Forced Induction Discussion of turbos , superchargers , and nitrous upgrades on the G35

Cams & Other stuff..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Nov 4, 2009 | 12:14 PM
  #31  
ttrank's Avatar
Grocery getter
iTrader: (57)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 27,305
Likes: 190
From: Phoenix
Premier Member

How much power can the larger MAF handle? I would love to have the stock ECU deal with it all. My UTEC 91oct daily driver tune is ~530whp and race gas is 650.
 
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2009 | 07:24 PM
  #32  
TTG35forT's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 419
Likes: 3
From: Florida
Originally Posted by ttrank
How much power can the larger MAF handle? I would love to have the stock ECU deal with it all. My UTEC 91oct daily driver tune is ~530whp and race gas is 650.
The published data says that it is good to 1000 hp, though I don't know if anyone has pushed it that high. I asked Sam about it one time, and I think he has used it to tune a car in the 600+ hp range.

I was even thinking about using that MAF sensor with my F-CON in lieu of the MAP sensor. Sam did say that he did that once, but the tune took a very long time. Although the F-CON can use a MAF sensor, it is mainly geared around a MAP sensor and using a MAF sensor is not straight forward. With the Osiris, however, it should be fine because the stock ECU is configured for a MAF sensor.
 
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2009 | 07:53 PM
  #33  
Canadian's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Canada, eh?
iTrader: (21)
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,275
Likes: 13
From: Las Vegas, NV
Premier Member

Found out today that my car has quite a lot of blue smoke coming out the rear, not good. A build may be sooner than I thought
 
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2009 | 07:55 PM
  #34  
urban's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (29)
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,744
Likes: 72
From: California
Ahhh crap, I hate forced upgrades
 
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2009 | 08:07 PM
  #35  
seymore4's Avatar
Premier Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (114)
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,972
Likes: 433
From: West coast
m56
Premier Member

Originally Posted by Canadian
Found out today that my car has quite a lot of blue smoke coming out the rear, not good. A build may be sooner than I thought
I feel your pain

 
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2009 | 08:38 PM
  #36  
djamps's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,602
Likes: 75
From: Annapolis, MD
Originally Posted by TTG35forT
You may want to think about a Motordyne 5/16", AAM 5/16" or other equivalent pleum spacer. That will certainly make getting hp easier.

Ceramic coating the exhaust manifolds, turbine housings and downpipes will help keep your engine bay significantly cooler. (It will also very slightly improve turbo spoolup, but the improvement probably won't be noticable).

You should probably get 1 step colder spark plugs.

I would also suggest an oil cooler.
I saw zero HP difference after adding a spacer with FI, and in fact I lost a few lbs of tq although it could have been the weather. It's my measured experience that the spacer really only helps with NA tuning. In FI, it doesn't do squat. If you want to mess with the plenum you'll need a whole new one to make any significant difference.
 
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2009 | 04:50 PM
  #37  
silver g's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,374
Likes: 14
From: Ladera Ranch / San Clemente
Originally Posted by ttrank
How much power can the larger MAF handle? I would love to have the stock ECU deal with it all. My UTEC 91oct daily driver tune is ~530whp and race gas is 650.
Im on a stock ECU tuned by Technosquare with stock MAF and I am at 550WHP on 91 Octane. With Race Gas it would be well over 600whp with no issues. So yes it can be done...no need to run a larger MAF...Technosquare has a way around that.
 
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2009 | 08:15 PM
  #38  
djamps's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,602
Likes: 75
From: Annapolis, MD
Stock MAF maxes out by 6psi ~4000 rpm. If they tune to your WHP on that, then they are basing the entire >6psi boost portion of the tune on a single column...possible, yes...something I would do to my car? no... I'm guessing you have a RFS, because without one there's no way you could tune that kind of whp with a maxed out MAF and no MAP sensor.
 

