RWHP of an AUTO STOCK G35?
Actually we had a small dyno meet this past Saturday. SI_G35coupe has an 04' auto, and while it's not really stock (headers, cats, y-pipe, Z-tube, JWT PC), surprisingly his numbers weren't that high. His numbers were pretty much as mine and Deisel1's around ~227hp and ~225 torque IIANM, and we both have 6MTs.
Here are my results (04' 6MT, with only Z-tube/JWT PC/Grounding gear):
Here are my results (04' 6MT, with only Z-tube/JWT PC/Grounding gear):
i see.. i was proving the fact to my friend that base hp means nothing..
since u had mods and it only gave 225~ rwhp.. i will assume around 220 RWHP with the base of 280...
while BMW E46 M3's have 333 base and 285~RWHP...
at first i thought the more base hp the wider the difference between BHP - WheelHP ... but since the difference of a G35 bhp to whp is 60~.. and m3's bhp to whp is only 50~ i dont see whats the point of the BHP system.. my theory was wrong.. and i no longer understand why -_-
since u had mods and it only gave 225~ rwhp.. i will assume around 220 RWHP with the base of 280...
while BMW E46 M3's have 333 base and 285~RWHP...
at first i thought the more base hp the wider the difference between BHP - WheelHP ... but since the difference of a G35 bhp to whp is 60~.. and m3's bhp to whp is only 50~ i dont see whats the point of the BHP system.. my theory was wrong.. and i no longer understand why -_-
Well BHP measures the actual output of the engine... rwhp simply measures the power that is being put to the ground. Changing different things like the driveshaft would, in theory, affect your rwhp (assuming you were changing the drivetrain's power loss), even though you arent actually getting more power from the engine
Originally Posted by Alonjar
Well BHP measures the actual output of the engine... rwhp simply measures the power that is being put to the ground. Changing different things like the driveshaft would, in theory, affect your rwhp (assuming you were changing the drivetrain's power loss), even though you arent actually getting more power from the engine
u G35s have lotta power loss... my accord coupe has 217 whp, from 240hp
but G35s still faster cuz got more torque :P
but G35s still faster cuz got more torque :P
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by SlayerGTR
u G35s have lotta power loss... my accord coupe has 217 whp, from 240hp
but G35s still faster cuz got more torque :P
but G35s still faster cuz got more torque :P
Originally Posted by Speedoholic
Actually we had a small dyno meet this past Saturday. SI_G35coupe has an 04' auto, and while it's not really stock (headers, cats, y-pipe, Z-tube, JWT PC), surprisingly his numbers weren't that high. His numbers were pretty much as mine and Deisel1's around ~227hp and ~225 torque IIANM, and we both have 6MTs.
Here are my results (04' 6MT, with only Z-tube/JWT PC/Grounding gear):
Here are my results (04' 6MT, with only Z-tube/JWT PC/Grounding gear):
SPeed I just noticed you had an 04 and Steve has an 04 as does Dave....I am wondering if the 04's changed slightly?? I dunno??
It's all close enough... a few ponies either way won't make a huge difference.
Last edited by Diesel1; Mar 8, 2005 at 07:44 PM.
interesting.. back then i thought the difference b/w base and wheep hp was 15%... which was for a BMW M3... so i thought it would be the same for the g35.. which would make it 240rwhp.. but instead the g35 has a 25% loss @ crank
Originally Posted by dennisjai
interesting.. back then i thought the difference b/w base and wheep hp was 15%... which was for a BMW M3... so i thought it would be the same for the g35.. which would make it 240rwhp.. but instead the g35 has a 25% loss @ crank
Originally Posted by SlayerGTR
u G35s have lotta power loss... my accord coupe has 217 whp, from 240hp
but G35s still faster cuz got more torque :P
but G35s still faster cuz got more torque :P
common wisdom says an AT w/RWD has ~20% loss (no matter the manufacurer) and a MT RWD has ~15% loss.
A Front wheel transverse setup (like the Honda) would be about 5% less (so ~10% on the manual, and 15% on the auto)
The numbers seen as posted from Dyno goers suppert this...
i.e. a G35 AT with 280HP has a loss of 20% or 56HP, or about 225 RWP which is what was seen on the dyno.
A Front wheel transverse setup (like the Honda) would be about 5% less (so ~10% on the manual, and 15% on the auto)
The numbers seen as posted from Dyno goers suppert this...
i.e. a G35 AT with 280HP has a loss of 20% or 56HP, or about 225 RWP which is what was seen on the dyno.


