is my AWD system disable
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,331
Likes: 62
From: Chicago
is my AWD system disable
my AWD light on my 05 sedan has a slow blink when i got over 40mph and punched it. I'm on 350z track wheels, staggered setup. The wheels came with 235/40/18 and 265/40/18. So i had to choose whichever setup works the best for me. obviously the best choice was to run same profile all around and i will when i buy a NEW set either next season or the one after that. i found 265/40/18 was very close to the 215/55/17 i had stock, obvious choice was to keep that. I ran just rears for 2 weeks no problems. Now i found 225/45/18 was the closest i can run other then running 265 in the front.
I put those wheels on and BOOM the light comes on. So i read up in the service manual page TF-43, it clearly states what i'm doing with diffrent profile tires BUT it doesn't say what the damages will be done, I know most systems run a fail-safe mode where if a fault is detect, it will just disable the system, this is what i'm leaning towards. That way no damages will be done.
Something the peaked my interest tho, on the FSM it showed 0-4mm of clearance i wonder if one could increase that amount with the help of consult.
I put those wheels on and BOOM the light comes on. So i read up in the service manual page TF-43, it clearly states what i'm doing with diffrent profile tires BUT it doesn't say what the damages will be done, I know most systems run a fail-safe mode where if a fault is detect, it will just disable the system, this is what i'm leaning towards. That way no damages will be done.
Something the peaked my interest tho, on the FSM it showed 0-4mm of clearance i wonder if one could increase that amount with the help of consult.
It's not the staggered setup itself that's causing the problem, it's having fronts and rears with different outside diameters that's causing it. There are others on here who've run a similar setup, mostly for summer driving, and they've pulled the fuse on the AWD and haven't had any problems. It appears you won't damage the system, but that doesn't mean the system is going to like it, i.e. the AWD blink.
BTW, 235/45-18 is actually a better fit for your fronts. I know Tire Rack and other sites show the 225/45's as stock for the 18's, but it doesn't match the stock outside diameter.
215/55-17 = 26.3" (stock)
225/45-18 = 25.9" (your future F)
235/40-18 = 25.4" (your current F)
235/45-18 = 26.3" (my recommended F for you)
245/40-18 = 25.8"
245/45-18 = 26.7" (my future F and R)
255/40-18 = 26.1" (will be VERY stretched on an 8" wheel)
265/40-18 = 26.3"-26.6" (your current R, most are 26.3, but Bridgestones are 26.6)
* All diameters are about average for that size, but check the individual tires as they can vary by .1"-.4" with certain manufacturers.
Those fronts are just too small for an AWD. You really should keep both setups within 2-3% of stock for odo/speedo accuracy and VDC performance. You should also keep each setup within 2-3% of each other on the AWD system or it won't like it. Your setup is off on both, fronts are 7% below stock, and 7% different than your rears. The 225/265 F/R setup would meet both these criteria. just barely (F's 3% off on both), but the 235/45 - 265/40 is even better (both match stock).
BTW, 235/45-18 is actually a better fit for your fronts. I know Tire Rack and other sites show the 225/45's as stock for the 18's, but it doesn't match the stock outside diameter.
215/55-17 = 26.3" (stock)
225/45-18 = 25.9" (your future F)
235/40-18 = 25.4" (your current F)
235/45-18 = 26.3" (my recommended F for you)
245/40-18 = 25.8"
245/45-18 = 26.7" (my future F and R)
255/40-18 = 26.1" (will be VERY stretched on an 8" wheel)
265/40-18 = 26.3"-26.6" (your current R, most are 26.3, but Bridgestones are 26.6)
* All diameters are about average for that size, but check the individual tires as they can vary by .1"-.4" with certain manufacturers.
Those fronts are just too small for an AWD. You really should keep both setups within 2-3% of stock for odo/speedo accuracy and VDC performance. You should also keep each setup within 2-3% of each other on the AWD system or it won't like it. Your setup is off on both, fronts are 7% below stock, and 7% different than your rears. The 225/265 F/R setup would meet both these criteria. just barely (F's 3% off on both), but the 235/45 - 265/40 is even better (both match stock).
Last edited by BuckeyeInMI; Apr 6, 2009 at 09:15 AM. Reason: added tires
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,331
Likes: 62
From: Chicago
aw, crap i think i got my tire sizes mixed around. 235/45 was what i wanted to be near matching.
blah....oh well these will most likely be on for 2 summers. Do you think the AWD is disable when it blinking?
I noticed a huge chug when the car downshifted into 2nd, like if you downshift into 2nd without rev-matching feel in a manual. That was something new.
well as much as i like the 265 in the rear i think i'm going to drop down a size or go same all around. according to your list, 235/45/18 all around or maybe i can run something staggered that is slightly smaller then 265, its a little beyond flush...plus tire prices for 265 are a steep.
back on topic, so now that the car and the AWD system knows that i'm running mis-matched tires profiles what does it do exactly? does it shut down the AWD if slip is detected or some type of limp/fail safe mode? Or does it act normally telling me that my tires are wrong. Yea i know AWD isn't a constant on, so in theory not having AWD will make no difference. I barely need it in the summer other then heavy rain anyways..
blah....oh well these will most likely be on for 2 summers. Do you think the AWD is disable when it blinking?
