G35 Sedan V35 2003-06 Discussion about the 1st Generation V35 G35 Sedan

Offset Question....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #1  
Old 08-24-2010 | 05:39 PM
Matzo Ball's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (22)
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,163
Likes: 113
From: St. Louis, MO
Offset Question....

how much less aggressive is a 19x9.5 +30 compared to 19x8.5 +15? Both are on 255/35s. Right now, I am thinking approx 2mm less. Correct? Also, what offset would on a 19x10.5 w/ 255/35s would be equivalent to the 8.5 +15.

Thanks!
 

Last edited by Matzo Ball; 08-24-2010 at 05:46 PM.
  #2  
Old 08-24-2010 | 06:24 PM
The Stimulation's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (69)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,850
Likes: 158
From: Los Angeles
The 9.5 +30 is roughly 3mm less aggressive. It's approximately 6mm for every half inch.

For the 10.5 to be equivalaent to the 8.5 +15 it would have to be a +39 offset.
 
  #3  
Old 08-24-2010 | 09:41 PM
G35xChicago's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (13)
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,390
Likes: 39
From: Chicago
You know there IS other stuff to mod on these cars besides your wheels/spacing

 
  #4  
Old 08-24-2010 | 09:56 PM
G35xChicago's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (13)
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,390
Likes: 39
From: Chicago
Edit: JUst saw your thread on the headlights, nice work!
 
  #5  
Old 08-24-2010 | 10:40 PM
4D05G35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 50
From: WA
Originally Posted by G35xChicago
You know there IS other stuff to mod on these cars besides your wheels/spacing

good to know......


If it helps any I have 9.5" in the rear with +40 and it's flush and in the front I have 8" with same 40mm offset but a 15mm spacer and it sits almost flush...so esentially +25 on 8 in the front.
Figure 1/2" = 12.7mm if your are calculating offset and rim width.
 
  #6  
Old 08-24-2010 | 10:41 PM
Matzo Ball's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (22)
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,163
Likes: 113
From: St. Louis, MO
Thanks Levon!
 
  #7  
Old 08-24-2010 | 11:17 PM
FlyingLumpia's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,284
Likes: 38
From: Washington State
Originally Posted by donpisto
The 9.5 +30 is roughly 3mm less aggressive. It's approximately 6mm for every half inch.

For the 10.5 to be equivalaent to the 8.5 +15 it would have to be a +39 offset.
Not saying your wrong, but isnt a 25mm spacer an 1inch so would 12.5 be a half.

Because when I put my 10mm spacer on my car it make it a +22 but wouldnt it be the same if I was to just get a 19x10 +22 without a spacer?
 
  #8  
Old 08-24-2010 | 11:52 PM
4D05G35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 50
From: WA
Originally Posted by FlyingLumpia
Not saying your wrong, but isnt a 25mm spacer an 1inch so would 12.5 be a half.

Because when I put my 10mm spacer on my car it make it a +22 but wouldnt it be the same if I was to just get a 19x10 +22 without a spacer?
you are right ....closely,,,,,12.7mm equals .5 in..
 
  #9  
Old 08-25-2010 | 03:38 PM
Matzo Ball's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (22)
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,163
Likes: 113
From: St. Louis, MO
Sorry, I actually wanted a offsets for 10s not 10.5s. So since the 10 is 1.5" wider, that would equal 38.1mm. Half of that would be 19.05 (19mm).

Therefore 8.5 +15 would equate to 10 +34?
 
  #10  
Old 08-25-2010 | 03:41 PM
CandlestickPark's Avatar
ill Sedan
Staff Alumni
iTrader: (87)
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 23,261
Likes: 2,687
From: Long Beach, SoCal
Premier Member
^Yes that is correct.

This is the offset calculator tool that I use, it may be of help to you: http://marksink.com/tire_wheel_offset/offset.html
 
  #11  
Old 08-25-2010 | 03:48 PM
Matzo Ball's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (22)
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,163
Likes: 113
From: St. Louis, MO
word. Thx.
 
  #12  
Old 08-25-2010 | 04:19 PM
The Stimulation's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (69)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,850
Likes: 158
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by FlyingLumpia
Not saying your wrong, but isnt a 25mm spacer an 1inch so would 12.5 be a half.

Because when I put my 10mm spacer on my car it make it a +22 but wouldnt it be the same if I was to just get a 19x10 +22 without a spacer?
12.5 would be half an inch, but it's not half an inch when comparing different widths of wheels with equivalent offsets....check out this chart (this is from the Garson website)



Take a look at the standard disk, 19x9.5. For a 135mm lip, you would have a +16 offset. To have the same amount of lip and go to a 10.0 it's 6mm more, thus a 19x10 +22 and for a 19x10.5, the offset is +28.

If you recall, I had a 9.5+3 with a 15mm spacer, making it a 9.5 -12. Now I will have a 10.5 +0 which is about the same and it sits about the same as well (minus the tire sticking out more since it's wider).

You can refer to the offset calculator Marcus posted to confirm that. According to the offset calculator, my 10.5 +0 up front sticks out 1mm which I would say is about right since it doesnt stick out like crazy.
 

Last edited by The Stimulation; 08-25-2010 at 04:24 PM.
  #13  
Old 08-25-2010 | 04:25 PM
Matzo Ball's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (22)
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,163
Likes: 113
From: St. Louis, MO
Seems about right. According to that chart the 8.5 +12 is the same as 10.0 +30. So my +15 would be +33 and for a 9.5 +27
 
  #14  
Old 08-25-2010 | 04:35 PM
The Stimulation's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (69)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,850
Likes: 158
From: Los Angeles
There's a certain way to explain it, I'm just not explaining it as I should, but it's kinda like....ummm....basically when you go with a wider wheel, say a 10.5" over a 9.5" it's not one side that gets extended a whole inch (25 mm), it's the entire wheel, so 1/2" on each side, thus 12.5mm. Now when you add a spacer, you're only adding it on one side of the wheel, so to push it out a full inch, a 12.5mm spacer would be needed. That's why I mentioned 6mm, it's easier to go by equal units (6 and 12) rather than 6.25 and 12.5, that just makes it more confusing.

I hope what I said makes sense.
 
  #15  
Old 08-25-2010 | 10:22 PM
Matzo Ball's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (22)
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,163
Likes: 113
From: St. Louis, MO
it does and that is the logic I have been using.
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Offset Question....



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:08 AM.