Cluch didn't engage?? is this bad?
GeeWillikers, it is douchbag$ like yourself that unfortunately the educated/suffisticated people on this forum have to deal with.
Why don't you do us all a favor and sell your G35 so that we do not have to deal with your Bull$hit on this forum. Go flex your little guns elsewhere and please, go buy a Honda Civic. I am sure that you would fit in just perfectly over on their forums.
Why don't you do us all a favor and sell your G35 so that we do not have to deal with your Bull$hit on this forum. Go flex your little guns elsewhere and please, go buy a Honda Civic. I am sure that you would fit in just perfectly over on their forums.
I hope you can get a lot more miles out of your clutch. I ran across this article about clutches and thought it might be of interest. Especially since it describes how to evaluate the condition of a clutch outside of a service bay.
http://www.babcox.com/editorial/ic/ic100237.htm
PS I once jumped over a tennis court net in college to impress a girl. You guessed it, I broke my wrist. We've all made mistakes.
Good luck,
Cale
http://www.babcox.com/editorial/ic/ic100237.htm
PS I once jumped over a tennis court net in college to impress a girl. You guessed it, I broke my wrist. We've all made mistakes.
Good luck,
Cale
Guest
Posts: n/a
Geewill, unless you know what you're talking about, why not keep the inflammatory jabs to yourself and stick to commenting on that with which you’re familiar?
There IS an issue, at least with the 05 6MT’s, regarding launching the car at high RPM’s. Numerous people have commented on it on this board, and I can attest to the reproducibility of the issue. Just rev the car to somewhere over, say, 3.5k, and try to launch. You don’t even have to drop it, just try to launch. Yes, we are all aware of the proper RPM ranges to get the perfect launch, but if an owner wants to burn a few hundred miles off of his tires, who are you to call him an idiot for doing it? He’s buying, let him play. There is no (legitimate, justifiable) reason that the clutch should exhibit this behavior.
There IS an issue, at least with the 05 6MT’s, regarding launching the car at high RPM’s. Numerous people have commented on it on this board, and I can attest to the reproducibility of the issue. Just rev the car to somewhere over, say, 3.5k, and try to launch. You don’t even have to drop it, just try to launch. Yes, we are all aware of the proper RPM ranges to get the perfect launch, but if an owner wants to burn a few hundred miles off of his tires, who are you to call him an idiot for doing it? He’s buying, let him play. There is no (legitimate, justifiable) reason that the clutch should exhibit this behavior.
Originally Posted by GeeWillikers
You weren't driving it like a sports car, you were driving it like an idiot.
You missed second and took a few years of wear off your clutch. LMAO. What did you expect? I bet whoever you were showing off for was, like, the most impressed everrrrrrr!
Keep it up. Eventually your clutch won't work at all and the rest of us will be safe from your idiocy.
And tell them what? That you were driving like a dolt a smoked your clutch? I'd love to be there to hear this one. "Sir, please try to drive the car normally and see if the problem persists...."
You missed second and took a few years of wear off your clutch. LMAO. What did you expect? I bet whoever you were showing off for was, like, the most impressed everrrrrrr!
Keep it up. Eventually your clutch won't work at all and the rest of us will be safe from your idiocy.
And tell them what? That you were driving like a dolt a smoked your clutch? I'd love to be there to hear this one. "Sir, please try to drive the car normally and see if the problem persists...."
Originally Posted by AdamsInfiniti
Geewill, unless you know what you're talking about, why not keep the inflammatory jabs to yourself and stick to commenting on that with which you’re familiar?
There IS an issue, at least with the 05 6MT’s, regarding launching the car at high RPM’s. Numerous people have commented on it on this board, and I can attest to the reproducibility of the issue. Just rev the car to somewhere over, say, 3.5k, and try to launch. You don’t even have to drop it, just try to launch. Yes, we are all aware of the proper RPM ranges to get the perfect launch, but if an owner wants to burn a few hundred miles off of his tires, who are you to call him an idiot for doing it? He’s buying, let him play. There is no (legitimate, justifiable) reason that the clutch should exhibit this behavior.
