G35 Coupe V35 2003 - 07 Discussion about the 1st Generation V35 G35 Coupe

Unleaded or Premium gas?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Dec 2, 2008 | 12:26 PM
  #16  
jfisher's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati
Both 87 and 93 are unleaded so your title doesn't really make sense. The ECU was tuned for premium fuel, so that is what I would run.
 
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2008 | 01:08 PM
  #17  
Roguewolf's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,615
Likes: 0
From: VA
hahaha 91 is as low as u should EVER go.. since some areas dont have 93 but it's 3 dollars.. if ur in that big of a grind u should try and sell ur car before u hit the required service maintenance.
 
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2008 | 01:10 PM
  #18  
partyman66's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,560
Likes: 228
From: Southeastern Mass.
All gas sold in the U.S. is unleaded nowadays. Back in early days of the automotive industry(early 80's and prior), many vehicles ran on gas that had lead in it as an anti-knock agent(it increased the octane rating of the fuel)... but they started phasing leaded gasoline out of street cars because of the significant health risk that it posed to the general public due to the fact that thousands of tons of lead were beign pumped into the atmosphere every year by cars running on leaded fuel.

It's illegal today to run leaded fuel on public roads in any vehicle... so all gas that you buy is in fact "unleaded".

Premium is what you want in your car for a fuel grade though. Our motors were designed to operate at peak efficiency using fuel with an octane rating of 91+. The car will run on 87 octane fuel, and it won't sputter or stall or anything that drastic... but it will lose a little power and fuel economy since the ECU will be accounting for detected operating conditions not being optimal with the lower grade of fuel(anti-knock measures such as timing retardation, etc).

Sure... you could go save $3 a fillup by using 87 octane instead of premium, but it's not worth it because if you get 2 MPG less per gallon over the course of your fillup, you will have lost more than $3 worth of gas in the overall tank milleage.. which will account for the initial $3 savings and then some... only you will have wasted more gas to drive the same distance as another guy who was using the right fuel grade in his G35. So it's a triple negative... you waste more gas to travel the same miles, you spend the same or more to do it, and your car is going to be slower.
 

Last edited by partyman66; Dec 2, 2008 at 01:35 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2008 | 01:23 PM
  #19  
gamerluke's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Man every time someone brings this up you guys are so harsh!

Side note, where do you get gas that's not 10% ethanol? All my Chevrons and Shells always say "e10 ethanol blend" on the pumps, and from November-February they winterize (whatever that means) too, making my mileage even worse.
 
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2008 | 01:41 PM
  #20  
silver g's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,374
Likes: 14
From: Ladera Ranch / San Clemente
91 or higher only
 
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2008 | 02:01 PM
  #21  
Derzigster's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
From: So Cal
I believe that Premium is recomended for the Automatic's but is required on the 6MT rev up engines.
 
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2008 | 02:13 PM
  #22  
Darkstar752's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,142
Likes: 29
From: Bethlehem, PA
If you really want to save money, sell this car and buy a Civic.

Risking engine damage for saving a little over 100 a year is ridiculous to me... how can people be so stupid
 
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2008 | 02:25 PM
  #23  
ThatOneDude's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,611
Likes: 182
From: WASHINGTON STATE
Originally Posted by Darkstar752
If you really want to save money, sell this car and buy a Civic.

Risking engine damage for saving a little over 100 a year is ridiculous to me... how can people be so stupid
You don't want to save money? Obviously, he has a G35 and wants to keep it - does that mean he doesn't have the right to save money? I sure hope you buy only the best parts for your car, then.
 
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2008 | 02:39 PM
  #24  
crazeejitt's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
is there not a sticker on your gas tank lid?
 
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2008 | 02:59 PM
  #25  
jfisher's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati
Originally Posted by ThatOneDude
You don't want to save money? Obviously, he has a G35 and wants to keep it - does that mean he doesn't have the right to save money? I sure hope you buy only the best parts for your car, then.
At the cost of losing mileage and have the car running poorer?? No thanks...
 
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2008 | 03:22 PM
  #26  
azng45's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Darkstar752
If you really want to save money, sell this car and buy a Civic.

Risking engine damage for saving a little over 100 a year is ridiculous to me... how can people be so stupid


baller talk!!!
 
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2008 | 04:06 PM
  #27  
Solekeeper's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
From: South Fla.
Originally Posted by GEE35X
Read your manual.
You are not talking a lot of difference in money per week. If you really can't afford it just sell the car and purchase something much more economical.



My thoughts exactly.
 
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2008 | 04:12 PM
  #28  
LaConic's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 136
Likes: 1
From: Cen Cal -by the beach
wish we had 93!! cali only has 91..

i wouldnt recommend 87..as simply explained in this thread
i was told u can run 89 (dealer)...but not if u drive ur G as "u" should LOL

then again maybe he's asking because in some states. its 89.91.93...?
in texas it was like that
in cali its 87.89.91...so which octane are u asking to run exactly?
the difference at the pump isnt that noticeable moneywise
 
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2008 | 05:12 PM
  #29  
056MT14's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
87 really isn't worth it. $12 a month, but you won't be happy with the car. To me, $12 is not worth having a car that i won't enjoy driving. Some guy pumped my gas while I went inside to buy something and when I came out, I saw he was pumping 87 and I flipped, and from the 1st start up, I could feel a drastic difference on the way home.
 
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2008 | 05:39 PM
  #30  
Dan_K's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,471
Likes: 0
Put whatever you want.

Luxury/Higher Performance cars will say premium required, but they can all run 87 without any problems (with the exception of a few, ie. supercars). If they just programmed the ECU for 91+, that would be a big lawsuit waiting to happen. Just because people buy these cars doesn't mean they know anything about how they work.

Of course, all the HP/TQ and MPG figures in the official specs will be derived from premium gas.
 
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:14 AM.