G35 Coupe V35 2003 - 07 Discussion about the 1st Generation V35 G35 Coupe

Will there ever be and AWD Coupe?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #16  
Old 10-06-2005 | 02:48 PM
arjunz's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,467
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Tech
Originally Posted by Pearlcoupeg35
Can it get any heavier? LOL

LOL, the G's aren't VERY heavy ..i would say they are okay...could be a little lighter.... but again ... its a LUXURY sports coupe.. not just a sports coupe
 
  #17  
Old 10-06-2005 | 02:49 PM
arjunz's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,467
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Tech
Originally Posted by Jtrain
Then we could run with the damn evo's

Good idea.

we can still run with evo's ... just dont go off the line .. try to go from a 80mph+ roll .. lol ... you might stand a chance
 
  #18  
Old 10-06-2005 | 02:50 PM
GT-Ron's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,183
Likes: 1
From: Texas
I'd really like to see the price gap bridged with a single-turbo, RWD version (the hot G35), in the same manner as the not-so-old GT-S models.

Having had a street-dominating 325-350HP '97 Mitsu. GSX, I can appreciate the advantages of AWD... ...especially in West Texas where it rarely snows.

An AWD option for the coupe would be nice for some of those running big-hitting aftermarket turbo kits, but it would simply add too much weight to an already-portly coupe in a factory version... ...not to mention killing the fun factor in the handling department. The nice system from the GT-R would simply add too much cost as well.
 
  #19  
Old 10-06-2005 | 03:27 PM
sofl_g's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
From: Fort Lauderdale, Fl
Originally Posted by arjunz
I dont know if i like that idea, it will add too much weight to the car.
Yep, the 2 ton coupe here we come.
 
  #20  
Old 10-06-2005 | 03:51 PM
myGspot's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 980
Likes: 6
From: New York City / Long Island
Well AWD would be in the GTR, but then again, they also said its going to be lighter then the current g35. I dont see how that could be unless they gonna make the whole car out of fiberglass.

I would love to see the GTR with AWD set up or something similar to the Honda SH AWD system since thats the best out right now.

As far as the GTR going for 75k.... i'm sorry i just dont see it being that much. If you going to make this m3 contender, then there is no point in making it cost that much. I say it would be 60k +/- (hope i'm right)
 
  #21  
Old 10-06-2005 | 03:55 PM
B GrAzi's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
From: Staten Island NY
i just wish they would do it.. i almost bought a used S4 because i live on a hill. After about a year of almost buying the audi i decided to go with the G.
 
  #22  
Old 10-06-2005 | 03:58 PM
arjunz's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,467
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Tech
Originally Posted by myGspot
Well AWD would be in the GTR, but then again, they also said its going to be lighter then the current g35. I dont see how that could be unless they gonna make the whole car out of fiberglass.

I would love to see the GTR with AWD set up or something similar to the Honda SH AWD system since thats the best out right now.

As far as the GTR going for 75k.... i'm sorry i just dont see it being that much. If you going to make this m3 contender, then there is no point in making it cost that much. I say it would be 60k +/- (hope i'm right)

Who says its going to be lighter than the current G35?
 
  #23  
Old 10-06-2005 | 04:01 PM
myGspot's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 980
Likes: 6
From: New York City / Long Island
Originally Posted by arjunz
Who says its going to be lighter than the current G35?
I'm not a fan of AUDI. I think they made it one of the sexiest looking 4 dr car, and with some body mods it looks UBER HOT.

but...

Their reliability is horible in my opinion. Most of the people i know that had one or have... all hate it. There are soo many problems with it its not even wroth it. My best friend had an A4 2002, he barely had it for 2 yrs and he just got rid of it for a tsx cause his A4 would give him a ton of trouble.
Plus for a 4dr S4 is pretty heavy.
 
  #24  
Old 10-06-2005 | 04:10 PM
vjquan's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
The Good News? It's already here with the '06!

http://infinitihelp.com/Infiniti/Mod...ifications.htm

Drivetrain
G35 Coupe G35 Coupe 6MT
Drive configuration
Front-engine /all-wheel drive

The Bad News? I'm sure it's a cut/paste error from the sedan.
 
  #25  
Old 10-06-2005 | 04:22 PM
arjunz's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,467
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Tech
^ OH NO! ... are u kidding ... they have AWD on the 06's?
 
  #26  
Old 10-06-2005 | 04:25 PM
arjunz's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,467
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Tech
Thats funny.... they say Rear wheel drive/ all wheel drive...... in the specs but on the Overview, they don't mention anything about the AWD. I would think if they had the AWD version available they would really use that to market the new 06's, but they don't... so that could be a mistake on their part. Maybe they confused it with the G35X sedan.
 
  #27  
Old 10-06-2005 | 04:29 PM
GT-Ron's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,183
Likes: 1
From: Texas
Definately another cut-n-paste error on the part of the company that does Infiniti's site updates, etc.

And does anyone know the weight difference between the G35 Sedan and the G35x Sedan? That would give us a good idea of what the weight difference would be, if offered on the current coupe.
 
  #28  
Old 10-06-2005 | 04:34 PM
arjunz's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,467
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Tech
Curb weight

G35: 3,468 lbs
G35x AWD: 3,650 lbs
G35 6MT: 3,512 lbs

Source: www.infiniti.com ( always have to list the source!)
 
  #29  
Old 10-06-2005 | 05:15 PM
1BADV6's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 646
Likes: 1
From: Northern Kentucky
The older Audi A6's have the 2.7 bi turbo setup that is in the S4. Not a bad deal but the turbos become unreliable after 80K miles and most 2000/2001 A6's in the good price range have at least 60K. Then again a reflash of the ECU netted a 40 or 50 HP increase alone .

The key with the 2.7TT is simply to upgrade the turbos to S6 turbos (which sadly run in the range of at least $4K) but the power potential is monstrous in that car. Kinda like a much larger 1.8T (of course with another turbo )
 
  #30  
Old 10-06-2005 | 05:17 PM
1BADV6's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 646
Likes: 1
From: Northern Kentucky
Oh yeah...anyone that says the G isn't heavy is on some type of crack. Luxury coupe or not I can't find where the hell it is hiding all that cellulite...must be wearing some baggy *** pants. It feels as portly as my GTP coupe used to.
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Will there ever be and AWD Coupe?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:22 AM.