There IS an issue, at least with the 05 6MT’s, regarding launching the car at high RPM’s. Numerous people have commented on it on this board, and I can attest to the reproducibility of the issue. Just rev the car to somewhere over, say, 3.5k, and try to launch. You don’t even have to drop it, just try to launch. Yes, we are all aware of the proper RPM ranges to get the perfect launch, but if an owner wants to burn a few hundred miles off of his tires, who are you to call him an idiot for doing it? He’s buying, let him play. There is no (legitimate, justifiable) reason that the clutch should exhibit this behavior.
2 - I've been driving manuals since about 1973 (+/-), so let's not talk about who is familiar with what. We'll let that dog lie, okay?
3 - All the little fanboys pulling this kinda crap in the street gives the G a personality with law enforcement. Go count all the threads here where guys claim to be 'unjustifiably singled out' by cops for tickets or attention... Now why do you think that is? Possibly because of dolts that want to play speed racer on the interstate, street race, or 'show off' spinning u-turns in the street perhaps? Naww, BS. The cops 'just don't like us.' Yeah, right..
As a G driver, this adolescent crap reflects on me, it reflects on my insurance rates, and therefore it IS my business. I'll call a spade a spade in a minute when that's the case. This guy was behaving like a juvenile. His antics don't belong on a public street. Explain to me why they do, and I'll recant.
4 - Granted - you're right. It's his G and he can drive it however he sees fit. He can spin all the u-turns his smokey clutch can handle as long as he stays off the public right-of-way. When he comes onto streets paved with tax dollars he needs to follow the law. If he chooses not to and posts his scoff-law behavior in a public forum he should expect to see opinions contrary to his own - as should you. I call it like I see it. If you support this kind of idiocy, add yourself into the group with him.
5 - You want to rev your clutch to 3500 and 'launch?' Be my guest. When your car doesn't perform properly, my original statement holds true, I'd love to be a fly on the wall when you try to explain it to the service department. Of course you aren't going to be truthful - you'll likely make up some BS story to cover your foolishness so service doesn't kick your 'non-warranty-covered-foolishness' out of the bay.
(maintenance guy) 'So, you say you were spinning U-Turns and you couldn't engage second gear huh?
(boy racer) 'Eggs-actly dood, I wanted to nail second and continue my smokey burnout all the way down the street. My homeboys were watching and it would have been the coolest thing everrrrrrr.'
(maintenance guy) 'And you want me to fix your fried clutch under warranty? I don't think so. Now please get the FOCK out of here, I have real work to do.'
Priceless.
I looked in my manual last night and couldn't find factory approved 'launching procedures,' any procedure that involves engaging the clutch at 3500 RPM, or anything close. Could you please direct me to the page and paragraph that tells you the 6MT was designed to be operated in this fashion? No? Then do it all you want, just don't try to call it a defect when it doesn't work the way you want it to. Maybe the problem is the driver's (lack of) skill and not the car. (no, that couldn't be it..) Or maybe, just maybe, the G35 isn't a RACE CAR.. (no, say it ain't so)..
6 - Crap like this gives everyday G drivers a bad name. I'm one of 'em. You want to stand up and support idiocy that could be the difference between a ticket or no ticket for YOU the next time, be my guest. I like to establish my own reputation, not have it pre-determined for me by immature antics from boy-racer and his 'crew.' You're one of the 'sidelines' kinda guys that would rather be 'cool' than do the right thing. That's your choice. I outgrew this silliness about 25 years ago so pardon me if I don't support your perspective.
Keep those cards and letters coming.
Last edited by GeeWillikers; Jun 1, 2005 at 11:51 AM.
Originally Posted by perfectmax
GeeWillikers, it is douchbag$ like yourself that unfortunately the educated/suffisticated people on this forum have to deal with.
Why don't you do us all a favor and sell your G35 so that we do not have to deal with your Bull$hit on this forum. Go flex your little guns elsewhere and please, go buy a Honda Civic. I am sure that you would fit in just perfectly over on their forums.
Why don't you do us all a favor and sell your G35 so that we do not have to deal with your Bull$hit on this forum. Go flex your little guns elsewhere and please, go buy a Honda Civic. I am sure that you would fit in just perfectly over on their forums.
You have your opinion and I have mine. Unfortunately for you, the law supports my position and makes revenue opposing yours. Keep feeding the machine - maybe my property taxes will go down.
