G35 Coupe V35 2003 - 07 Discussion about the 1st Generation V35 G35 Coupe

AT Vs Stick. (Again) Who would win in a race?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 09:52 PM
  #31  
Mr_pharmD's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (77)
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,058
Likes: 0
If an AT upgraded his VB and changed his final drive to 3.5, will he be able to keep up with an manual?
 
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 10:00 PM
  #32  
arjunz's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,467
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Tech
any AT can keep up with a MT.. its just a matter of how experienced the MT driver is. A very experienced MT driver would be able to just beat the AT. An average driver would be able to keep up with the AT .. a horrible driver would lose to the AT .. but not by much.
 
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 11:35 PM
  #33  
KAHBOOM's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,093
Likes: 0
From: NC
This topic has been discussed to death. Do a search
 
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2005 | 09:30 AM
  #34  
devenyi's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
I am by no means an amazing driver, but my 04 6mt is considerably quicker than my friends 05 AT.... hope this helps
 
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2005 | 09:36 AM
  #35  
JDM 350GT's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,100
Likes: 0
seriously, why you wanna make a thread like this one if there are 10000 threads? do a search for god's sake.
 
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2005 | 08:57 AM
  #36  
coolsk8er's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by EX-250
I dont know whether to excessivley use this smiley face:
this one:
or this one:

There is no way in hell an automatic transmission (STOCK, no valve body work, no higher stall) could POSSIBLY keep up in shifting with an experience MT driver. The BMW SMGII claims to be faster than "any" manual driver, capable of shifting in .7 of a second. I'm sorry again, but powershifting, I'll bet my house, my car, my girls car and my doggy hauling suv that I can match if not better that.

Actually, I think I found the perfect smiley for that comment.....
If you bet you can shift faster than an SMG2, you ARE going to lose your house, your car, your girls car, and your SUV - because you made a mistake thinkng the SMG2 shifts in 0.7 seconds, while it does it in 0.07 seconds, faster than a Ferrari. Even the Z4 SMG shifts in less than 0.3 seconds.
 
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2005 | 09:15 AM
  #37  
G35MC's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 701
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, NY
Stop arguing guys, we are family no matter if you have AT or MT LOL
 
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2005 | 12:48 PM
  #38  
ISMSOLUTIONS's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,008
Likes: 3
From: SoCal
Simple way to look at it - can't argue

If you're looking at off the lot stock versions of both
1 - On paper - the MT wins - more horsepower, better gears, more efficient
drivetrain.

2 - Driver-based - An AT could beat the MT if the MT messes up a shift, launch, etc. If they both launch perfectly and shift perfectly, the MT should win based on #1 above.

If the two cars are modded
1 - Virtually no way to judge without applying the rules of the above, assuming identical mods.

2 - With 3.5 gears and TC, the AT could win - if the driver knows what their doing - otherwise it will likely be a very even race. Again, if equal skill in driving is applied - perfect situations on both sides - a very even race - within 1 car length.

3 - With 3.9 gears and TC, the AT should take the race. The additional HP in the MT would likely not make up for the AT's 1st two gears advances. Though, the MT could take the lead at the top when the AT shifts into 4th with about 250 feet to go in the 1/4.

Other than the above - I can't see any other way to analyze this - rationally or not. Once you mod the cars - it all goes out the window.

Here's a list of most of my mods - tell me when there can be an even description and analysis...it all comes down to the drivers and the street - bottom line. Well then - money happens to play here pretty well too.

05 Coupe/Auto/Ivory Pearl/PerfPkg-Aero Kit/OEM 19's - Chromed/Stillen CAI/UR UDP/Borla Exhaust/3.92 Gears/Nismo Cams/Performance Heads/Trans Kit and 3600 Stall Converter/Motordyne 1/2" Spacer with ISO Thermal/JDM Clear Corners/K40 Radar Protection/Hyper White's everywhere possible...more
 
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2005 | 01:14 PM
  #39  
EZZ's Avatar
EZZ
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,056
Likes: 2
Its been proven time and time again that the 6mt in the g35 is superior in terms of speed than a 5at (based on professional publications and drag times). No one has hit 13.9xx with a 5at (bone stock). People have hit it with the 6mt. Also if you believe that all 6mts are faster than their auto counterparts, this is an incorrect statement. The Mercedes 7 speed auto (with a torque converter) produces faster 1/4 times than its 6mt counterpart. Supposedly, the auto shifts faster than any human could and the extra gear really helps the acceleration. Of course Mercedes has a leg up on Infiniti in drivetrain development
 
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2005 | 01:34 PM
  #40  
ISMSOLUTIONS's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,008
Likes: 3
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by EZZ
Its been proven time and time again that the 6mt in the g35 is superior in terms of speed than a 5at (based on professional publications and drag times). No one has hit 13.9xx with a 5at (bone stock). People have hit it with the 6mt. Also if you believe that all 6mts are faster than their auto counterparts, this is an incorrect statement. The Mercedes 7 speed auto (with a torque converter) produces faster 1/4 times than its 6mt counterpart. Supposedly, the auto shifts faster than any human could and the extra gear really helps the acceleration. Of course Mercedes has a leg up on Infiniti in drivetrain development
I didn't read every post in this thread, but did anybody actually say "all 6mts are faster than their auto counterparts"?

Also - putting a Mercedes in the comparison lineup is absolutely ridiculous. Apples to apples - or apples to watermelons????
 
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2005 | 02:05 PM
  #41  
EZZ's Avatar
EZZ
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,056
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by ISMSOLUTIONS
I didn't read every post in this thread, but did anybody actually say "all 6mts are faster than their auto counterparts"?

Also - putting a Mercedes in the comparison lineup is absolutely ridiculous. Apples to apples - or apples to watermelons????
This comment:

"There is no way in hell an automatic transmission (STOCK, no valve body work, no higher stall) could POSSIBLY keep up in shifting with an experience MT driver. "

Why is putting merc in the lineup rediculous. The 7 speed auto is available in the C-class (a G35 competitor)
 
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2005 | 07:34 PM
  #42  
ISMSOLUTIONS's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,008
Likes: 3
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by EZZ
This comment:

"There is no way in hell an automatic transmission (STOCK, no valve body work, no higher stall) could POSSIBLY keep up in shifting with an experience MT driver. "

Why is putting merc in the lineup rediculous. The 7 speed auto is available in the C-class (a G35 competitor)
1 - I'm sorry - you 'quoted' above, and am not sure who you quoted - but it wasn't me - and I never and have never disagreed with that statement to begin with.

2 - We're talking about Infiniti not Mercedes...the thread is about a G35 AT vs. MT...who cares what the Mercedes does and doesn't...we didn't buy Mercedes? If we're all trying to be on-topic...then keep doing so.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
VatoVazq
Steering & Suspension
16
Jan 3, 2025 11:08 PM
THMotorsports
Suspension-Vendor
257
Dec 18, 2018 05:43 PM
dcsbh1
Brakes & Suspension
0
Oct 1, 2015 03:15 PM
kevintandmd
G35 Sedan V35 2003-06
2
Sep 3, 2015 06:41 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:37 PM.