G35 Coupe V35 2003 - 07 Discussion about the 1st Generation V35 G35 Coupe

Went to the race track again...1/4 time slips!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Oct 31, 2006 | 03:48 PM
  #16  
Jeff92se's Avatar
Red Card Crew
iTrader: (24)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 37,810
Likes: 585
From: ɐʍ 'ǝlʇʇɐǝs
Premier Member

Well yes and no. There's debate whether the SAFC can hold changes vs the ecu trying to revert back. I think that's what you are mentioning.

But for WOT, the ecu doesn't have the ability to make changes. This is open loop and the ecu uses preprogramed ign/fuel tables using the maf and TB I believe. So in a way, a/f tuing is needed if your breathing mods can indeed make the engine run lean at wot situations. But for anything less than wot, the ecu should be able to trim the appropiate a/f using the o2s.

Originally Posted by trey.hutcheson
I personally don't like the idea of using an afc on our cars. The stock ecu changes maps on the fly, according to its own logic. A tune with an afc is unreliable, unpredictable, and unrepeatable at best. At worst, it's an excessively lean condition waiting to happen.
 
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2006 | 05:22 PM
  #17  
trey.hutcheson's Avatar
Staff Alumni
Staff Alumni
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,521
Likes: 2
From: Birmingham AL
Originally Posted by Jeff92se
Well yes and no. There's debate whether the SAFC can hold changes vs the ecu trying to revert back. I think that's what you are mentioning.

But for WOT, the ecu doesn't have the ability to make changes. This is open loop and the ecu uses preprogramed ign/fuel tables using the maf and TB I believe. So in a way, a/f tuing is needed if your breathing mods can indeed make the engine run lean at wot situations. But for anything less than wot, the ecu should be able to trim the appropiate a/f using the o2s.
Right - I didn't mean open loop. I specifically meant closed loop. Do these things tap into the throttle position wire and have adjustable load sites or what?
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2006 | 12:18 AM
  #18  
logik05se's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,133
Likes: 0
sick sick numbers man im glad to see that....i was gonna run my 06 6mt for the first time at the track( and my first time ever) last sunday but someone drove my car and smacked it up. So maybe im gonna go in like 2 weeks. Just out of curiosity I see you have an auto...did you use manual mode or just D....manual mode im assuming.
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2006 | 01:08 AM
  #19  
Jeff92se's Avatar
Red Card Crew
iTrader: (24)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 37,810
Likes: 585
From: ɐʍ 'ǝlʇʇɐǝs
Premier Member

As in engine load? No. Just rpm based. You can +/- fuel in % in diff rpm increments. It's not as sophisticated as Emanage/utec/ etc. But it's a step ahead of some of the crude a/f management for some of the sc packages. Don't some still use a fuel pressure regulator type adjustment?

Originally Posted by trey.hutcheson
Right - I didn't mean open loop. I specifically meant closed loop. Do these things tap into the throttle position wire and have adjustable load sites or what?
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2006 | 09:56 AM
  #20  
trey.hutcheson's Avatar
Staff Alumni
Staff Alumni
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,521
Likes: 2
From: Birmingham AL
Originally Posted by Jeff92se
As in engine load? No. Just rpm based. You can +/- fuel in % in diff rpm increments. It's not as sophisticated as Emanage/utec/ etc. But it's a step ahead of some of the crude a/f management for some of the sc packages. Don't some still use a fuel pressure regulator type adjustment?
Yeah, I meant engine load. Without parameterized engine load, an afc's "tune" will be static(I don't mean rpm based); meaning that it will be tinkering with maf signals under light throttle, half, full, clutch-in, etc.

And I assume you're referring to whatever the fmu is that comes with the vortech or procharger. I don't have any experience with that.
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2006 | 01:54 PM
  #21  
Jeff92se's Avatar
Red Card Crew
iTrader: (24)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 37,810
Likes: 585
From: ɐʍ 'ǝlʇʇɐǝs
Premier Member

I'm not sure on that actually. The SAFC is just intercepting the maf signal and the ecu is manlipulating the a/f based on that. I think the safc is making the change on top of any load based changes being made. So if the ecu as run all it's calculations and spit out a xx%, the safc is taking that % and attaching a -/+ % on top. But the question is when you force the % too lean/rich, does the 02 sensor pick that up and try to fight your adjustment.

From what I read about one of the standalones, you are actually inputing in direct %s into a table. So in that sense, you are making the a/f static and non-adjustable. Unless that table is just a starting point in closed loop. ie.. ecu uses that % and if the 02 picks up something lean/rich, it will adjust from there. vs starting from a lean point and having to adjust rich.

Or I could be 100% wrong. haha

I'm really waiting to see what Cobb is going to come up with. The reflashing sounds exciting.

Originally Posted by trey.hutcheson
I personally don't like the idea of using an afc on our cars. The stock ecu changes maps on the fly, according to its own logic. A tune with an afc is unreliable, unpredictable, and unrepeatable at best. At worst, it's an excessively lean condition waiting to happen.
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2006 | 01:59 PM
  #22  
ttrank's Avatar
Grocery getter
iTrader: (57)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 27,305
Likes: 190
From: Phoenix
Premier Member

Nice work. Very consistent, you should enter some of the bracket races.
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2006 | 02:25 PM
  #23  
Nismo G's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (21)
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,244
Likes: 23
From: Austin, Texas
Originally Posted by ttrank
Nice work. Very consistent, you should enter some of the bracket races.
I was thinking about it, but i dont know where to sign up at...




Also, to all the guys talking about the AFC on my car i have no idea what any of you are talking about haha but i know it did help.
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2006 | 02:52 PM
  #24  
Bryant's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Nice runs! Out of all your mods, which one made the most difference?
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2006 | 04:13 PM
  #25  
Nismo G's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (21)
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,244
Likes: 23
From: Austin, Texas
Originally Posted by Bryant
Nice runs! Out of all your mods, which one made the most difference?
I think i told everyone that i think my AFC made the biggest difference. Something was messed up in the engine and i was only dynoing 190 odd something HP they installed that and the guy got in there and was tuning it here and there and then i was putting 140 something HP. So if it wasnt for the AFC i would have been the slowest G out there....
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2006 | 05:59 PM
  #26  
G-MENTED's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,719
Likes: 1
From: The Bay
i agree. i wouldnt use an afc.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
joel extreme
SOCAL Meetings & Events
1
Jul 27, 2015 11:59 PM
newg37
G35 Coupe V35 2003 - 07
1
Jul 26, 2015 09:32 AM
joel extreme
SOCAL Meetings & Events
3
Jul 23, 2015 04:13 AM
quickspeed6
Engine, Drivetrain & Forced-Induction
24
Jul 15, 2015 11:06 AM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:03 AM.