If my opinion offends you, use the block feature. It's easy to use and doesn't require accuracy in spelling or grammar so it should be right up your alley.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by GeeWillikers
1 - I do know what I'm talking about. The guy talks about spinning u-turns in the street to show off. I'm very familiar with this - it's called improper handling of an automobile, reckless driving, careless driving - name your label. It has no place on a public street.
2 - I've been driving manuals since about 1973 (+/-), so let's not talk about who is familiar with what. We'll let that dog lie, okay?
3 - All the little fanboys pulling this kinda crap in the street gives the G a personality with law enforcement. Go count all the threads here where guys claim to be 'unjustifiably singled out' by cops for tickets or attention... Now why do you think that is? Possibly because of dolts that want to play speed racer on the interstate, street race, or 'show off' spinning u-turns in the street perhaps? Naww, BS. The cops 'just don't like us.' Yeah, right..
As a G driver, this adolescent crap reflects on me, it reflects on my insurance rates, and therefore it IS my business. I'll call a spade a spade in a minute when that's the case. This guy was behaving like a juvenile. His antics don't belong on a public street. Explain to me why they do, and I'll recant.
4 - Granted - you're right. It's his G and he can drive it however he sees fit. He can spin all the u-turns his smokey clutch can handle as long as he stays off the public right-of-way. When he comes onto streets paved with tax dollars he needs to follow the law. If he chooses not to and posts his scoff-law behavior in a public forum he should expect to see opinions contrary to his own - as should you. I call it like I see it. If you support this kind of idiocy, add yourself into the group with him.
5 - You want to rev your clutch to 3500 and 'launch?' Be my guest. When your car doesn't perform properly, my original statement holds true, I'd love to be a fly on the wall when you try to explain it to the service department. Of course you aren't going to be truthful - you'll likely make up some BS story to cover your foolishness so service doesn't kick your 'non-warranty-covered-foolishness' out of the bay.
(maintenance guy) 'So, you say you were spinning U-Turns and you couldn't engage second gear huh?
(boy racer) 'Eggs-actly dood, I wanted to nail second and continue my smokey burnout all the way down the street. My homeboys were watching and it would have been the coolest thing everrrrrrr.'
(maintenance guy) 'And you want me to fix your fried clutch under warranty? I don't think so. Now please get the FOCK out of here, I have real work to do.'
Priceless.
I looked in my manual last night and couldn't find factory approved 'launching procedures,' any procedure that involves engaging the clutch at 3500 RPM, or anything close. Could you please direct me to the page and paragraph that tells you the 6MT was designed to be operated in this fashion? No? Then do it all you want, just don't try to call it a defect when it doesn't work the way you want it to. Maybe the problem is the driver's (lack of) skill and not the car. (no, that couldn't be it..) Or maybe, just maybe, the G35 isn't a RACE CAR.. (no, say it ain't so)..
6 - Crap like this gives everyday G drivers a bad name. I'm one of 'em. You want to stand up and support idiocy that could be the difference between a ticket or no ticket for YOU the next time, be my guest. I like to establish my own reputation, not have it pre-determined for me by immature antics from boy-racer and his 'crew.' You're one of the 'sidelines' kinda guys that would rather be 'cool' than do the right thing. That's your choice. I outgrew this silliness about 25 years ago so pardon me if I don't support your perspective.
Keep those cards and letters coming.

2 - I've been driving manuals since about 1973 (+/-), so let's not talk about who is familiar with what. We'll let that dog lie, okay?
3 - All the little fanboys pulling this kinda crap in the street gives the G a personality with law enforcement. Go count all the threads here where guys claim to be 'unjustifiably singled out' by cops for tickets or attention... Now why do you think that is? Possibly because of dolts that want to play speed racer on the interstate, street race, or 'show off' spinning u-turns in the street perhaps? Naww, BS. The cops 'just don't like us.' Yeah, right..
As a G driver, this adolescent crap reflects on me, it reflects on my insurance rates, and therefore it IS my business. I'll call a spade a spade in a minute when that's the case. This guy was behaving like a juvenile. His antics don't belong on a public street. Explain to me why they do, and I'll recant.
