What's a better deal? 04 for 19k 05 20k
#16
08-29-2008, 01:07 PM
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#17
08-29-2008, 01:09 PM
Originally Posted by xplicit
Agreed, but the only thing that bugs me about the 05 is that it was a old guy as a driver, 1 owner which was him and theres some rust on the rotor on the rear left drivers side 
#18
08-29-2008, 01:17 PM
#20
08-29-2008, 06:20 PM
#21
08-31-2008, 03:50 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Orland Park, IL
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#22
08-31-2008, 11:57 PM
#23
09-01-2008, 12:56 AM
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Charlotte, NC and Central Virginia
Posts: 934
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Originally Posted by snou52
yeah 1 old guy owner is a good thing....way better than if some 20 something yr old owned it....also rotors will begin to rust if it isn't driven in awhile...mine do all the time
OP, i would def. recommend the 05
#24
09-01-2008, 01:13 AM
Originally Posted by azng45
just use your own judgment, compare both cars interior, exterior, tires, engine ect.. you spend 1k more for newer model but add 9k miles to the engine.. compare to the 04, 1k less but -9k miles to the engine.. so both are good deal.
cars in detail, pop the hood does the engine look tired and has it spent it's
life outside and not garaged. Do a Car fax check using the vin numbers to
check the history of both cars. I wouldn't use the nav if I had it because
I know where I'm going and the nav is generally 40% incorrect....
Gary
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post