G35 Sedan V35 2003-06 Discussion about the 1st Generation V35 G35 Sedan

Squeezing out the Ponies

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #1  
Old 05-19-2015, 01:51 PM
adeedpb's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Squeezing out the Ponies

Almost done squeezing out ponies… What else can I do that would give me any worthwhile gains, besides going FI?

2005 AT With 5/16 Plenum Spacer, Z-Tube, HKS Cat Back, and a Up-Rev Tune.
 
  #2  
Old 05-19-2015, 02:17 PM
Texasscout's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: South Texas
Posts: 35,605
Received 2,116 Likes on 1,768 Posts
Originally Posted by adeedpb
Almost done squeezing out ponies… What else can I do that would give me any worthwhile gains, besides going FI?

2005 AT With 5/16 Plenum Spacer, Z-Tube, HKS Cat Back, and a Up-Rev Tune.
Short of cams and long tube headers with no cats, that's about it.
 
  #3  
Old 05-19-2015, 02:28 PM
adeedpb's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Yeah I was thinking that was about it. Not going to bother with long tubes and no cats, California doesn't like that and I am not going to take them off and on for each smog.

I think it might be time to trade up to a G37... Definitely going with a coupe this time.

I assume the G37's are similar when it comes to squeezing out ponies?
 
  #4  
Old 05-19-2015, 02:41 PM
bluedevils95's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 19,624
Received 576 Likes on 502 Posts
You can free up HP by getting a light weight pulley and a CF driveshaft or aluminum driveshaft
 
The following users liked this post:
Hotdawwgman (05-20-2015)
  #5  
Old 05-19-2015, 02:57 PM
Texasscout's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: South Texas
Posts: 35,605
Received 2,116 Likes on 1,768 Posts
Yeah, it reduces "rotational mass" and lets your engine rev free. I have the light weight FW and I can deff tell the diff. You have to put up with the chatter at idle, however.
 
  #6  
Old 05-19-2015, 04:20 PM
ScraggleRock's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 6,811
Likes: 0
Received 738 Likes on 627 Posts
The G37 has even less options cuz things like the plenum design were fixed.

Your next step, as has been mentioned, should be rotational mass lightening. Lightweight clutch/flywheel, lightweight crank pulley (some controversy here), lightweight wheels (18s for best weight/gearing), driveshaft, rotors. All those things will help it use your HP much more efficiently. Also, chassis bracing helps put that power straight to the ground.

Also, lightening the car in general helps you feel the HP the way you want it to. Every 100lbs you take off is worth 1/10 of a second in your 1/4 mile. It wouldn't be terribly hard to take 200+ lbs off the car.

Final drive ratio can be changed too and that'll really help you feel a lot more power.
 
  #7  
Old 05-19-2015, 05:27 PM
adeedpb's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Thanks for all the replies and advice...

I think I will leave the sedan where it is at now and go buy a coupe; I would rather spend those mods time and money on a Coupe with a RevUp motor and a MT versus trying to beef up a sedan.

Now I just have to decide if I want to go with a 35 or 37.
 
  #8  
Old 05-19-2015, 09:50 PM
markc's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: north of toronto, ontario
Posts: 230
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
If you look at the lbs. per hp ratio the 37 has got to feel faster.
 
  #9  
Old 05-19-2015, 10:44 PM
ScraggleRock's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 6,811
Likes: 0
Received 738 Likes on 627 Posts
No, because the TQ is the same as the VQ35DE (270ft/lb) and TQ is what you feel at launch. TQ is a MUCH more accurate way of measuring actual power, and HP is a marketing scheme. The HP suggests the 37 would be slightly less anemic at higher speeds, but the 37 is negligibly faster than the 35. Almost immeasurably stock for stock.
 
  #10  
Old 05-19-2015, 11:41 PM
herrschaft's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Coast
Posts: 7,738
Received 770 Likes on 604 Posts
A G37 is noticeably faster than the G35, stock for stock. Power-to-weight ratio is just part of the puzzle. You also need to look at the transmission and final drive gearing, where the power bands of the engines are and how they are tuned........etc. I'm sure Jairen on here would love to share his experience comparing a G37 7AT to his 05 6MT while at the tracks.
 
  #11  
Old 05-20-2015, 12:01 AM
ScraggleRock's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 6,811
Likes: 0
Received 738 Likes on 627 Posts
Whosurbuddy, help me out here.
 
  #12  
Old 05-20-2015, 12:36 AM
bigc's Avatar
Wings Nation

iTrader: (59)
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 7,931
Received 625 Likes on 456 Posts
kudos on deciding to get a coupe! who mods a sedan anyway???
 
The following 2 users liked this post by bigc:
Hotdawwgman (05-20-2015), Urbanengineer (05-20-2015)
  #13  
Old 05-20-2015, 11:58 AM
WhosUrBuddiee's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Neverland
Posts: 14,494
Received 995 Likes on 727 Posts
Originally Posted by adeedpb
Almost done squeezing out ponies… What else can I do that would give me any worthwhile gains, besides going FI?

2005 AT With 5/16 Plenum Spacer, Z-Tube, HKS Cat Back, and a Up-Rev Tune.
Honestly, without FI, you are pretty much done. There are no worthwhile gains past I/E/T, unless you go big money on cams/longtubes. You could get lightweight wheels and it would feel a bit quicker.

If I were you, I would stop throwing money away on any more bolt-on mods and start saving up for FI or a better car.
 
  #14  
Old 05-20-2015, 12:12 PM
maxxcool's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 195
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by ScraggleRock
The G37 has even less options cuz things like the plenum design were fixed.

Your next step, as has been mentioned, should be rotational mass lightening. Lightweight clutch/flywheel, lightweight crank pulley (some controversy here), lightweight wheels (18s for best weight/gearing), driveshaft, rotors. All those things will help it use your HP much more efficiently. Also, chassis bracing helps put that power straight to the ground.

Also, lightening the car in general helps you feel the HP the way you want it to. Every 100lbs you take off is worth 1/10 of a second in your 1/4 mile. It wouldn't be terribly hard to take 200+ lbs off the car.

Final drive ratio can be changed too and that'll really help you feel a lot more power.
the #1 go to in my book. get a better diff. takes huge chunks off the 1/4. but your mileage will suffer.

your on the 3.5 rear end ? 4.0x is the lats thing you should do besides basic weight loss.
 
  #15  
Old 05-20-2015, 12:15 PM
Mustang5L5's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Taxachusetts
Posts: 8,818
Received 468 Likes on 391 Posts
Both the 35 and 37 are pretty much maxed out as it is. Hate to say it but the G35/37 platform is one expensive car to modify in terms of bang for your buck. If you want significant gains, you'll need to look into FI.

With the 3.5L being 8 years old now, i'd look into a G37.
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Squeezing out the Ponies



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:02 AM.