The G-Spot General discussion about the G Series;
G35 & G37, Coupes & Sedans

high Performance G in the future?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Apr 22, 2008 | 12:31 PM
  #31  
Lolly Baggins's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,473
Likes: 5
Originally Posted by Jeff92se
I agree. Especially when the GT-R looks nothing like the G coupe.
In my opinion, I think the GT-R looks closer to a G coupe than a 350Z.
 
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2008 | 12:37 PM
  #32  
Jeff92se's Avatar
Red Card Crew
iTrader: (24)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 37,810
Likes: 585
From: ɐʍ 'ǝlʇʇɐǝs
Premier Member

Originally Posted by Lolly Baggins
In my opinion, I think the GT-R looks closer to a G coupe than a 350Z.
There's a passing resemblence just because it's from the same maker but it's nowhere like what the M3 is to the 3 series or the Lexus IS-F is to the IS350.
 
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2008 | 12:38 PM
  #33  
OCG35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (33)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 17,181
Likes: 154
From: OC - So Cal
Originally Posted by popcornten
There already is *sort of* a highly boosted version of the 350z, the GTR which is made in small number purely for performance reasons. There is a nice gap for Nissan to enter the luxury extreme sports car segment. A 350z/370z would NEVER be competitive with the M3s and C63s of the world. This caliber of car has a near perfect 50/50 balance between performance and everyday livability, which I feel the G35 already has so that's a great foundation to build upon. All I'm saying is that Nissan has no product that can currently compete in the $50,000+ Luxo-Sport car and that their best option would be a G. 350Zs are seen as more of a younger buyer's vehicle and would not get any respect next to the luxurious, spacious cars in the segment.

Also - to all the comments about Infiniti being strictly luxury and not supposed to have a performance car, what are you talking about! If Lexus can pull off a car like the superfluous looking IS-F successfully, than Infiniti should be next in the gate. Infiniti's formula is based on a mix between performance driving with comfort, or else they're smallest engine wouldn't be a 3.5 V6 pumping out 300+ horses! That's between 70 and 106 more than the typically more expensive base competitors, so there's no doubt Infiniti is about performance driving!!!
And Acura has the NSX... Infiniti needs to step it up!
 
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2008 | 03:36 PM
  #34  
G35Ian's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,189
Likes: 2
From: South of Beantown
Originally Posted by Jeff92se
Odd, you must not have read any of the 5-10+ articles comparing the two cars back to back. You think the dimensions/performance similarities were a coincidence?? LOL. BMW OWNED that market pre-2003. Infinti was smart to target that segment/car when it introduced the G35.
I never stated the similarities were a coincidence, I just don't think that Infiniti decided to make the G because BMW OWNED the so called market before 03.

Originally Posted by Jeff92se
Your logic is that Infiniti aren't built for the performance crowd. That makes no sense went infiniti BUILT a performance coupe and sedan targeted right at the BMW 330I. Which is what? Oh right. A performance coupe/sedan.
What makes no sense is that your twisting my words...I never said Infiniti wasn't built for the performance crowd, I said they are more luxury than performance...The BMW 330i is not a performance sedan, The M5 is a performance sedan...you people act like the 330i is a fvcking rocket ship...well it's not and neither is the G
 
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2008 | 03:48 PM
  #35  
Jeff92se's Avatar
Red Card Crew
iTrader: (24)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 37,810
Likes: 585
From: ɐʍ 'ǝlʇʇɐǝs
Premier Member

Originally Posted by G35Ian
I never stated the similarities were a coincidence, I just don't think that Infiniti decided to make the G because BMW OWNED the so called market before 03.
Um again no sense. BMW onwed that market share. Infinti wanted a piece of that pie. They got a big piece.

What makes no sense is that your twisting my words...I never said Infiniti wasn't built for the performance crowd, I said they are more luxury than performance...The BMW 330i is not a performance sedan, The M5 is a performance sedan...you people act like the 330i is a fvcking rocket ship...well it's not and neither is the G
I don't have to twist them. You are doing that on your own. Since when does raw hp define a performance sedan?? At the time, the BMW 330i defined the performance sedan segment. And the new 335i has more power than some of the older m5 sedans you so highly speak of.
 