4 - Granted - you're right. It's his G and he can drive it however he sees fit. He can spin all the u-turns his smokey clutch can handle as long as he stays off the public right-of-way. When he comes onto streets paved with tax dollars he needs to follow the law. If he chooses not to and posts his scoff-law behavior in a public forum he should expect to see opinions contrary to his own - as should you. I call it like I see it. If you support this kind of idiocy, add yourself into the group with him.
5 - You want to rev your clutch to 3500 and 'launch?' Be my guest. When your car doesn't perform properly, my original statement holds true, I'd love to be a fly on the wall when you try to explain it to the service department. Of course you aren't going to be truthful - you'll likely make up some BS story to cover your foolishness so service doesn't kick your 'non-warranty-covered-foolishness' out of the bay.
(maintenance guy) 'So, you say you were spinning U-Turns and you couldn't engage second gear huh?
(boy racer) 'Eggs-actly dood, I wanted to nail second and continue my smokey burnout all the way down the street. My homeboys were watching and it would have been the coolest thing everrrrrrr.'
(maintenance guy) 'And you want me to fix your fried clutch under warranty? I don't think so. Now please get the FOCK out of here, I have real work to do.'
Priceless.
I looked in my manual last night and couldn't find factory approved 'launching procedures,' any procedure that involves engaging the clutch at 3500 RPM, or anything close. Could you please direct me to the page and paragraph that tells you the 6MT was designed to be operated in this fashion? No? Then do it all you want, just don't try to call it a defect when it doesn't work the way you want it to. Maybe the problem is the driver's (lack of) skill and not the car. (no, that couldn't be it..) Or maybe, just maybe, the G35 isn't a RACE CAR.. (no, say it ain't so)..
6 - Crap like this gives everyday G drivers a bad name. I'm one of 'em. You want to stand up and support idiocy that could be the difference between a ticket or no ticket for YOU the next time, be my guest. I like to establish my own reputation, not have it pre-determined for me by immature antics from boy-racer and his 'crew.' You're one of the 'sidelines' kinda guys that would rather be 'cool' than do the right thing. That's your choice. I outgrew this silliness about 25 years ago so pardon me if I don't support your perspective.
Keep those cards and letters coming.

1 - I have no argument that spinning your tires for kicks and giggles on a public road is stupid. However, show me where a G35 will perform "properly" in the context of what the driver is attempting to make it do on a NON public street and I'll concede.
2 - I'm happy for your experience, and I am sure I express the feelings of many when I say I sympathize with anyone who had to drive any one of 90% of the vehicles from the 70's and 80's. However, the fact that you claim that the improper operation of a clutch on a manual transmission vehicle is the result of idiocy and not, say, a design flaw, belies--or at least infers--a limited knowledge of the subject matter. If that's not the case, bully for you.
3 - Not the issue; of course it gives us a bad name, but the fact is the clutch is not behaving in the manner in which you'd see in most any other manual transmission vehicle.
4 - Addressed already. We agree here.
5 - You can 'launch' at any RPM you want to. All that means is you're taking the car from a state of being relatively stationary to having relative motion. If you'll show me where I said that 3500+ is the ideal range to launch anything but a crotchrocket, I, like you, will gladly recant. However, I in fact said that IN SPITE OF THE FACT that it is NOT the proper power band in which to launch the car, it doesn't excuse the bizarre behavior of the clutch.
6 - How many different ways do you plan to express the same thought?
Just as a reminder I am in no way endorsing the operation of any motor vehicle in an unsafe or just plain "stupid" fashion on a public street. What I am attempting to get across is that the G35 clutch does indeed operate in a manner that runs counter to the behavior of most other manual transmission vehicles. In most cars, you rev then drop the clutch, you lose lots of rubber, a good bit of the clutch, and are behaving like an idiot. In the G35, you rev then drop the clutch, you sit there burning the clutch until you have the presence of mind to realize that the clutch didn't fully engage, and you are not potentially sitting dead in the middle of the street. Did stupidity put you there? Certainly, it's neither a safe nor reasonable way to operate the vehicle. That doesn't, however, that it shouldn't behave in a predictable way (predictable with respect to other similar vehicles, not other G35's).
