The web address doesnt work. Magan gives you the mid pipe in kit. Its 3 in when stk is 2.5in. I will try and find the mid pipes you posted.

 

So what I've gotten so far is, the best way to go is probably get a new mid pipe made, best sound while still keeping the muffler for not too much money.

 

You can go that way.Is it a factory muffler? Copy the factory bends minus resonater. You will get about same sound as factory. I used a magan muffler. It is louder than stk muffler. Not very loud but a deeper tone. A magan oe rs muffler looks exactly like stk muffler just 3 in. It will sound good with factory muffler! When you delete the resonater it will give it better sound.the resonater is like a muffler.

 

I have the factory bends. So l can use the stock hanger mounts. The G has a great sound to start with! My mid pipe is 3 in. I felt the hp gains as soon as l left the exh shop! Magan states a 10hp gain.I belive it my butt dyno tells me that lol.

 

That's the one that I posted in another thread. I was considering it, but went for instant gratification. But there really isn't much to it. If you have a shop make you one it'll be basically the same thing without the resonator.

 

Would you reccomen I spend a little more and get a mid size resonator built into the custom pipe?

 

Do they have inspections in your state? If you have mid pipe made l would delete the resonater. It just a small muffler. Less restrictions on exh without it. Better sound too! I gained some poines with 3in exh!

 

No restrictions, and so it didn't decrease the torque due to lack of backpressure? That one thing I'm afraid of.

 

I wouldn't. It sounds great with no resonator. No drone or rasp at all. I did notice a little heat shield vibration at some rpms after installing a z-tube.

 

The further away from the engine you are the bigger you can go, up to a point. I remember a good write up by a forum sponsor (MD) about it. I'll post it when I find it.

 

I had to do a seperate post because when I added it to the orginal one it was 56 characters over the 10000 character limit. This is from MD.

"""Back pressure (at least on our engine) is NEVER a good thing for NA applications.

It is a widely spread myth that some back pressure is good, but it is 100% FALSE.

There clearly are situations where smaller diameter pipes can outperform larger diameter pipes but this is not because of back pressure. This is because of scavenging. And when tuned properly, scavenging actually reduces back pressure as seen by the engine.

But be careful in the assumption that smaller automatically equals better performance. It is highly dependent on where the smaller diameter pipes are being used.

Small pipes near the engine can be good for scavenging and power, but as the pipes move farther and farther away from the engine the effect of scavenging rapidly diminishes. If scavenging cannot be taken advantage of, then small/restrictive pipes must be completely avoided.

Back pressure can only reduce power. Do not confuse this with scavenging.
Scavenging actually reduces back pressure on a tuned cyclical basis.

With each pulse released during the exhaust stroke of the engine, the pulse travels like a shotgun blast down the exhaust pipes. The high intensity blast creates a shockwave with a large positive pressure at the wave front. This wave front is traveling so fast that even when the piston reaches TDC and all the gas is expelled by the piston, the fast moving slug of exhaust gas doesn't stop and it rarefies the gas and creates a vacuum behind the shockwave.

It is the vacuum behind the shockwave that sucks out any remaining exhaust gas from the cylinder. This vacuum also pulls more fuel/air mixture through the intake valves during the intake/exhaust valve overlap period. And this is how more power is made. This is the scavenging effect. It vacuums exhaust gas out of your engine!

Adding back pressure can only kill off this vacuum that you want.

NOW HERE IS HOW THE MYTH STARTED.
IT WAS A MISINTERPRETATION OF TEST RESULTS.

Sombody a long time ago probably did the same series of dyno tests I did on varying pipe diameters. Like I did, they probably found that smaller diameter pipes can yeild higher HP and TQ. They probably mistook this for back pressure and put it out in the public. Smaller diameter pipes can provide higher performance when used properly. But small diameter pipes are only desirable when they are very close to the engine.

For example:
I did a series of dyno tests on various diameter test pipes ranging from 2.5", 2.25" and 2.0".

Before conducting the tests, my initial guess was that the larger diameter pipes would produce the highest HP with lowest TQ. And the smaller diameter pipes would produce the lowest HP and the highest TQ.

Well... I was 1/2 right...

As expected, the dyno testing showed the 2.5" diameter test pipes made the lowest TQ. And as expected, the dyno testing showed the 2.0" diameter test pipes made the highest TQ.

But here's the kicker. The 2.0" test pipes made 2 more HP than the 2.5" test pipes! ...It left me thinking "COOL. Smaller diameter test pipes make more TQ and more HP. That's a wining combination!"

So sombody a long time ago probably misinterpreted the smaller diameter as adding performance by being more restrictive. But this is not the case. It is because of increased scavenging. Smaller diameter pipes near the engine increase the velocity of the shockwave and thereby increasing the effect of scavenging. It was a misinterpretation of the results.

So I continued down this line of testing at the Y-pipe primaries. Using the 2.0" test pipes, I then tested various Y-pipe primary diameters. 2.0", 2.25" and 2.5".

The expectation was to see similar results... but not quite this time. At least not at the Y-pipe.

The 2.0" Y-pipe primaries did indeed provide the highest TQ, but it brought a good portion of the HP down. 2.25" primaries were better but could still be improved upon. The 2.5" Y-pipe primaries provided the best peak power and the best average power.

So dyno testing proved the best test pipe diameter is 2.0" diameter and the best Y-pipe primary diameter is 2.5".

I then continued further down this line of testing on the mid-pipe and made some more interesting observations. Testing mid-pipe diameters at 2.5", 3.0" and then a fully open Y-pipe.

What I did find was that there was no scavenging effect possible after the Y-pipe. There was nothing to gain from the smaller diameter what so ever. In fact, the only thing that had any effect was simple back pressure.

