G35 Sedan V35 2003-06 Discussion about the 1st Generation V35 G35 Sedan

Stock vs Lowered...PIX

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jun 7, 2005 | 03:19 PM
  #31  
Gting's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by DaveB
I guess I fail to see how the car still has adequate travel left with a 2.5" drop and this is assuming 75% of the bump stop has been removed. My G with coupe springs (.6" drop) in the front has about 2.1" of upwards travel before contacting the uncut bump stop. Stock travel is about 2.7" or so. A 2.5" drop with will give you about a 1/4" of travel before hitting the stock height bump stop. Bump stops are progressive so hitting the stop mildly won't result is a harsh impact. It's when you get into the last 30% of the stop is when things get harsh and sometime violent. I've read this all before about people saying they still have plenty of travel left even though they've got a huge drop. It's simply impossible unless the strut housings have been shortend. From what I've read, only the GT springs were added and not the 350Z struts which are infact about .5-.7" shorter for more travel.

The other issue with a serious drop like this is that the suspension geometry is way out of spec now and that the struts are well outside their operating range. Snap oversteer when hitting a midcorner bump would be my biggest concern. That could happen unexpectedly and could mean a nasty wreck.

It's your car though and if you're happy, that's what's important. I'm just trying to offer some kind words of caution and warning.
And he has a four door. Wait until he has a few passengers let alone luggage etc... spine vibrating adventures.... Makes no sense to me as a daily driver. I don't like Sedans with big drops... makes them look like ricers/gangstar wannabes... if I was 16 it would be cool. ie. bimmers, benz, the G.
 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2005 | 05:32 PM
  #32  
kenempireex's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,392
Likes: 0
From: Oakland
Originally Posted by GeeWillikers
I like the lowered look but I think yours sits too low, sorry. Suspension travel on your ride has to be non-existent without rubbing...

Your wheel wells look huge to the sides now - instead of a wheel gap on the top, you have it on the sides.

Love the M wheels peeking through on the second shot..

Sorry, but i have to agree with way too low.
 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2005 | 05:52 PM
  #33  
sammyG35's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
From: South Bay
if he's comfortable driving the car then its not too low. the true sedan test is having 4 people in the back seat while crawling over speed bumps.

it does need some new wheels though...
 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2005 | 06:59 PM
  #34  
Gting's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by sammyG35
if he's comfortable driving the car then its not too low. the true sedan test is having 4 people in the back seat while crawling over speed bumps. it does need some new wheels though...
Put 19's on and the ride will get worse let alone bent rims. Looks ok if your a semi professional or less but will ruin the suspension. Can't align plus major camber issues, uneven tire wear, scraping the front end. Bottoming out on bumps. Very rough ride for passengers. Will induce rattles on the car faster than normal, void warranty on any suspension component, the stock struts will die quickly etc....
 

Last edited by Gting; Jun 7, 2005 at 07:02 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2005 | 08:17 PM
  #35  
sammyG35's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
From: South Bay
front and rear camber arms are a must for a drop this low.

does anything think coilovers might perform better in this drop range?
 
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2005 | 12:29 AM
  #36  
Texan1's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,647
Likes: 12
From: South East Texas
Q50 Red Sport 400 RWD
WAY too low!!! Somewhere in between would be better. Need larger wheels--if you don't.
 
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2005 | 10:59 AM
  #37  
lowchen's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
Yeah, I like the look of it lowered but, have to think that your ride is severly affected. Let us know...
 
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2005 | 11:48 AM
  #38  
shodog's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,505
Likes: 1
From: San Jose CA
sheeit does it really take three pages of people saying it's too low for it to be too low?
 
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2005 | 11:53 AM
  #39  
GeeWillikers's Avatar
Walking The Fine Line...
Staff Alumni
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 19,883
Likes: 128
From: The Lounge
Premier Member

Let's shoot for four pages.

Looked again, still too low.

 
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2005 | 12:00 PM
  #40  
G35Alex's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
From: North Phoenix
Well, if your car is too low, I am seriously interested in seeing how low my car will go with the ProHopper set-up. I do believe it will be way too low for this board's liking, but hey, for ten years I've been building my cars for me, not someone else. That's what customizing is all about, different strokes. For those who have been a part of both the mini-trucking scene (before the import scene blew up), and any other car scene (trucks, hotrods, lowrider) will tell you that customizing is all about one's interest in their own vehicle. Most serious customizers don't build cars for someone else's approval.
 
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2005 | 12:03 PM
  #41  
G35Alex's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
From: North Phoenix
Let me guess, too low? Ok, according to who?
 
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2005 | 12:04 PM
  #42  
G35Alex's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
From: North Phoenix
This one too?
 
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2005 | 12:06 PM
  #43  
G35Alex's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
From: North Phoenix
Oh, but with a hit of a switch
 
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2005 | 12:07 PM
  #44  
G35Alex's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
From: North Phoenix
Adjustability is great, and if you haven't had it, don't knock it. I have owned six vehicles with adjustable suspension (be it air or hydraulics), and the ride has been great, with the ability to go from high to low in a second.
 
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2005 | 02:44 PM
  #45  
DaveB's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,573
Likes: 72
From: Kansas City
G35Alex-

We're not going to tell you what you can and can't do to your car, but don't you think it's dangerous and a bit selfish to put others at risk when your car is not properly set up for public streets? Race cars are low and have limited wheel travel, but they're racing on smooth tracks that don't have the following:

1) Frost and pavement heaves
2) Sink spots
3) Potholes
4) Road debris
5) People or animals (deer, dogs, etc)
6) Drivers not involved in a race

You've got to set up a car for the environment it's operated in.

As for air rides/hydraulics, yes they can slam a car and then raise it to the correct level, but aftermarket air rides/hydraulics make a car handle like a WET PORKCHOP and they do not ride good on the many surfaces encoutered on a public street.
 
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:05 AM.