The G-Spot General discussion about the G Series;
G35 & G37, Coupes & Sedans

Are the new Infiniti's really better?

Old Dec 1, 2016 | 02:58 PM
  #61  
Mustang5L5's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 8,818
Likes: 468
From: Taxachusetts
Originally Posted by telcoman
Just the savings on using regular gasoline vs premium, bringing your own lunch to work and making your own morning coffee instead of Starbucks are good starting points.
We debate this all the time on some of the personal finance forums I'm on. You make sacrifices in some area, to enjoy your vices in others.

The problem is everyone has a different opinion on what is worth spending money on, and where costs should be cut. Really what it all comes down to is what you feel is a priority in life.

Not everyone is going to agree with each other with this regard and from what I've seen, everyone feels their choices are the "correct" one and everyone else is wasting $$$
 
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2016 | 04:25 PM
  #62  
Deepdiver's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (20)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,643
Likes: 187
From: So Cal
^ +1 I can afford anything, I just can't afford everything!!
 
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2016 | 04:37 PM
  #63  
Urbanengineer's Avatar
Super Moderator
10 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 11,174
Likes: 1,045
From: OH-IO
Premier Member

Originally Posted by ScraggleRock
Did you actually do the math when you say you got worse mileage? Cuz usually you'd get a little better mileage cuz there's more additives in premium that obviously don't store as much energy as gasoline. Of course I live in CA so our EPA gas may be different.
Premium got better fuel economy, and was worth an extra $4 a tank. 89 lost a reasonable amount of MPG and 87 just barely achieved 10 mpg.
 
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2016 | 04:50 PM
  #64  
Texasscout's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (11)
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 35,605
Likes: 2,116
From: South Texas
I tried 93 in my Frontier and it made no difference at all. I run 89 in the G and 93 (required) in the Q50
 
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2016 | 09:00 AM
  #65  
Justice06RR's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 553
Likes: 29
Originally Posted by Urbanengineer
I'll be excited to buy an Infiniti after graduation once my small amount of school loans left are paid off. Only problem is that I may only be able to buy the I4 turbo Q60 ! The V6 turbo is around 42k+ other costs.

And FWIW, I would recommend trying other octane levels to see what gets good gas mileage and performance. I tried the 87/89 routes and unfortunately lost a significant amount of mileage per tank (drop in MPG).

Not the same story for other vehicles though... this one gets the same performance and mileage on 87 as it does on 93 pump gas, I checked on a dyno.
Interesting.

So you are using 87 on your sportbike? I always use premium on mine and since it doesn't cost much to fill up a bike anyway. I'm a bit weary of using regular on a sportbike, but it has crossed my mind.

Originally Posted by Urbanengineer
Premium got better fuel economy, and was worth an extra $4 a tank. 89 lost a reasonable amount of MPG and 87 just barely achieved 10 mpg.
Good to know.
 
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2016 | 11:20 AM
  #66  
Mustang5L5's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 8,818
Likes: 468
From: Taxachusetts
I know my lawn care equipment doesn't run well on 87 octane
 
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2016 | 11:36 AM
  #67  
Peoria35sedan's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 436
Likes: 61
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by telcoman
Is there a requirement that one has to be young, inexperienced, wasteful, and sometimes stupid putting excessive sums of money into a depreciating vehicle?
Telcoman
You assume all of that and couldn't be more wrong. The fact that you think of a vehicle as an asset just proves my point, I drive a G because I enjoy the experience, I like the old school feeling the car delivers and that's the point of this thread and for many this website, you've missed the point of both.
FWIW - I was alive when the first Mustang rolled of the assembly line, have owned, raced many cars & bikes and race them in several disciplines, am the sole provider for my wife and two children and have invested much less than the original msrp into the G and it has served me well for nearly 250,000 miles over the last 10 years.
Have a good day
 

Last edited by Peoria35sedan; Dec 5, 2016 at 11:42 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2016 | 12:49 PM
  #68  
Urbanengineer's Avatar
Super Moderator
10 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 11,174
Likes: 1,045
From: OH-IO
Premier Member

Originally Posted by Justice06RR
Interesting.

So you are using 87 on your sportbike? I always use premium on mine and since it doesn't cost much to fill up a bike anyway. I'm a bit weary of using regular on a sportbike, but it has crossed my mind.Good to know.
Read the label. Most of all Suzukis are 87 octane [(R+M)/2].

From a GSXR forum: "the only time you should be using premium is if you changed the compression of your bike (600) or if you specifically tuned it for that gas..."

There really isn't a difference for street vehicles in terms of octane. Just Anti knock rating. Run as low as you can go (octane) with the best economy. This is why Telcoman runs 87. If it works on your vehicle, great!
 
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2016 | 12:49 PM
  #69  
Urbanengineer's Avatar
Super Moderator
10 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 11,174
Likes: 1,045
From: OH-IO
Premier Member

Originally Posted by Mustang5L5
I know my lawn care equipment doesn't run well on 87 octane
Yeah you need leaded for those /s.
 
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2016 | 01:45 PM
  #70  
Justice06RR's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 553
Likes: 29
Originally Posted by Urbanengineer
Read the label. Most of all Suzukis are 87 octane [(R+M)/2].

From a GSXR forum: "the only time you should be using premium is if you changed the compression of your bike (600) or if you specifically tuned it for that gas..."

There really isn't a difference for street vehicles in terms of octane. Just Anti knock rating. Run as low as you can go (octane) with the best economy. This is why Telcoman runs 87. If it works on your vehicle, great!
I get that, but I tend to follow manufacturer recommendations on my vehicles. Specially On high performance vehicles with higher compression. On regular cars that only need 87, that's what I go with.
 
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2016 | 05:55 PM
  #71  
Texasscout's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (11)
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 35,605
Likes: 2,116
From: South Texas
Originally Posted by Telcoman
Is there a requirement that one has to be young, inexperienced, wasteful, and sometimes stupid putting excessive sums of money into a depreciating vehicle?
Telcoman
This from a guy that probably owns $3000 in fly fishing gear or a set of Carbon Graphite shafted clubs.

Owning this old car is now a HOBBY. Just like my Amateur Radio. Heck, I probably have $20-30,000 tied up in radio gear. Then there's my gun collection....
 
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2016 | 11:02 PM
  #72  
Urbanengineer's Avatar
Super Moderator
10 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 11,174
Likes: 1,045
From: OH-IO
Premier Member

Yeah I like the car a lot though. I like the driving experience way more then my sisters 2012 Camry... even though they are faster!
 
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2016 | 02:26 AM
  #73  
ScraggleRock's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 6,811
Likes: 738
Originally Posted by Urbanengineer
Yeah I like the car a lot though. I like the driving experience way more then my sisters 2012 Camry... even though they are faster!
Ha! No.. They aren't
 
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2016 | 05:35 AM
  #74  
Blue Dream's Avatar
I drove ttrank's car solo
iTrader: (50)
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 18,299
Likes: 1,488
From: By the sea, Tx
G35 sedan w/ too much money in mods
Premier Member

Ummm depending what review you look at, yes it is. Close on most but I've seen Camry at 5.8 sec. 0-60 and G35 at 6.2 sec. Not a big difference but the bottom line I think urban was making is they're both relatively quick but the G is hella more fun to drive!!
 
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2016 | 12:00 PM
  #75  
Mignav01's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 609
Likes: 54
Originally Posted by ScraggleRock
Ha! No.. They aren't
V6 Cary and accords are catching up my friend. Although one is a cool car, the others are pretty boring. I still get people asking if my car is a 12 or 13 MY, goes to show how modern our rides still look
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:20 PM.