G35 Coupe V35 2003 - 07 Discussion about the 1st Generation V35 G35 Coupe

Does A/T Really have more TORQUE than M/T??????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #31  
Old 10-19-2010, 11:42 AM
Hammerhead i-Eagle Thrust's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 2,891
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
04 350z touring 3247lbs, 04 350z roadster 3462lbs, 07 350z grand touring 3404lbs

e46 M3 3415

04 G35 sedan 6MT 3398lbs (52/48 weight balance) Coupe 6mt 3435 (53/47)

if the G is overweight, the z is as well and the z roadster if obese

350z arent very fast either

2001 M3
skidpad .89
600-ft slalom, mph 68.99
Braking, 60-0 mph, ft 111

2003 G35 coupe
Skidpad, g 0.87
Braking, 60-0 mph, ft 112 (6MT sedan 110ft)
600-ft slalom, mph 67.1
0-60 mph, sec 5.82 (6mt sedan 5.78)
1/4 mile, sec @ mph 14.23 @ 99.4 (6MT sedan 14.28 @ 100.3)

2003 350z Track
Braking, 60-0 mph, ft 116
1/4 mile, sec @ mph 14.0 @ 101.2
0-60 mph, sec 5.5
600-ft slalom, mph 69.7
200-ft skidpad, lateral g 0.86


like I said, if the z is a sports car, the G is a sports car
 
  #32  
Old 10-19-2010, 11:54 AM
herrschaft's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Coast
Posts: 7,738
Received 770 Likes on 604 Posts
^reference?
 
  #33  
Old 10-19-2010, 12:02 PM
Canadian's Avatar
Canada, eh?

iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 4,275
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts
You can compare numbers all day.. I never said anything about their numbers on paper. The fact is the Z and M3 are more performance orientated, marketed as sports cars. I know I speak for the majority here that the G35 is an entry level luxury sports coupe. It is NOT classified as a "sports car".
 
  #34  
Old 10-19-2010, 12:05 PM
Calvin's Avatar
Overglorified Altima
iTrader: (65)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 53,506
Received 187 Likes on 128 Posts
Originally Posted by codeflux
G is not a sport car (or even sports car). you want a sports car - buy a porsche. </troll>
This.
 
  #35  
Old 10-19-2010, 12:06 PM
Hammerhead i-Eagle Thrust's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 2,891
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
motortrend

marketed is the key word here

if the word skyline was on it, then it would be a sports car..lol

and dont get me wrong, I am not talking highly of the G here, I am saying its too close to the performance of many past sports cars to not be considered one

too many older cars that were "marketed" as sports cars have performace that is way too similar or worse then the G. C4 corvette, 300zx 2+2 was a cow, miatas are super slow as are MR2s, the CR-Z is a sports hybrid rofl, the maxima is a 4DSC(if anything is a 4DSC its the G sedan or some BMW sedan, certainly not the maxima), pontiac solstice/saturn sky?, NA Supra, and even the TT supra stock for stock isnt all that impressive, e36 m3 etc
 

Last edited by Hammerhead i-Eagle Thrust; 10-19-2010 at 12:14 PM.
  #36  
Old 10-19-2010, 12:08 PM
M302_Imola's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jsdrn
Nissan GTR is auto trans, Lexus ISF is auto trans, Ferrari 599 has an f1 sequential auto trans option. BMW M series offer auto trans. The point behind these high end cars having an auto trans is that they can shift faster. That being said, i still prefer driving a stick.
Just because they offer it doesn't mean you should get it.
 
  #37  
Old 10-19-2010, 12:15 PM
Canadian's Avatar
Canada, eh?

iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 4,275
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by Hammerhead i-Eagle Thrust
motortrend

marketed is the key word here

if the word skyline was on it, then it would be a sports car..lol

and dont get me wrong, I am not talking highly of the G here, I am saying its too close to the performance of many past sports cars to not be considered one
I am talking about the manufacturer.. Not a magazine. Nissan markets the Z as a sports car. The Toyota Corrolla probably has better performance numbers than probably most true sport cars in the 70s and 80s. Does that mean it's a sports car? Numbers don't classify a car. Is a Porsche Cayenne a sports car? No.
 
