G35 Coupe V35 2003 - 07 Discussion about the 1st Generation V35 G35 Coupe

Will I get smoked by my brothers new 04 mustang GT?

Old Feb 2, 2005 | 02:10 AM
  #46  
EX-250's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
For some reason my sig decided not to show up with mods.... Hopefully it will this time.
 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2005 | 07:57 AM
  #47  
neffster's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 8,269
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by DTrejo
...Intake plenum (I would recommend to get one that allows you to keep your engine cover)...
Why would you want to keep your engine cover on? At a 1/4 mile track most people raise their hoods to allow their vehicles to cool off. The engine cover would help to trap heat in, raising air intake temperatures (albeit only slightly).

What aftermarket plenum allows you to get MAXIMUM performance and keep your stock cover on?
 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2005 | 08:37 AM
  #48  
SkylineG33's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by coolsk8er
It makes me laugh when people take the HP numbers from 2 cars and divide the HP by the respective weights and say one is faster than the other because the power-to-weight ratio is higher, while ignoring things like toruge, gearing, drivetrain, powerband, etc.
Regarding the power-to-weight ratios, you shouldn't take those so seriously...they are simply for reference to measure the difference in power of both vehicles to give a general idea on how each will perform versus another. Of course it does not factor in everything and nothing is stated as fact, but the point that was made was that it will be a close one between an '04 GT and '03 G Coupe stock for stock. Again, it's a simple generalization to eliminate other factors just to gain some reference. That's why they are estimates/approximations...gotta keep it simple ya know? There are just too many darn factors involved...making it complicated will just create another debate and make this thread longer than necessary. Have to remember that the original question is '04 Mustang and '03 G Coupe...gotta keep it within scope of the question.
 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2005 | 08:38 AM
  #49  
madchef's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 13
From: Boston, MA
oops, sorry man, I read '05 GT for some reason. You should have no prob beating an '04.

Oh, and what a deal your buddy got!! $9,000 off because its a "leftover"...amazing.
 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2005 | 08:39 AM
  #50  
EX-250's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
My main reason for liking the Crawford is the fact that its metal (I believe aluminum? correct me if I'm wrong.) Picked up a little trick years back from watching old S/C'd muscle cars running. They put ice on the top of the manifold... why? To make it and the air coming in colder. Just for fun, I took a zip lock, turned my car on, PACKED It with snow about a week ago to see what would happen. My temp gague in the car said it was heated to operating temp, yet my plenum was so cold you couldnt keep your hand down on it. I dont know how much of a benefit this is NA (compared to a SC'd setup) but theres my personal reason for liking the crawford and never wanting that giant heat soak of an engine cover back in.
 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2005 | 09:26 AM
  #51  
ComptechRSX's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
From: Huntingtion Beach, CA
I must say that the Mustang shifter fell is absolute crap. When i drove one i couldnt even figure out what gear i was in.
 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2005 | 09:35 AM
  #52  
clokwork's Avatar
Cmon Son!
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,328
Likes: 0
From: NoVA
Originally Posted by ChazM
Man, I didn't realize how cocky some of the G drivers are....first off, the GT 5spd will run low 14's, easily. A 6mt G will run about the same and the 5AT puts less power to the ground via drivetrain loss and will net slower ET's. And to the guy who put the power to weight ratio....learn to account for all factors of power for a car...the GT puts 302 lbs/torque! It has loads of low end power. Honestly, I say just race your friend but I'm thinking you will lose...not by much, maybe a car length or 2 by 80mph.

Not by much.....a car length or 2.....thats funny..
 

