Cams & Other stuff..
I was even thinking about using that MAF sensor with my F-CON in lieu of the MAP sensor. Sam did say that he did that once, but the tune took a very long time. Although the F-CON can use a MAF sensor, it is mainly geared around a MAP sensor and using a MAF sensor is not straight forward. With the Osiris, however, it should be fine because the stock ECU is configured for a MAF sensor.
You may want to think about a Motordyne 5/16", AAM 5/16" or other equivalent pleum spacer. That will certainly make getting hp easier.
Ceramic coating the exhaust manifolds, turbine housings and downpipes will help keep your engine bay significantly cooler. (It will also very slightly improve turbo spoolup, but the improvement probably won't be noticable).
You should probably get 1 step colder spark plugs.
I would also suggest an oil cooler.
Ceramic coating the exhaust manifolds, turbine housings and downpipes will help keep your engine bay significantly cooler. (It will also very slightly improve turbo spoolup, but the improvement probably won't be noticable).
You should probably get 1 step colder spark plugs.
I would also suggest an oil cooler.
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,374
Likes: 14
From: Ladera Ranch / San Clemente
Im on a stock ECU tuned by Technosquare with stock MAF and I am at 550WHP on 91 Octane. With Race Gas it would be well over 600whp with no issues. So yes it can be done...no need to run a larger MAF...Technosquare has a way around that.
Stock MAF maxes out by 6psi ~4000 rpm. If they tune to your WHP on that, then they are basing the entire >6psi boost portion of the tune on a single column...possible, yes...something I would do to my car? no... I'm guessing you have a RFS, because without one there's no way you could tune that kind of whp with a maxed out MAF and no MAP sensor.
Last edited by djamps; Nov 15, 2009 at 08:26 PM.
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,374
Likes: 14
From: Ladera Ranch / San Clemente
Stock MAF maxes out by 6psi ~4000 rpm. If they tune to your WHP on that, then they are basing the entire >6psi boost portion of the tune on a single column...possible, yes...something I would do to my car? no... I'm guessing you have a RFS, because without one there's no way you could tune that kind of whp with a maxed out MAF and no MAP sensor.
I saw zero HP difference after adding a spacer with FI, and in fact I lost a few lbs of tq although it could have been the weather. It's my measured experience that the spacer really only helps with NA tuning. In FI, it doesn't do squat. If you want to mess with the plenum you'll need a whole new one to make any significant difference.
Perhaps. I started with a 5/16" spacer based on recommendations from the forums, so I can't provide a comparison to the stock plenum spacer. From there, I switched to the Cosworth intake plenum. There I saw a very noticable difference. I'm still not sure it is worth the money, but it definitely does help.
N/A there is obvious proof of gain from a spacer in charts I've seen. It seems that gain is insignificant in F/I unless you're doing BIG HP and in that case you need a Cosworth.
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,275
Likes: 13
From: Las Vegas, NV

Nothing yet, it doesn't smoke all the time so I think the motor is fine but I'm not sure yet. I still haven't got the car back from my mishap at the track. See my other thread in the engine forum if you haven't yet. I should get it back this week, hopefully Wednesday or Thursday.
Yeah I was watching that thread too. Really lucky nothing serious happened...
If you dont have a catch can you might want to check your plenum for oil getting sucked in through the PCV
If you dont have a catch can you might want to check your plenum for oil getting sucked in through the PCV
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
brianuc4
Engine, Drivetrain & Forced-Induction
19
Apr 10, 2020 02:12 PM
THMotorsports
Suspension-Vendor
257
Dec 18, 2018 05:43 PM










