G35 Sedan V35 2003-06 Discussion about the 1st Generation V35 G35 Sedan

ideas on why 0-60 times so close W/38 HP difference....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #31  
Old 09-19-2005, 10:41 PM
DaveB's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 6,573
Likes: 0
Received 72 Likes on 51 Posts
Originally Posted by trey.hutcheson
And one more last thing. The first time we all went to the drag strip as a group, my best run ended up being faster than any other g's best runs, at least in ET's. These other g's included Cheryl's sedan, and three other coupes(1 04 5AT with a few mods, 1 04 6MT with a few mods, and an 05 5AT bone stock). Although I would love to believe that's because of innate driver ability, I'm just not that good. So, the extra HP at peak definitely contributed to my better times. But I really think the largest factor was the ability to run to 7k instead of 6600.
What were the trap speeds? That's the true indication HP. ET is more of an indication traction and driver skill. You could run a 14.9@98mph with a 2.6 60 foot or 14.3@98mph with a 2.1 60 foot. The only difference is 60 foot. It's hard to change trap speed unless you miss a shift. If the car's are within .5-1mph, then they're probably making close to the same average power.
 
  #32  
Old 09-20-2005, 12:15 AM
Gting's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TooLoud
I don't have any hard facts, but one thing that comes to mind is that the the 6MT sedan comes standard with a limited-slip diff and 18" wheels, compared to a 5AT's open diff and 17" wheels. I would think both items would cause an increase in the 6MT's listed weight over the 5AT. It would be interesting to know how a 5AT with the sport package compares to a 6MT, all other options being equal. Maybe the differences in the 6MT's higher-power motor (variable exhaust valve timing?) also adds a bit more weight?
Well not taking wheels into account I am sure the 6MT weighs less. And the 18" are not all that much heavier anyways. Not sure where everyone is getting the info that it weighs more? This is the first time I have heard that.
 
  #33  
Old 09-20-2005, 08:28 AM
SixFive's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Philly
Posts: 2,873
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 6MT weighs more than the AT.
 
  #34  
Old 09-20-2005, 10:00 AM
doogie's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Denton, TX
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveB
I'd need to see proof of that.
-1 on that... so I think we're back at 4 now.

 
  #35  
Old 09-20-2005, 10:23 AM
DaveB's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 6,573
Likes: 0
Received 72 Likes on 51 Posts
Originally Posted by Gting
Well not taking wheels into account I am sure the 6MT weighs less. And the 18" are not all that much heavier anyways. Not sure where everyone is getting the info that it weighs more? This is the first time I have heard that.
The JATCO 5AT is very compact and light. The TC is pretty small and it doesn't have the material denisity as the 6MT meaning it simply doesn't have all the moving thick metal parts. The 6MT has 7 main gears plus slider gears, shafts, hydraulic clutch system, 6 quarts of heavy gear oil, a dual mass flywheel, clutch and pressure plate, and thick reinforced case. It all adds up. The 5AT on the other hand is largely bands, lots of small clutches, a few gears, and lots of fluid. On paper and according to Infiniti, the 6MT weighs about 42lbs more than the 5AT. The same thing goes for the T56 in the Vette/F-Body. It weighs about 50lbs more than the 4L60E automatic.
 
  #36  
Old 09-20-2005, 12:23 PM
Gting's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveB
The JATCO 5AT is very compact and light. The TC is pretty small and it doesn't have the material denisity as the 6MT meaning it simply doesn't have all the moving thick metal parts. The 6MT has 7 main gears plus slider gears, shafts, hydraulic clutch system, 6 quarts of heavy gear oil, a dual mass flywheel, clutch and pressure plate, and thick reinforced case. It all adds up. The 5AT on the other hand is largely bands, lots of small clutches, a few gears, and lots of fluid. On paper and according to Infiniti, the 6MT weighs about 42lbs more than the 5AT. The same thing goes for the T56 in the Vette/F-Body. It weighs about 50lbs more than the 4L60E automatic.
I checked infinit.com and there is a difference but that is a 5at without aero.

G35 3,468 lbs (this is non aero with 17)
G35x AWD 3,650 lbs
G35 6MT 3,512 lbs (standard with aero with 18's?)

In Canada the 2005 6mt sedan is standard with aero. Is aero standard on the 6mt in the USA as well?

The 6mt comes with 18's which are a bit heavier and aero kit. The 5at comes with lighter 17's and non aero. So there is no offical proof that the 5at is lighter.

Taken from Infinit Canada:CAPACITIES AND WEIGHTS

Curb weight: 1579 kg (3,482 lb) / Aero Package: 1594 kg (3,516 lb)
http://www.infiniti.ca/en/models/05_...delCode=G4TG75

So I am not sure what proof the 5at is lighter? If you put the 18's and aero kit on a 5at it would be the same weight or even heavier than the 6mt.

IMO:
A well driven 2005 6mt will pull easily a 5at (both with the same rims) on a roll espeically on the highway (after 2nd gear and espeically 4th+). The weight is really not much a factor since it is so close and has yet to be proven. The 7200rpm fuel cut is sweet and the aero .26 drag coefficient shines in the top end! A 2005 6mt with light 17" ssr comps would be a nice set up for top end and help dramatically in the low end.
 

Last edited by Gting; 09-20-2005 at 12:49 PM.
  #37  
Old 09-20-2005, 01:07 PM
Gting's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
After checking out the 350z and G Coupe. It does look like th 5at is a bit lighter. ~40lbs. I am not sure if 40lbs makes any real big difference at these weights. I will take the extra 40lbs to get a 7200 fuel cut and more power under the curve up top. If a 6mt is launched right 3500-4000 with a little clutch feathering hit all the gears near fuel cut it will rock a 5at. And will keep pulling away right up to top speed.




 

Last edited by Gting; 09-20-2005 at 01:20 PM.
  #38  
Old 09-20-2005, 02:15 PM
DaveB's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 6,573
Likes: 0
Received 72 Likes on 51 Posts
Originally Posted by Gting

IMO:
A well driven 2005 6mt will pull easily a 5at (both with the same rims) on a roll espeically on the highway (after 2nd gear and espeically 4th+). The weight is really not much a factor since it is so close and has yet to be proven. The 7200rpm fuel cut is sweet and the aero .26 drag coefficient shines in the top end! A 2005 6mt with light 17" ssr comps would be a nice set up for top end and help dramatically in the low end.
I pretty much agree. From a dead stop, the 6MT should still be able to pull the 5AT by the end of the 1/4 mile, however that really is dependant on the 6MT driver's ability from 0-30mph.

If a 6mt is launched right 3500-4000 with a little clutch feathering hit all the gears near fuel cut it will rock a 5at. And will keep pulling away right up to top speed.
I wouldn't say "rock" because the 5ATs as a whole pull better 60 foots. I've done 2.1s on EL42s. Most 6MTs are pulling mid 2.2s and a rare few have pulled 2.1s. Mount some slicks on the 6MT and the 5AT doesn't have a chance.....assuming the halfshafts can handle the 5000rpm clutch dump launch.
 
  #39  
Old 09-20-2005, 02:19 PM
t0pher's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveB
HP sells cars. Power under curve wins races.
Thank you, Caroll Shelby!
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
chinee
G35 Sedan V35 2003-06
21
06-10-2024 07:48 PM
joedaddy1
Engine, Drivetrain & Forced-Induction
0
07-28-2015 02:58 PM
will091195
General Tech Questions
1
07-27-2015 09:19 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: ideas on why 0-60 times so close W/38 HP difference....



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:13 AM.