You seem to be mistaking my post as an endorsement for the behavior, which it is not. I simply addressed your attitude because ALL that you expressed before was disdain for the poster, and offered nothing to the actual conversation.
You're welcome. I'm a speedy guy - it's one of my wife's biggest complaints.
My post was in response to the manner in which the individual got himself into the position he did. In my world, his behavior deserved disdain, not consideration.
If this had been a 'my clutch doesn't work under normal operation' thread, that's one thing. In that case it would have received a different response. Instead it was a 'I was using my car in a manner for which it wasn't designed' thread, so it got the response it deserved for the reasons I've already stated.
It's like putting an aircraft into a 350 knot dive that is not designed to dive at 350 knots. When the wings depart the fuselage, don't cry about it. Pop the chute, hope for the best, sucks to be you. Not a valid complaint. If the wings fall off while you're sitting on the taxiway then we'd have a different conversation. In this thread, the OP was diving at 350 knots.
The idiocy of his motivator (showing off) negated the credibility of his complaint. You want to try to pry a manhole open with a pocketknife, fine - just don't whine when the blade breaks.
Finally, sometimes silence implies consent. You addressed the 'flaw' without commenting on the behavior. That's fine - until you direct your retort to someone (me in this case) who has commented on the behavior. In that case it appears (at least to me) that by saying nothing you are excusing the behavior if not endorsing it.
Now.
I answered this above.. No time to deal in hypotheticals - but I will say that every mechanical thing has its limitations. If you're telling me that this clutch wanders into la-la land under normal operation I won't dispute it - this manual tranny is all over the map when it comes to performance and if I owned one that displayed HALF of what I read here I'd be concerned. HOWEVER - nowhere does Nissan promise that this car will do (as you say) 'what the driver is attempting to make it do' and I doubt they'll support any claim of faulty clutch operation under the circumstances described in the OP here. THIS ISN'T A RACE CAR and you shouldn't be surprised when it doesn't perform like one.
I'm not exactly sure what you're saying here - 70s and 80s cars weren't so bad.
The first manual I drove was a 196X Dodge pickup with a 3 speed on the column (3 onna tree) - fun stuff. The first car I owned was a 1972 El Camino with a 350/4 barrel. It would spin the rears so hard the entire rear end would hop off the ground. It ate Tiger Paw 70s like breath mints. I'd love to have that car today. But enough nostalgia.
IMO it's hard enough to define a design flaw (and get a MFR to admit to one - see the years of G35 brake complaints as an example) under the best of circumstances, much less during a smoky display of testosterone. In order to define a problem, you start with normal operation. This post didn't describe normal operation. Here, there DRIVER was the flaw and my post to him reflected that opinion. Definitely bully for me WRT how things work.
Not the issue TO YOU. To me there was no other issue here. See my comment about the manhole. Proper tool, proper job, or no whining. Simple.
You're right, you can. Launch away - just don't cry when you car eats it's drivetrain. You break parts, you buy parts - it's easy to live in my world. If I choose to go screwing around then the consequences are (get ready) MY FAULT. You never said it was the ideal range to launch, nor did I make that accusation. You said:
Just rev the car to somewhere over, say, 3.5k, and try to launch.
As if the car was designed to perform ideally under these circumstances. It's my opinion that the car may or may not perform under those conditions, but if it isn't an 'approved procedure' then we're back to the proper tool/proper job scenario. If the clutch came through the floorboard and the tranny fell out on the street Nissan could justifiably stand in the service bay and flip you the bird. That was my point.
My post was in response to the manner in which the individual got himself into the position he did. In my world, his behavior deserved disdain, not consideration.
If this had been a 'my clutch doesn't work under normal operation' thread, that's one thing. In that case it would have received a different response. Instead it was a 'I was using my car in a manner for which it wasn't designed' thread, so it got the response it deserved for the reasons I've already stated.
It's like putting an aircraft into a 350 knot dive that is not designed to dive at 350 knots. When the wings depart the fuselage, don't cry about it. Pop the chute, hope for the best, sucks to be you. Not a valid complaint. If the wings fall off while you're sitting on the taxiway then we'd have a different conversation. In this thread, the OP was diving at 350 knots.
The idiocy of his motivator (showing off) negated the credibility of his complaint. You want to try to pry a manhole open with a pocketknife, fine - just don't whine when the blade breaks.
