What sounds better? Z-tube or Injen CAI
#2
#5
#7
Registered User
iTrader: (68)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Arcadia, CA
Posts: 2,445
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Trending Topics
#8
![Talking](https://g35driver.com/forums/images/icons/icon10.gif)
Originally Posted by GReddySetGO
Injen has a beautiful roar, but pretty much only at WOT and after 3500-4000 RPM.
It's a beautiful thing to have other people turn around as you approach them and just let them know w/ ur exhaust ....to "move..beaaatches...G is coming thru"
#9
You know I'm down for a good sounding exhaust but for those of you who don't know the G stock gets loauder as you put more miles on it. My G exhaust if far more louder now that I'm at 18k mile than it was at 7k and 10k. I say this because some off you are going to get tired of it some will not. I'm happy with the stock exhaust note.
#10
IMO... I've been in cars with both setups, and I don't think you're asking the right question.
Injen is louder than the z-tube... BUT
The z-tube and PopCharger is as loud as the Injen. The z-tube and P/C is also cheaper, easier to install, easier to clean, less prone to hydrolock, etc...
The noise really becomes more noticible once you remove ALL of the stock resonators in the intake and add in the x-factor of the cone air filter element. W/O the Popcharger, the Injen definitely sounds much meaner/louder than just the z-tube by itself.
Injen is louder than the z-tube... BUT
The z-tube and PopCharger is as loud as the Injen. The z-tube and P/C is also cheaper, easier to install, easier to clean, less prone to hydrolock, etc...
The noise really becomes more noticible once you remove ALL of the stock resonators in the intake and add in the x-factor of the cone air filter element. W/O the Popcharger, the Injen definitely sounds much meaner/louder than just the z-tube by itself.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post