Using a open Y-pipe as the baseline I found that connecting a 3" single exhaust had no effect on TQ and with only a small 1.5 HP decrease.
The 2.5" midpipe slightly reduced TQ and was ~2.5HP down from than the 3" midpipe.

This series of tests established:
1) There was no scavenging possible after the Y-pipe.
2) A smaller diameter midpipe can only decrease HP&TQ
3) There will be rapidly diminishing returns beyond a 3" midpipe
4) With power to weight ratios taken into consideration a 3" midpipe can be considered optimum. 3" also allows more headroom for medium boost FI applications.

Going from 3" to a 3.5" midpipe may at best provide a 0.5HP increase. So from a weight point of view, going larger than 3.0" would be counter productive for NA applications.

I then conducted another series of tests at the end of the Y-pipe.
1) Attaching a 3" diameter butterfly valve with variable position restriction plate.
2) Attaching a 6" diameter parabolic diffuser to reduces pressure drop below that of a 3" open pipe.

The purpose of the butterfly valve restriction plate was to directly test the effect of raw back pressure on performance. And the results were very clear.

BACK PRESSURE RAPIDLY REDUCES PERFORMANCE.

I dyno tested the valve at various levels of flow restriction. From wide open to almost fully closed as back pressure was increased, performance rapidly decreased.



This set of dyno plots is proof positive that back pressure is the enemy of power and torque.

Let the myth of back pressure be permanently dispelled from the vocabulary of this forum!

After that series of tests I started another set of tests that decreased exhaust pressure beyond that of a simple open ended 3" pipe.
A 6" diameter parabolic diffuser was clamped onto the end of the Y-pipe. This was used to decrease flow resistance below that of a open pipe.

Dyno tests of the diffuser showed an instant 4-6HP increase over that of a open Y-pipe!

This picture below is a picture of a 5" linear diffuser. It doesn't perform quite as good as the 6" parabolic diffuser but the 6" diffuser is completely impractical for fitment and production reasons.
6" is too big for fitment under the Z and the parabolic shape also gives it a curvature that makes the production process MUCH more difficult.

This is the diffuser used on the MD ShockWave single exhaust system. It can also be attached directly to the Y-pipe for drag race applications



So while there are rapidly diminishing returns with going to larger and larger diameter tubing after the Y-pipe, significant gains can still be made by use of diffusers.

The back to back dyno testing shown below was a simple open Y-pipe as the baseline and then with the diffuser attached.



To get an idea of how a diffuser works you need to consider all the kinetic energy being pumped out of the exhaust tail pipe.

For a normal exhaust system that uses 3" tubing conected to a muffler with a normal 3" outlet with a rapid expansion to a 4" or 5" tip, all the exhaust flow energy is wasted by shooting out all that exhaust gas at high velocity into the atmosphere.

If you have ever stood ~20 feet behind a car on the dyno you will see and feel the effects of all that energy being wasted. Standing behind a car on the dyno is like getting blasted by wind on a hot smoggy day.

It takes energy to move all that hot wind with such force. And all that wind is being blasted out of a 3" tube! So what is comming out of the tail pipe is quite intense. And its all just wasted energy.

But if you were to connect a 5" diffuser to a 3" tube the exhaust gas velocity will be slowed down and reduced by a fator of almost 3X.

And pressure drop is determined by rhoV^2/2g. In this case, rho and 2g remain constant and V^2 is the important variable.

Not only a diffuser brings the velocity down by a factor of nearly 3X. The total pressure recovery is determined by the square of the velocity. So the diffuser is recovering kinetic energy by converting Dynamic pressure into Static pressure.

So not only this means your engine doesn't have to waste energy by pumping out the exhaust gas so forcefully, it also makes it easier for a new fuel/air charge to get into the engine by means of scavenging.

Diffusers are commonly used in jet engines and rocket engines. They convert fluid movement into pressure. Or Dynamic pressure into Static pressure and vice/versa.

In the case of a I.C. engine we only want to efficiently convert dynamic pressure into static pressure. The way to do that is with a diffuser. For a diffuser to be efficient, it must be designed with the proper expansion ratio and diffusion angle. Like the cone shown above.

If you were to take a 5" exhaust tip and just bolt it onto a 3" pipe, it won't work. A regular exhaust tip has what is called a sudden expansion. It is unable to efficiently convert the kinetic energy into static pressure. It just dumps it into the atmosphere and wastes the fluid energy. But the diffuser organizes the flow in an orderly manner and gradually slows it down (efficiently) and all that kinetic energy is conserved.

The engine is still pumping out a lot of exhaust gas but a diffuser makes it a lot easier to do."""

 

It would seem like 3" is the ideal exhaust size after the Y pipe.

 

So going from the y pipe, a straight mid pipe would be perfectly fine. And then if I wanted to continue from there, would it be logical to have a straight piped axle back with a resonated exhaust tip (borla intercooled, etc.) And this would not effect the performance at all? As long as the tip didn't have an immediate expansion

 

Im sure megan racing did dyno testing on their system. They copied Infinti but used 3 in. Y pipe back is 3 in. I love how it sounds and runs! It is faster from the start. I had to get use to the gas pedal again! I have had acura and, lexus owners ask about my exh cause they liked the sound! Very little drone! Alot of women like the sound too! You will love the sound and price! Quality is top notch!! I just couldnt see spending $1500 + for an exh system. I listened to the exh compilation Megan Made the sound I was looking for!

 

Is this similar to what you have? Sound wise? I'm looking for no rasp and maybe even something a tiny bit quiter.
Infiniti G35x Megan Racing catback exhaust: http://youtu.be/8HNsHF9AsZ0


Because this is too loud
04 g35 sedan Megan racing exhaust: http://youtu.be/81g6Yz2Apb8