Finally, sometimes silence implies consent. You addressed the 'flaw' without commenting on the behavior. That's fine - until you direct your retort to someone (me in this case) who has commented on the behavior. In that case it appears (at least to me) that by saying nothing you are excusing the behavior if not endorsing it.
Now.
1 - I have no argument that spinning your tires for kicks and giggles on a public road is stupid. However, show me where a G35 will perform "properly" in the context of what the driver is attempting to make it do on a NON public street and I'll concede
2 - I'm happy for your experience, and I am sure I express the feelings of many when I say I sympathize with anyone who had to drive any one of 90% of the vehicles from the 70's and 80's. However, the fact that you claim that the improper operation of a clutch on a manual transmission vehicle is the result of idiocy and not, say, a design flaw, belies--or at least infers--a limited knowledge of the subject matter. If that's not the case, bully for you.
The first manual I drove was a 196X Dodge pickup with a 3 speed on the column (3 onna tree) - fun stuff. The first car I owned was a 1972 El Camino with a 350/4 barrel. It would spin the rears so hard the entire rear end would hop off the ground. It ate Tiger Paw 70s like breath mints. I'd love to have that car today. But enough nostalgia.IMO it's hard enough to define a design flaw (and get a MFR to admit to one - see the years of G35 brake complaints as an example) under the best of circumstances, much less during a smoky display of testosterone. In order to define a problem, you start with normal operation. This post didn't describe normal operation. Here, there DRIVER was the flaw and my post to him reflected that opinion. Definitely bully for me WRT how things work.
3 - Not the issue; of course it gives us a bad name, but the fact is the clutch is not behaving in the manner in which you'd see in most any other manual transmission vehicle.
5 - You can 'launch' at any RPM you want to. All that means is you're taking the car from a state of being relatively stationary to having relative motion. If you'll show me where I said that 3500+ is the ideal range to launch anything but a crotchrocket, I, like you, will gladly recant. However, I in fact said that IN SPITE OF THE FACT that it is NOT the proper power band in which to launch the car, it doesn't excuse the bizarre behavior of the clutch.
Just rev the car to somewhere over, say, 3.5k, and try to launch.
As if the car was designed to perform ideally under these circumstances. It's my opinion that the car may or may not perform under those conditions, but if it isn't an 'approved procedure' then we're back to the proper tool/proper job scenario. If the clutch came through the floorboard and the tranny fell out on the street Nissan could justifiably stand in the service bay and flip you the bird. That was my point.
Last edited by GeeWillikers; Jun 1, 2005 at 02:05 PM.
Guest
Posts: n/a
I think we're just coming at this from different angles. What I am trying to get across is that, while yes, it is not something the vehicle was DESIGNED to do, its behavior is not consistent with other similar vehicles. Industry "standard" practice is the same argument that is used when combating "well why didn't you do X, it could have saved my life!". It's the attitude that "well, it's how everyone else does it, it's how we've come to expect it," and that is a legitimate response. However, when this particular clutch operation is predictably consistent across most manual transmission vehicles, I believe it is the same right that gives the consumer the ability to, at the very least, let off some steam without getting railed SIMPLY for operating the vehicle in a way in which it wasn't specifically designed for.
QUOTE=AdamsInfiniti]I think we're just coming at this from different angles. ... [/QUOTE]
I hope I can tread gently into this and pose a question.
Does not anyone else find it unusual that virtually all of the persons that post these problems are first of all "relatively inexperienced" (I hope that is gently put.
) in operating a manual transmission and secondly they were trying to "push the (performance) envelope" a little.
Many then seemingly accept both the description of the event and the diagnosis of a clutch problem as gospel.
In this particular thread, if we assume the smell was in fact that of burning rubber, it may simply be that a "relatively inexperienced" driver missed a shift - it has happened or will happen to us all eventually. (I've been driving mostly shift for nearly 50 years and while I feel comfortable so doing, I still occasionally screw up - as difficult, I'm sure, as it is for you to believe that.
)
I would be interested in hearing of any clutch problems from drivers with many years experience on a MT and particularly from those that also tend to drive a little more aggressive than most. The threads about problems when shifting into neutral at 80 mph or at 6000+ RPM or seemingly missing a shift or difficulty in starting out from a complete stop and how that's a clutch "problem" are of little or no interest to at least some of us.