  #38  
Old 10-19-2010, 12:19 PM
Hammerhead i-Eagle Thrust's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 2,891
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
the corolla may out accelerate some old sports cars, but it isnt rwd or awd, nor is it interesting or fun to drive. The G is pretty amusing to drive
 
  #39  
Old 10-19-2010, 12:19 PM
Canadian's Avatar
Canada, eh?

iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 4,275
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts
Lol no point in continuing this endless debate.. We can agree to disagree
 
  #40  
Old 10-19-2010, 12:27 PM
Jairen's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Bremerton, Wa
Posts: 3,544
Received 149 Likes on 113 Posts
Originally Posted by Hammerhead i-Eagle Thrust
04 350z touring 3247lbs, 04 350z roadster 3462lbs, 07 350z grand touring 3404lbs

e46 M3 3415

04 G35 sedan 6MT 3398lbs (52/48 weight balance) Coupe 6mt 3435 (53/47)

if the G is overweight, the z is as well and the z roadster if obese

350z arent very fast either

2001 M3
skidpad .89
600-ft slalom, mph 68.99
Braking, 60-0 mph, ft 111

2003 G35 coupe
Skidpad, g 0.87
Braking, 60-0 mph, ft 112 (6MT sedan 110ft)
600-ft slalom, mph 67.1
0-60 mph, sec 5.82 (6mt sedan 5.78)
1/4 mile, sec @ mph 14.23 @ 99.4 (6MT sedan 14.28 @ 100.3)

2003 350z Track
Braking, 60-0 mph, ft 116
1/4 mile, sec @ mph 14.0 @ 101.2
0-60 mph, sec 5.5
600-ft slalom, mph 69.7
200-ft skidpad, lateral g 0.86


like I said, if the z is a sports car, the G is a sports car
I have to agree on the G and Z being similiar in straight line performance. I track at the dragstrip way too often (at least twice a month) and we usually race each other (G's and Z's, auto and manual) and it all comes down to the driver. Edge goes to the Z due to it's lighter driveshaft. The 03 base models are also pretty light at around 3100 lbs.

One would think a 50lb weight difference is significant but in fact, it ISN'T. Not in a car that has close to 300 crank hp. With our cars, anything less than a 100lb difference isn't really that significant. That can be made up in driver weight and the amount of fuel in the tank. If you have a fat driver in the Z and a skinny driver in a G, the weight difference goes out the door in a straight line. I'm sorry if people disagree with me, but a 50lb weight difference does not make your car significantly "faster" in a straight line.

As for track numbers, they are like dyno's. You can't really compare 0-60, 1/4 mile numbers, etc unless it is done on the same track on the same day IMHO. If test "A" is done in 100 degree heat with a 3000 ft elevation and test "B" is done in cool weather at sea level, the numbers will be significantly different. One thing magazines don't post is the DA (Density Altitude).
 
  #41  
Old 10-19-2010, 12:37 PM
Hammerhead i-Eagle Thrust's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 2,891
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
exactly

the difference between the z and the g in the 1/4 is less then the difference between runs in the same car for many drivers
 
  #42  
Old 10-19-2010, 12:46 PM
G2FLIP4's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,119
Received 61 Likes on 40 Posts
everything
Why do stupid threads like this go on for pages? AT vs MT and 2DR vs 4DR threads shouldnt be allowed on this site. Nothing but a bunch of fu(king idiots arguing with each other on the Internet.

 
  #43  
Old 10-19-2010, 12:47 PM
Hammerhead i-Eagle Thrust's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 2,891
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by G2FLIP4
Why do stupid threads like this go on for pages? AT vs MT and 2DR vs 4DR threads shouldnt be allowed on this site. Nothing but a bunch of fu(king idiots arguing with each other on the Internet.

penor?
 
  #44  
Old 10-19-2010, 12:53 PM
jon121587@yahoo's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Los Lunas NM
Posts: 199
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by G2FLIP4
Why do stupid threads like this go on for pages? AT vs MT and 2DR vs 4DR threads shouldnt be allowed on this site. Nothing but a bunch of fu(king idiots arguing with each other on the Internet.

I guess u can blame me for it but i jus wanted a straight answer LMAO Not no debate but i should have snapped. Any ways to all i love my 5A/T and i thinkl its a sports entry car and dont care what any body thinks
 
  #45  
Old 10-19-2010, 01:04 PM
nghiars's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: SoCal 714
Posts: 5,342
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
The G is actually defined as a GT. Grand Touring. there are some true sports cars.. like a ferrari or lambo. viper, lotus elise.
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Does A/T Really have more TORQUE than M/T??????



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:32 PM.