G35 Sedan V35 2003-06 Discussion about the 1st Generation V35 G35 Sedan

Motor Trend tests the 05 280 5AT G sedan...it's not faster

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #31  
Old 07-24-2005 | 11:43 PM
ABQ_G35's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 9,054
Likes: 3
From: Rio Grande Valley, New Mexico
Originally Posted by DaveB
1) Member dynos suggest no extra power

2) Member 1/4 mile times suggest no extra power.

3) The tested times suggest no extra power.


Once a 05 5AT breaks a 14.2 or 98mph, then you can tell me my assumptions are wrong.
I was thinking, why would they advertise 280 and 298 if it wasn't different? There has to be something fishy about those tests. And, search is your friend? Not always here.............. Why do you have to be so condescending anyway?
 
  #32  
Old 07-25-2005 | 01:48 AM
Texan1's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,647
Likes: 12
From: South East Texas
Q50 Red Sport 400 RWD
We can all agree that the 2005 models are not really faster. If they are it is negligible. We know you still prefer your 05's b/c this and that and that is ok. But let us face it we (2003/2004ers) are not as screwed when the 2005s came out as the G20 owners were when the G35 came out. You feel me? There will never be as huge a jump between any future updates as there was b/t 2002 and 2003--whether that is a minor freshening up or a total new model.
Was there a G20driver.com forum--umm, no.
My point--we have nice cars, now go outside and enjoy.
http://autotrader.com/fyc/vdp.jsp?rd...y&cardist=1863

http://www.nctd.com/review-intro.cfm...0&ReviewID=510
 

Last edited by Texan1; 07-25-2005 at 01:59 AM.
  #33  
Old 07-25-2005 | 09:42 AM
dirrtybear's Avatar
raises all-in
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,783
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
Originally Posted by DaveB
1) Member dynos suggest no extra power

2) Member 1/4 mile times suggest no extra power.

3) The tested times suggest no extra power.


Once a 05 5AT breaks a 14.2 or 98mph, then you can tell me my assumptions are wrong.
Dave, I think he was referring to your assumption that the only thing changed on the 05 was the exhaust sound (which btw is not true). Fact is, the 04 6MT has more low-end torque and the 05 6MT has more high-end horsepower. You don't accomplish that by only altering the exhaust note.
 
  #34  
Old 07-25-2005 | 09:47 AM
mpgxsvcd's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by ABQ_G35
Oh, and so you think Motor Trend was biased on this story a couple of years ago?
G35-CTS-300i
Yes actually I do think they were biased then. I think that the 03 G35’s were not better than the last generation 330i’s. That is why I bought an 02 330i in 03 instead of the G35. Now the new 05 G35 is a different story. I just traded my 02 Bimmer for the 05 G35 because I think they have made the improvements that push it past the Bimmer and you just can’t argue with the price. I think the magazines go into these tests with a preconceived notion of who is going to win. When they tested the 03 G35 it was brand new and it was hot. The BMW had been around for at least a year. I think it won because that is what they thought the readers would want to hear. Now with the new BMW’s those are all new so they just expect it to be the best. Hopefully one of the magazines will actually look at the two cars and say there is no way to justify spending 10K extra on the new 330i! Price does matter! The older test was also between automatics. I don’t think the 330i automatic is any good. I love my new 05 Slushbox G35 though! Was the new test done with automatics or manual transmissions? Maybe that is why the times are so slow?
 
  #35  
Old 07-25-2005 | 09:50 AM
DaveO's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,129
Likes: 0
From: Hi Desert, Kalifornia
In Desert Day Dynoing Article - Sport Z Magazine, Summer 2005 - we documented the dynojet performance of two pure stock G35 AT Sedans, an 03.5 and an 05. The 03.5 had 23.6k miles and the 05 had 1,258 miles on their respective clocks. In this particluar case the 05 made more horsepower and torque under the curve.
 
  #36  
Old 07-25-2005 | 09:51 AM
GeeWillikers's Avatar
Walking The Fine Line...
Staff Alumni
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 19,883
Likes: 128
From: The Lounge
Premier Member
Originally Posted by Gting
What size were the rims on the 05 test?
I haven't seen the article, but I assume (and it will likely be the death of me) that because it was 5AT that they had the base 17" wheels like I have on mine..

Dunno 'fer sure.
 
  #37  
Old 07-25-2005 | 09:54 AM
GeeWillikers's Avatar
Walking The Fine Line...
Staff Alumni
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 19,883
Likes: 128
From: The Lounge
Premier Member
Originally Posted by mpgxsvcd
Was the new test done with automatics or manual transmissions? Maybe that is why the times are so slow?
The answer to your question was in the very first post of the thread... Now highlighted for your convenience.