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2008 | 04:59 PM
  #36  
G35Ian's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,189
Likes: 2
From: South of Beantown
Originally Posted by Jeff92se
Um again no sense. BMW onwed that market share. Infinti wanted a piece of that pie. They got a big piece.



I don't have to twist them. You are doing that on your own. Since when does raw hp define a performance sedan?? At the time, the BMW 330i defined the performance sedan segment. And the new 335i has more power than some of the older m5 sedans you so highly speak of.

Whatever buddy this could go on all day ...your right I'm wrong keep arguing about 2003 enjoy the past
 
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2008 | 05:08 PM
  #37  
Jeff92se's Avatar
Red Card Crew
iTrader: (24)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 37,810
Likes: 585
From: ɐʍ 'ǝlʇʇɐǝs
Premier Member

Originally Posted by G35Ian
Whatever buddy this could go on all day ...your right I'm wrong keep arguing about 2003 enjoy the past

No problem. Not sure about your logic though. If Infiniti built a performance sedan IN THE PAST AKA 2003, not sure why they wouldn't do it now.

That would lead me to believe a HIGHER performance version might in the works if the market share could justify it. Just like the market justified the infinti G35 in it's initial introduction.
 
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2008 | 06:33 PM
  #38  
G35Ian's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,189
Likes: 2
From: South of Beantown
Originally Posted by Jeff92se
No problem. Not sure about your logic though. If Infiniti built a performance sedan IN THE PAST AKA 2003, not sure why they wouldn't do it now.

That would lead me to believe a HIGHER performance version might in the works if the market share could justify it. Just like the market justified the infinti G35 in it's initial introduction.

what the fvck ever
 
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2008 | 06:34 PM
  #39  
Jeff92se's Avatar
Red Card Crew
iTrader: (24)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 37,810
Likes: 585
From: ɐʍ 'ǝlʇʇɐǝs
Premier Member

Originally Posted by G35Ian
what the fvck ever

Well how do you argue that?
 
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2008 | 07:00 PM
  #40  
G35Ian's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,189
Likes: 2
From: South of Beantown
Originally Posted by Jeff92se
Well how do you argue that?
 
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2008 | 07:02 PM
  #41  
Jeff92se's Avatar
Red Card Crew
iTrader: (24)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 37,810
Likes: 585
From: ɐʍ 'ǝlʇʇɐǝs
Premier Member

Originally Posted by G35Ian
Just to let you know, I'm laughing at you, not with you.
 
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2008 | 09:26 PM
  #42  
G35Ian's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,189
Likes: 2
From: South of Beantown
Originally Posted by Jeff92se
Just to let you know, I'm laughing at you, not with you.
I figured that because I'm laughing at you as well!
 
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2008 | 01:28 AM
  #43  
Jeff92se's Avatar
Red Card Crew
iTrader: (24)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 37,810
Likes: 585
From: ɐʍ 'ǝlʇʇɐǝs
Premier Member

I don't suppose the fact that the 5.0, 390 hp V8 in the FX50 that's built on the same FM platform means anything to anyone.

Naw.
 
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2008 | 03:45 PM
  #44  
OCG35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (33)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 17,181
Likes: 154
From: OC - So Cal
Jeff, why are you continuing?... The guy clearly indicated that the he doesn't want to squabble with you anymore... yet you continue to harass... You've done it to me too... why are you so often intent on fighting with people? > It’s a rhetorical question so no need to post an answer...

Just drop it - okay.
 
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2008 | 03:51 PM
  #45  
Jeff92se's Avatar
Red Card Crew
iTrader: (24)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 37,810
Likes: 585
From: ɐʍ 'ǝlʇʇɐǝs
Premier Member

Originally Posted by OCG35
Jeff, why are you continuing?... The guy clearly indicated that the he doesn't want to squabble with you anymore... yet you continue to harass... You've done it to me too... why are you so often intent on fighting with people? > It’s a rhetorical question so no need to post an answer...

Just drop it - okay.
If he doesn't want to squabble as you put it, why has he replied to each and every post so far. Who's harassing? I feel his logic is flawed and I presented my reasons why. He on the other hand offered flames.

Here's my rhetorical reply. Perhaps you should be addressing him and not me?
 
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:20 AM.