead.php?t=5878
http://forums.350zclubofflorida.net/...ead.php?t=5878




This makes my day go by quicker
