What's a better deal? 04 for 19k 05 20k
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Pyroalter
Best of luck! Can't wait to see some pics 
Originally Posted by xplicit
Agreed, but the only thing that bugs me about the 05 is that it was a old guy as a driver, 1 owner which was him and theres some rust on the rotor on the rear left drivers side 
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
just use your own judgment, compare both cars interior, exterior, tires, engine ect.. you spend 1k more for newer model but add 9k miles to the engine.. compare to the 04, 1k less but -9k miles to the engine.. so both are good deal.
yeah 1 old guy owner is a good thing....way better than if some 20 something yr old owned it....also rotors will begin to rust if it isn't driven in awhile...mine do all the time
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: Orland Park, IL
Originally Posted by xplicit
Agreed, but the only thing that bugs me about the 05 is that it was a old guy as a driver, 1 owner which was him
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 934
Likes: 4
From: Charlotte, NC and Central Virginia
Originally Posted by snou52
yeah 1 old guy owner is a good thing....way better than if some 20 something yr old owned it....also rotors will begin to rust if it isn't driven in awhile...mine do all the time
OP, i would def. recommend the 05
Originally Posted by azng45
just use your own judgment, compare both cars interior, exterior, tires, engine ect.. you spend 1k more for newer model but add 9k miles to the engine.. compare to the 04, 1k less but -9k miles to the engine.. so both are good deal.
cars in detail, pop the hood does the engine look tired and has it spent it's
life outside and not garaged. Do a Car fax check using the vin numbers to
check the history of both cars. I wouldn't use the nav if I had it because
I know where I'm going and the nav is generally 40% incorrect....
Gary
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post