I noticed a huge chug when the car downshifted into 2nd, like if you downshift into 2nd without rev-matching feel in a manual. That was something new.
well as much as i like the 265 in the rear i think i'm going to drop down a size or go same all around. according to your list, 235/45/18 all around or maybe i can run something staggered that is slightly smaller then 265, its a little beyond flush...plus tire prices for 265 are a steep.
back on topic, so now that the car and the AWD system knows that i'm running mis-matched tires profiles what does it do exactly? does it shut down the AWD if slip is detected or some type of limp/fail safe mode? Or does it act normally telling me that my tires are wrong. Yea i know AWD isn't a constant on, so in theory not having AWD will make no difference. I barely need it in the summer other then heavy rain anyways..
well as much as i like the 265 in the rear i think i'm going to drop down a size or go same all around. according to your list, 235/45/18 all around or maybe i can run something staggered that is slightly smaller then 265, its a little beyond flush...plus tire prices for 265 are a steep
The thing to do if you want a staggered setup is make sure the tires are close to matching in diameter, and somewhere between -3% and +3% of stock, which is approximately 25.9" to 26.7". That means looking specifically at the sizes of the tires you want to purchase. Like I said, different manufacturers can have slightly different sizes. And not all 265's are expensive. Here are some matches that will still let you be staggered. All the tires are under $200 each, and most much less than that. If you want a more expensive tire, than you'll have to do this research on your own. It's not difficult. I used Tire Rack and TireDeals4Less.com to get specs/prices.
Staggered matches F|R Make (Diam.)
225/45-18 | 255/40-18 General Exclaim UHP's (26.0"), Toyo Proxes 1TR (25.9"), Bridgestone Potenzas (most models) (26.0"), Continental ExtremeContact (26.0")
235/45-18 | 265/40-18 General Exclaim UHP (26.3")
245/45-18 | 265/40-18 Bridgestone Potenzas (26.6") (some models, double check if you go this route)
245/45-18 | 275/40-18 General Exclaim UHP, Continental ExtremeContact, Hankook Vestus, Kumho (multiple models), all about 26.7"
I don't recommend the 245/275 matches. If your 265's aren't flush, the 275's will be worse (it's the low offset from those Z wheels causing it). But the 225/255 match looks pretty good and will tuck your rears a little more.
Last edited by BuckeyeInMI; Apr 6, 2009 at 12:12 PM.
actually u might hurt the awd system that way. ive had an sti and evo before and they're both awd, both cars required tires (width,diameter,etc) to be close as possible because its needs to run symetrical and nsync together for maximum performance and benifits from the awd system, so maybe thats whats going on with yours.
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,331
Likes: 62
From: Chicago
FSM doesn't state if the system is disabled or not. I'm assuming it is on but i prefer it to be off.
F wheels are 8.0 and rears are 8.5
actually i thought it would be close call since i did attempt to get it near each other. It might of not been the closest attempt i could of made.
F wheels are 8.0 and rears are 8.5
actually i thought it would be close call since i did attempt to get it near each other. It might of not been the closest attempt i could of made.
Trending Topics
Oh, that changes some things. 8.5" wheels aren't wide enough for 265 or 275 series tires, and are the minumum width for 255 series tires. I figured you had 9's or 10's in the rear.
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,331
Likes: 62
From: Chicago
i like the 235/265 combo, but i dont think there is a 255 combo that is as close.
the 265 on 8.5 isn't like crazy. If anything it would just be the SLIGHTEST strech, most sites recommend 255 being the largest but some show 265 as well. but i'm most likely looking to ditch the staggered tires as much as i love the look.
the 265 on 8.5 isn't like crazy. If anything it would just be the SLIGHTEST strech, most sites recommend 255 being the largest but some show 265 as well. but i'm most likely looking to ditch the staggered tires as much as i love the look.
The problem isn't getting the tire on the wheel, it's that it will change the geometry of the tire beyond it's original design. It will put alot of extra strain on the bead and sidewall, and will distort the contact patch. My guess is you'll see wear problems, deflation problems, and a decrease in cornering capability (the tire will "roll over" more in turns). It will wear down the center faster when fully inflated, and you'll get cupping when it's underinflated. It may also negate any warranty the tire has. Anticipate about a 50% drop in tire life.
The 225/45 - 255/40 is a better option. It's not "crazy" to put a 265 on there, but it's a lot closer to "stupid" than it is to "smart". Your money, your car. I've said my piece.
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,331
Likes: 62
From: Chicago
thanks buckeye for the break down on tires. i'll make up my mind next summer on what to run.
I think i'm going to run what i have now, Tires are off but not extremely off. I know the system wont like it and I dont mind the AWD blinking. Like all other members i seriously care if there is damage being DONE. From what i read pulling the Fuse will not completely disable the AWD system. I'm just going to roll like this for the summer and see there are any DEALS come end of summer.
I think i'm going to run what i have now, Tires are off but not extremely off. I know the system wont like it and I dont mind the AWD blinking. Like all other members i seriously care if there is damage being DONE. From what i read pulling the Fuse will not completely disable the AWD system. I'm just going to roll like this for the summer and see there are any DEALS come end of summer.
+1, glad it's not my car.
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,331
Likes: 62
From: Chicago
looking at this thread, these guys posted up their tire sizes and they are WAY more off then what mines are
https://g35driver.com/forums/g35-sed...us-fuse-2.html
i'm looking to pick up a pair for 235/45 now =)
https://g35driver.com/forums/g35-sed...us-fuse-2.html
i'm looking to pick up a pair for 235/45 now =)





