G35 Coupe V35 2003 - 07 Discussion about the 1st Generation V35 G35 Coupe

e36 m3

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #1  
Old 05-16-2005, 08:10 PM
itz_christopher's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
e36 m3

Are they faster than the g35 stock for stock? \=
 
  #2  
Old 05-16-2005, 08:29 PM
spendgy's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It would be close. Probably come down to driver. I've driven my buddy's numerous times and the acceleration times feel similiar although his has an intake and exhaust.
 
  #3  
Old 05-16-2005, 08:45 PM
itz_christopher's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thanks for the tell.
 
  #4  
Old 05-16-2005, 09:14 PM
fast95m3's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
depends on the driver. i own both, and stock for stock, the driver makes all the difference. mine is modified, so mine feels faster, although i haven't run the G hard yet since i'm still in the break-in period.

Why would you race such a beautiful car and risk damaging it or worse? I'd rather cruise around slowly and show off my car
 
  #5  
Old 05-16-2005, 10:16 PM
raleighredG's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Id call it a driver's race as well. I used to own a 1999 Dakar Yellow M3, and Im still not sure which car is faster. I wish I had never sold that car though...
 
  #6  
Old 05-17-2005, 12:16 AM
itz_christopher's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i see, just curious about this becasue my friends own some m3
 
  #7  
Old 05-17-2005, 12:18 AM
meeno's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by raleighredG
Id call it a driver's race as well. I used to own a 1999 Dakar Yellow M3, and Im still not sure which car is faster. I wish I had never sold that car though...
Wow that is a beautiful car. I would take that over the G any day, assuming I bought it new and took care of it my way.
 
  #8  
Old 05-17-2005, 02:49 AM
manh3's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 202
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
i owned a 97 4door cosmo m3, it treated me so well during college. Sadly when i brought the G home and parked them side by side and drove them back to back. The G and the m3 are very similar, performance wise but the g made the m3 look like @#%$. The G is so damn sexy. On the other hand the M3 evoked more confidence in the twisties than the G.
 

Last edited by manh3; 05-17-2005 at 03:36 AM.
  #9  
Old 05-17-2005, 07:00 AM
neffster's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 8,269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NO! A stock (1996 or later) E36 M3 will dyno ~210rwhp and ~210rwtp and a stock 2005 G35 will dyno ~ 233rwhp and ~229 rwtq.

Both drivers being equal the G will win EVERY TIME!!! BTW, just about 10 days ago I dynoed a 1997 E36 M3 with 3 dinan mods and he was about 30 rwhp and 25 rwtq lower than me on the same dyno on the same day.
 
  #10  
Old 05-17-2005, 08:23 AM
dentalstud's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Uh, correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't an E36 weigh about 300 pounds less than our G's? That will more than negate a 20 hp difference. They are almost identical in terms of straight-line performance.


Originally Posted by neffster
NO! A stock (1996 or later) E36 M3 will dyno ~210rwhp and ~210rwtp and a stock 2005 G35 will dyno ~ 233rwhp and ~229 rwtq.

Both drivers being equal the G will win EVERY TIME!!! BTW, just about 10 days ago I dynoed a 1997 E36 M3 with 3 dinan mods and he was about 30 rwhp and 25 rwtq lower than me on the same dyno on the same day.
 
  #11  
Old 05-17-2005, 10:13 AM
Deang35c6's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yup, I think they weigh around 3100-3200 lbs
 
  #12  
Old 05-17-2005, 10:29 AM
neffster's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 8,269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dentalstud
Uh, correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't an E36 weigh about 300 pounds less than our G's? That will more than negate a 20 hp difference. They are almost identical in terms of straight-line performance.
Good point. I guess it would be closer than I initially stated, but I'd still put money on my G (with me driving) than in a circa '96 E36 M3 (with me driving).
 
  #13  
Old 05-17-2005, 10:39 AM
itz_christopher's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hrm, i just learn new info more and more.
 
  #14  
Old 05-17-2005, 03:07 PM
fast95m3's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
curb weight on a 95 m3 is 3180, so 332 pounds less. i'd take 300 pound difference vs 20-30 hp difference any day. i own both, and the m3 feels faster and i've tracked mine under 14 secs a few times in the past.

Car and driver 1995 clocked the 95 M3 as follows:

0-60 5.3 sec (BMW claims 6.1)
1/4 14.3 sec (BMW claims 14.8)
Top speed limited 137 MPH - it'll top out around 150 if you remove the top speed limiter.

That's all subjective, but it'll give you an idea where you fare.
 
  #15  
Old 05-17-2005, 04:24 PM
P_Diddy's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 2,479
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
What's up with all this M3 talk in the last week? How can I beat an M3 w/o FI, etc....

just get an M3 already.
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: e36 m3



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:40 PM.