While at the airport today, I saw the new Motor Trend with a comparo test of the 05 G35 sedan 5AT, the 06 BMW 330 5at, and A4. The 05 G went 14.7@95.9mph. The quickest G35 sedan they ever tested went 14.6@97.1mph. That was an 03 model. Remember that MT corrects all their times to standard conditions (sea level, 20% humidity, 29.8 baro).
 
  #38  
Old 07-25-2005 | 09:55 AM
mpgxsvcd's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Texan1
We can all agree that the 2005 models are not really faster. If they are it is negligible. We know you still prefer your 05's b/c this and that and that is ok. But let us face it we (2003/2004ers) are not as screwed when the 2005s came out as the G20 owners were when the G35 came out. You feel me? There will never be as huge a jump between any future updates as there was b/t 2002 and 2003--whether that is a minor freshening up or a total new model.
Was there a G20driver.com forum--umm, no.
My point--we have nice cars, now go outside and enjoy.
http://autotrader.com/fyc/vdp.jsp?rd...y&cardist=1863

http://www.nctd.com/review-intro.cfm...0&ReviewID=510
I agree that the performance improvements are debatable between the 03 and the 05 G35’s. However, there is one thing that kept me from buying the 03. That stupid little box on the trunk! Once they took that away I was interested in the G35 again. And now that they have revised the front and rear designs I could not resist.
 
  #39  
Old 07-25-2005 | 09:57 AM
GeeWillikers's Avatar
Walking The Fine Line...
Staff Alumni
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 19,883
Likes: 128
From: The Lounge
Premier Member
Going by what DaveB said in the first post, we're talking about a test regarding 5ATs.

I think performance gains or lack of performance gains should be referred to those cars and the 6MTs left in another thread.

The question of performance numbers here has nothing to do with 298/260, but rather 260/260 (rated) vs 280/270 (rated).

Does anyone agree with that? (at least?)
 
  #40  
Old 07-25-2005 | 10:11 AM
dallasg's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
I agree with that, and if the '05 5AT really did 0-60 in 5.8 as said above, that is certainly an improvement over the 6.2 recorded in the previous MT test against the BMW and Cadillac.
 
  #41  
Old 07-25-2005 | 10:35 AM
mpgxsvcd's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by GeeWillikers
The answer to your question was in the very first post of the thread... Now highlighted for your convenience.
Sorry the whole title did not show so I wasn’t sure if they had used an automatic 330i or not. I wouldn’t put it past some of the magazines to throw an auto G35 up against a manual 330i to get the prices closer together. I see now that at least motor trend is above this tactic.
 
  #42  
Old 07-25-2005 | 11:04 AM
GeeWillikers's Avatar
Walking The Fine Line...
Staff Alumni
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 19,883
Likes: 128
From: The Lounge
Premier Member
No sweat - just trying to keep things on the level as this topic interests me. There are usually strong feelings when the comparison of the 05 is made to the previous model years.

Pretty soon the 06s will be here and we can all compare ourselves to them - LOL.
 
  #43  
Old 07-25-2005 | 11:09 AM
mpgxsvcd's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by GeeWillikers
No sweat - just trying to keep things on the level as this topic interests me. There are usually strong feelings when the comparison of the 05 is made to the previous model years.

Pretty soon the 06s will be here and we can all compare ourselves to them - LOL.
I just heard that the 06’s will have the rear active steer and Bluetooth. Man I almost wish I had waited now! Although I don’t think you will be able to get an 06 any where near invoice for quite awhile. I would expect the rear active steer to bring the G35 closer to the handling of the 330i. I bet the 06 G35 will spank the 330i in every category and that will be a better comparison since both models will be an 06 then. I think they both will have to watch out for the Lexus IS350. That motor is a monster! 300+ HP!
 
  #44  
Old 07-25-2005 | 11:14 AM
G35_TX's Avatar
Premier Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,671
Likes: 0
From: South
Premier Member
Originally Posted by dirrtybear
Dave, I think he was referring to your assumption that the only thing changed on the 05 was the exhaust sound (which btw is not true). Fact is, the 04 6MT has more low-end torque and the 05 6MT has more high-end horsepower. You don't accomplish that by only altering the exhaust note.
I think he was talking about the 05 AT not the 6mt. The 6mt has internals changed in the engine from pistons, rods, crank, etc.
 
  #45  
Old 07-25-2005 | 11:38 AM
Texan1's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,647
Likes: 12
From: South East Texas
Q50 Red Sport 400 RWD
Originally Posted by mpgxsvcd
I agree that the performance improvements are debatable between the 03 and the 05 G35’s. However, there is one thing that kept me from buying the 03. That stupid little box on the trunk! Once they took that away I was interested in the G35 again. And now that they have revised the front and rear designs I could not resist.

You could have purchased an 03.5--No doggie door trunk.
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Motor Trend tests the 05 280 5AT G sedan...it's not faster



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:52 PM.