Representing 4-Door "G's" - I beat a Mustang!
Originally Posted by DaveB
Yep, they're far from a dog. At my track, in stock form, the 99-04s run 14.0-14.6 depending on driver, conditions, and tranny. A few friends have 01-02 GTs 5MT and they're doing 13.6-13.8@101mph+ with just DRs, X-pipe, and some simple free mods. I don't 6MT G35 coming close to that.
99-04 Mustang GT vs G35, driver's race with the nod going to the GT.
Put me in a 99+ GT and I'll light up any stock or lightly modded NA G35.
99-04 Mustang GT vs G35, driver's race with the nod going to the GT.
Put me in a 99+ GT and I'll light up any stock or lightly modded NA G35.
Congratulations, Jady but don’t think the results will be the same against every ‘99+ GT, even a stock one.
Now for the off-topic stuff.
I still own my second Mustang but it was an easy jump to the G35. The decent power, RWD, IRS, 6MT, very good legroom, non-generic body styling and a nice price made it a no brainer for me.
I agree to some extent. When getting our Saleen, I was expecting that there would be some quality issues, both Saleen and Ford related. It has been relatively trouble free over the almost six years owning it, though. Our G on the other hand, has already had a couple thousand dollars worth of warrantee work done on it, and it needs more work done, still. That has been a big surprise.
O.k., back to the topic.
Now for the off-topic stuff.
Originally Posted by erikill
But it is interesting a lot of people have switched from mustangs to G35 (probably for the sedan) since it is a sport "muscle" car almost and yet has that family car usage (theres that other thread).
Originally Posted by erikill
My friend has a 96 Cobra Mystic, and man that thing is in the shop all the time, and before that a 91 GT, and that was in the shop even more. FORD = Fix or Repair Daily for sure seeing how the mustangs can't even not be in the shop. I think that alone scares me from ever goin american again until the quality control is better.
I agree to some extent. When getting our Saleen, I was expecting that there would be some quality issues, both Saleen and Ford related. It has been relatively trouble free over the almost six years owning it, though. Our G on the other hand, has already had a couple thousand dollars worth of warrantee work done on it, and it needs more work done, still. That has been a big surprise.
O.k., back to the topic.
I love how people automatically assume the Mustang is a POS. I guess they never knew that the 99-04 Mustang has one of the highest long term reliability records on the road. Ergonomically, the sub 04 Stangs were horrible, but reliability wise they aren't bad at all. Hell, I plan to buy an 89-93 5.0 notchback just because the cars are such a blast to drive and hella fast with little work.
Originally Posted by DaveB
I love how people automatically assume the Mustang is a POS...
Fair or not, from that point forward, I've always thought the mustang was a POS.
----
end threadjack
In '92 they only had a 2.3 liter I-4 or the 302 V8.
....and that is the 1st time I've ever heard of a quality control issue like that!!! Granted, I have never been a fan of the Fox-chassis mustang styling (79-93), but I wouldn't base the quality and reliability of those mustangs based on that unusual case.
....and that is the 1st time I've ever heard of a quality control issue like that!!! Granted, I have never been a fan of the Fox-chassis mustang styling (79-93), but I wouldn't base the quality and reliability of those mustangs based on that unusual case.
I find it amusing that in some threads it's cool to post a clear street race, while others you will get slamed to the wall, the burnt to hell from all the flames. What gives? Personally I like to read these stories as long as the drivers are not reckless, just wondering why the double standard.
Originally Posted by QuadCam
In '92 they only had a 2.3 liter I-4 or the 302 V8.
....and that is the 1st time I've ever heard of a quality control issue like that!!! Granted, I have never been a fan of the Fox-chassis mustang styling (79-93), but I wouldn't base the quality and reliability of those mustangs based on that unusual case.
....and that is the 1st time I've ever heard of a quality control issue like that!!! Granted, I have never been a fan of the Fox-chassis mustang styling (79-93), but I wouldn't base the quality and reliability of those mustangs based on that unusual case.
And you're right. It's not fair to base one's opinion on such an incedent, and I understand that now, but at the time it really stuck with me.
Before the G, I had an 04 Cobra (v8 4.6L, four cams, 32 valves, supercharged) putting about 460 RWHP and torque. My buddies put 517 RWHP with a ported stock blower. The 03-04 Cobras are pure animals. 05 + GT's run mid 13's out of the showromm and mid- high 12's NA. Be carefull who you race with. A 99-04 Stock GT is a good race with a G 35 6 MT.
Originally Posted by MrBig
I find it amusing that in some threads it's cool to post a clear street race, while others you will get slamed to the wall, the burnt to hell from all the flames. What gives? Personally I like to read these stories as long as the drivers are not reckless, just wondering why the double standard.
I agree 100%. Yet another winning thread on the G35driver.com Sedan section!
Originally Posted by DP03
What do you mean mid-high 12's NA?
Originally Posted by DaveB
I love how people automatically assume the Mustang is a POS. I guess they never knew that the 99-04 Mustang has one of the highest long term reliability records on the road. Ergonomically, the sub 04 Stangs were horrible, but reliability wise they aren't bad at all. Hell, I plan to buy an 89-93 5.0 notchback just because the cars are such a blast to drive and hella fast with little work.
Originally Posted by MrBig
I find it amusing that in some threads it's cool to post a clear street race, while others you will get slamed to the wall, the burnt to hell from all the flames. What gives? Personally I like to read these stories as long as the drivers are not reckless, just wondering why the double standard.



