G35 Sedan V35 2003-06 Discussion about the 1st Generation V35 G35 Sedan

03-04 vs. 05-06 brakes interchangeability

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Nov 10, 2009 | 08:35 PM
  #16  
Tangerine's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Mustang5L5
The extra 1" is extra rotor mass. The more mass in a rotor, the better it is in disappating heat and making it more fade resistant and keeping rotor temps down.

The major keys to braking are 1.) Leverage..2.) Clamping force (caliper pad area and pad type and 3.) Mass of rotor.
Not sure what you mean by extra rotor mass, when I hear that I think of added unsprung weight. But the type of material and surface area of a rotor helps dissipate heat.

Leverage? Clamping force is the piston(s) force.
 
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2009 | 09:52 PM
  #17  
Mustang5L5's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 8,818
Likes: 468
From: Taxachusetts
Originally Posted by Tangerine
Not sure what you mean by extra rotor mass, when I hear that I think of added unsprung weight. But the type of material and surface area of a rotor helps dissipate heat.

Leverage? Clamping force is the piston(s) force.


That sort of unsprung weight I will take. Basically the more mass the rotor contains, the more BTU's of energy it can absorb before brake performance begins to suffer. There are trade off-off as you mentioned. Increased performance but sacrifice by adding unsprung weight. It depends on what you want more. These rotors just aren't large and thick enough to justify a x-drilled design. *most* passenger car types are not since they are not designed for repeated max braking. By leverage, i mean increased moment arm...ie distance from axis of rotation. The further away you are, the less force required to stop the rotational moment. And i did mean the clamping force of of the piston in relation to the surface area of the pad as well as pad material...i just worded it poorly.
 
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2009 | 10:51 PM
  #18  
OCG35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (33)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 17,181
Likes: 154
From: OC - So Cal
Originally Posted by vladkalika
I do take it to the track occasionally. This Friday I was at Buttonwillow raceway and found that weakest link is my brakes. Faded really early and plain didn't want to stop after a few laps
this happened to me too with the puny 03-04 Altima brakes.

Yes 05-06 is a good choice - particularly if you are going to track occasionally... it is a good inexpensive option.

You should be able to find a used set eventually... check the Z boards too.
 
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2009 | 10:56 PM
  #19  
OCG35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (33)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 17,181
Likes: 154
From: OC - So Cal
Originally Posted by Tangerine
Not sure what you mean by extra rotor mass, when I hear that I think of added unsprung weight. But the type of material and surface area of a rotor helps dissipate heat.

Leverage? Clamping force is the piston(s) force.
for drag racing the 03-04 are beneficial because they are smaller and lighter and you don't need a lot of braking force...

For road course, the added mass to dissipate heat is a huge benefit to help prevent brake fade - much more important than the rotational mass... the calipers being 2 piston instead of 1 helps with braking force.

So for drag - keep OEM 03-04... for road course switch to 05-06 (or BBK)... for street - it really doesn't matter.
 
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2009 | 11:42 PM
  #20  
6MTKeith's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
From: Calgary Ab.
The Racing Brake oem caliper BBK's are a good alternative too. Not as cheap as the 05- brakes, but bigger rotors too.

http://www.racingbrake.com/G35_non_B...0-141-0-01.htm
 
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2009 | 12:36 AM
  #21  
Jeff92se's Avatar
Red Card Crew
iTrader: (24)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 37,810
Likes: 585
From: ɐʍ 'ǝlʇʇɐǝs
Premier Member

Originally Posted by Tangerine
Not sure what you mean by extra rotor mass, when I hear that I think of added unsprung weight. But the type of material and surface area of a rotor helps dissipate heat.
Yes you are right but the mass greatly adds rotor life and prevents warpage.

Leverage? Clamping force is the piston(s) force.
Yes you are correct that clamping force (as defined by piston area) is PART of the clamping force. Torque arm advantage defined by how far out the caliper is mounted from the center of the rotor is another (and by my experience a greater part of the equation)
 
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2009 | 01:04 AM
  #22  
DaveB's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,573
Likes: 72
From: Kansas City
It should be noted the type of racing one does as well. I auto-x and have had no issues with fad on my 03 sedan.
 
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2009 | 09:46 AM
  #23  
5150DS's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,984
Likes: 162
From: So Cal
Originally Posted by Mustang5L5
He needs to get them from an 05 (non-AWD) or any '06.


The extra 1" is extra rotor mass. The more mass in a rotor, the better it is in disappating heat and making it more fade resistant and keeping rotor temps down.

The major keys to braking are 1.) Leverage..2.) Clamping force (caliper pad area and pad type and 3.) Mass of rotor.

If anything, the 05/06 brakes could benefit from a more aggressive pad, but you run the risk of dusting and noise.
The people who have run different pads, like Axxis and Hawk don't seem to like the cold stopping as well as the stock 05-06 pads. Now, for track purposes, these would probably be better, but for every day I doubt it. I don't mind dust and if I could get a more aggressive pad that has great cold stopping power, I would be on it in a second.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
davizzle
Media Share G35 Coupe V35
23
May 22, 2022 09:26 AM
davizzle
Picture Share
23
Feb 4, 2018 12:41 PM
Gabe83714
G35 Coupe V35 2003 - 07
1
Oct 6, 2015 06:40 AM
alinero718
G35 Sedan V35 2003-06
5
Sep 27, 2015 09:35 PM
doakley92
Interior & Exterior
1
Sep 25, 2015 12:58 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:02 AM.