Last edited by clokwork; Feb 2, 2005 at 09:48 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2005 | 09:55 AM
  #53  
Daniel_G's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
From: Whittier
Originally Posted by gspotter
Before I realized you're talking about an '04 GT instead of the '05, I was going to ask how much he paid for the '05. I hear some dealers are tacking on a "market adjustment" of $3000 - $6000 for the '05 GT
Not just the GT! My cousin took his truck in for an oil change and saw a '05 V6 poontang...oops, I meant mustang, marked up $4000! I can't believe people pay these mark ups. Think about those people who are still finishing up paying their highly marked up PT cruisers now .
 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2005 | 11:59 AM
  #54  
KAHBOOM's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,093
Likes: 0
From: NC
a car length especially 2 at 80MPH is a lot and I don't think that it will be by that much at that point. I do think that in a 1/4 mile, if the other guy is a good driver, the Mustang will be pulling slightly and many different factors will determine by how much and whether or not he will be playing catch up at that point. The issue here is gearing. The TC in the G will give you a big enough torque spike under load that you should have a slight advantage off the line partially because he has less margin for error. 3rd gear- particularly early in 3rd gear is where the AT G will have trouble with the Mustang- evening out as you rev up.
 

Last edited by KAHBOOM; Feb 2, 2005 at 12:07 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2005 | 12:17 PM
  #55  
P_Diddy's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,479
Likes: 3
From: Santa Clara, CA
How much did your brother pay for his 04 Stang? I hope he got at least $5k off sticker, as the depreciation is probably that much already.

It's totally a driver's race and how well you launch. Now if you set up a mapped out road course and timed each other, you'd probably squeak by a little faster because the G handles better.
 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2005 | 12:32 PM
  #56  
Speedster's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 109
Likes: 3
P Diddy --- He got a pretty sweet deal, I think. It was stickered at just about 27K and he ended up getting it for 18K. I'm not a fan of mustangs,(gotta respect the cobra, though) but these days you cant even by a piece of sh*t Hyandai for that price.
 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2005 | 12:51 PM
  #57  
clokwork's Avatar
Cmon Son!
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,328
Likes: 0
From: NoVA
Originally Posted by Daniel_G
Not just the GT! My cousin took his truck in for an oil change and saw a '05 V6 poontang...oops, I meant mustang, marked up $4000! I can't believe people pay these mark ups. Think about those people who are still finishing up paying their highly marked up PT cruisers now .
this made me bust out laughing.....I dont know why poontang sounded so funny reading it. lol...good shtuff.
 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2005 | 07:33 PM
  #58  
ChazM's Avatar
Charter Member Florida G35 Club
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 803
Likes: 1
From: Orlando, Fl
Originally Posted by KAHBOOM
a car length especially 2 at 80MPH is a lot and I don't think that it will be by that much at that point. I do think that in a 1/4 mile, if the other guy is a good driver, the Mustang will be pulling slightly and many different factors will determine by how much and whether or not he will be playing catch up at that point. The issue here is gearing. The TC in the G will give you a big enough torque spike under load that you should have a slight advantage off the line partially because he has less margin for error. 3rd gear- particularly early in 3rd gear is where the AT G will have trouble with the Mustang- evening out as you rev up.
2 carlenghts would probably be around two tenths of a second around 100mph....where do you get 80mph, if these cars trapped 80mph we would be talking 16 second cars here....

ClokWork- how is that funny, what do you think a 04 GT 5spd will run? what do you think a 03 G35 5AT will run?

Try and find the best 5AT for a G35 slip and I will find a GT 5spd slip and I bet I could find one that is about 3-5 tenths faster than the 5At G....
 
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2005 | 01:16 PM
  #59  
KAHBOOM's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,093
Likes: 0
From: NC
Originally Posted by ChazM
maybe a car length or 2 by 80mph.
ChazM, I was piggybacking off of your own thread... WTF? No one is stupid enough to think that these cars trap at 80.

As far as the best time slip for a 5AT G vs the best for a GT Mustang- I agree but from what I've seen it goes likewise for a 6MT
 

Last edited by KAHBOOM; Feb 3, 2005 at 01:19 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2005 | 01:27 PM
  #60  
ChazM's Avatar
Charter Member Florida G35 Club
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 803
Likes: 1
From: Orlando, Fl
There should be a better time slip for a stock 6mt than a 5AT right???? NOw that I think about it, it doesn't seem like many G35's go to the drag strip much at all...
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:39 PM.