I hope I can tread gently into this and pose a question.
Does not anyone else find it unusual that virtually all of the persons that post these problems are first of all "relatively inexperienced" (I hope that is gently put.
) in operating a manual transmission and secondly they were trying to "push the (performance) envelope" a little. Many then seemingly accept both the description of the event and the diagnosis of a clutch problem as gospel.
In this particular thread, if we assume the smell was in fact that of burning rubber, it may simply be that a "relatively inexperienced" driver missed a shift - it has happened or will happen to us all eventually. (I've been driving mostly shift for nearly 50 years and while I feel comfortable so doing, I still occasionally screw up - as difficult, I'm sure, as it is for you to believe that.
)I would be interested in hearing of any clutch problems from drivers with many years experience on a MT and particularly from those that also tend to drive a little more aggressive than most. The threads about problems when shifting into neutral at 80 mph or at 6000+ RPM or seemingly missing a shift or difficulty in starting out from a complete stop and how that's a clutch "problem" are of little or no interest to at least some of us.
Guest
Posts: n/a
The issue we're dealing with here is a specific "problem" with the clutch/drivetrain setup. If you rev the engine outside of the normal and reasonable range of a launch, the clutch will not fully engage. This exhibits itself in a PHYSICAL RESTRAINT of the clutch pedal from fully coming out. It appears as if it is halfway depressed, which is about how the vehicle behaves. It's not necessary to rev it into this range, and yes, it's stupid. However, other vehicles (at least, those that I've driven) do not exhibit this behavior.
To me it is surprising that the G/Z can't take high rpm launches. A 3500rpm launch really is nothing. If I owned one, I'd surely be launching at least 4000rpms with a bit of clutch slippage at the track. I launched my 96 Maxima at 4000-4500rpms. I had about 80 passes with launches like that, the clutch was OEM, and had 113K miles on it when the car was sold. The clutch never slipped. I have no idea what the problem is with these 6MTs, but these constant problems are much the reason I passed up two 6MTs when looking at G sedans. There are clearly multiple flaws within this tranny that Nissan can't seem to resolve.
As for the F&F stunt and the resulting burning of the clutch at the stake, I'm not scold anyone. BUT what most likely happened is that the tires were a blaze in 1st with the car hardly moving and when he shifted to 2nd at WOT, the tires grabbed traction, but the 3,500lb car was only going about 5mph. Since the weight of a hardly moving car greatly overcomes the rotational inertia of the motor/clutch components, the clutch becomes a weak link and can't grab against the weight of the car. The clutch gives up and slips.
Damage? Hell yeah there's damage. The heat generated when the clutch is slipping like that is extreme. The clutch pad material surely got fried and glazed and the clutch disc probably "blued" from all the heat. The flywheel probably has some nice scoring. You guys say a couple thousand miles might have burned off the clutch. I say more like 10-20K miles. Any OEM clutch should last 80-100K miles with slightly aggressive driving and 100-150K with light driving.
As for the F&F stunt and the resulting burning of the clutch at the stake, I'm not scold anyone. BUT what most likely happened is that the tires were a blaze in 1st with the car hardly moving and when he shifted to 2nd at WOT, the tires grabbed traction, but the 3,500lb car was only going about 5mph. Since the weight of a hardly moving car greatly overcomes the rotational inertia of the motor/clutch components, the clutch becomes a weak link and can't grab against the weight of the car. The clutch gives up and slips.
Damage? Hell yeah there's damage. The heat generated when the clutch is slipping like that is extreme. The clutch pad material surely got fried and glazed and the clutch disc probably "blued" from all the heat. The flywheel probably has some nice scoring. You guys say a couple thousand miles might have burned off the clutch. I say more like 10-20K miles. Any OEM clutch should last 80-100K miles with slightly aggressive driving and 100-150K with light driving.
Guest
Posts: n/a
OR, if you had taken the time to read what I'd previously written, you would see that I am not merely taking what this person says as gospel. I have experienced this issue, as have OTHERS on this board. If you choose to chalk all of our experiences up to youthful indescretion, then have at it.