Last edited by djamps; Nov 15, 2009 at 08:26 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2009 | 12:59 AM
  #39  
silver g's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,374
Likes: 14
From: Ladera Ranch / San Clemente
Originally Posted by djamps
Stock MAF maxes out by 6psi ~4000 rpm. If they tune to your WHP on that, then they are basing the entire >6psi boost portion of the tune on a single column...possible, yes...something I would do to my car? no... I'm guessing you have a RFS, because without one there's no way you could tune that kind of whp with a maxed out MAF and no MAP sensor.
Tadashi at Technosquare does something to increase the resolution of the stock MAF sensor...he will not say what though...his own secret. Cheston from my350Z and Rookie from here are running similar tunes by Technosquare pushing equal or more WHP than Iam on stock ECU. Yes I have a complete fuel return system. Car drives like stock with ALOT more power...3000+ miles on this tune and no problems whatsoever.
 
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2009 | 08:39 PM
  #40  
TTG35forT's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 419
Likes: 3
From: Florida
Originally Posted by djamps
I saw zero HP difference after adding a spacer with FI, and in fact I lost a few lbs of tq although it could have been the weather. It's my measured experience that the spacer really only helps with NA tuning. In FI, it doesn't do squat. If you want to mess with the plenum you'll need a whole new one to make any significant difference.
Perhaps. I started with a 5/16" spacer based on recommendations from the forums, so I can't provide a comparison to the stock plenum spacer. From there, I switched to the Cosworth intake plenum. There I saw a very noticable difference. I'm still not sure it is worth the money, but it definitely does help.
 
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2009 | 08:58 PM
  #41  
djamps's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,602
Likes: 75
From: Annapolis, MD
Originally Posted by TTG35forT
Perhaps. I started with a 5/16" spacer based on recommendations from the forums, so I can't provide a comparison to the stock plenum spacer. From there, I switched to the Cosworth intake plenum. There I saw a very noticable difference. I'm still not sure it is worth the money, but it definitely does help.
After going FI, I have before and after dyno charts with and without the spacer. With the spacer, peak HP was exactly the same, but peak tq was 9 ft/lbs less. The lack of torque could have been attributed to the weather (the runs were about 2 weeks apart but within a few degrees F.) but the difference is certainly negligible and not looking favorable.

N/A there is obvious proof of gain from a spacer in charts I've seen. It seems that gain is insignificant in F/I unless you're doing BIG HP and in that case you need a Cosworth.
 
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2009 | 07:08 PM
  #42  
seymore4's Avatar
Premier Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (114)
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,972
Likes: 433
From: West coast
m56
Premier Member

OP whatever happened with the smoke issue?
 
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2009 | 04:23 PM
  #43  
Canadian's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Canada, eh?
iTrader: (21)
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,275
Likes: 13
From: Las Vegas, NV
Premier Member

Originally Posted by seymore4
OP whatever happened with the smoke issue?
Nothing yet, it doesn't smoke all the time so I think the motor is fine but I'm not sure yet. I still haven't got the car back from my mishap at the track. See my other thread in the engine forum if you haven't yet. I should get it back this week, hopefully Wednesday or Thursday.
 
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2009 | 07:29 PM
  #44  
seymore4's Avatar
Premier Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (114)
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,972
Likes: 433
From: West coast
m56
Premier Member

Yeah I was watching that thread too. Really lucky nothing serious happened...
If you dont have a catch can you might want to check your plenum for oil getting sucked in through the PCV
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
brianuc4
Engine, Drivetrain & Forced-Induction
19
Apr 10, 2020 02:12 PM
THMotorsports
Suspension-Vendor
257
Dec 18, 2018 05:43 PM
andrewvk
Engine - Complete Motors
32
Apr 7, 2016 01:39 PM
MThawkins86
G35 Coupe V35 2003 - 07
17
Oct 24, 2015 02:07 AM
UT G35
General Tech Questions
6
Sep 3, 2015 03:58 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:42 PM.