G35 Sedan V35 2003-06 Discussion about the 1st Generation V35 G35 Sedan

wheels and tires and performance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #1  
Old 02-26-2006 | 05:41 PM
TheTrance's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton, AB
wheels and tires and performance

would there be any negative performance effects (slower 0-60 times) if i upgrade to 18x8.5F and 18x9.5R wheels with 245/40/18F
275/35/18R tiers? my main aim is to have better 0-60 times and better looks
rims will be around 18lbs each
Please comment! thanks!!!
 

Last edited by TheTrance; 02-26-2006 at 05:44 PM.
  #2  
Old 02-26-2006 | 09:43 PM
Gdup35sedan's Avatar
ENVautoDetailing.com
iTrader: (47)
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 9,257
Likes: 136
From: San Diego/Redondo Beach
Premier Member
No negative performance effects... your talking about going from a wheel that weighs 23+ lbs. to one that weighs 18. Your losing a significant amount of rotational mass which will increase performance and the wider tires out back will grip more. So the answer to your question is NO!
-GP-
 
  #3  
Old 02-27-2006 | 12:19 PM
DaddysG35's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: Seattle (Mill Creek)
Trance-

I agree with the rotational mass not being an issue with the wheels, but the tires are different.
If you want to keep as close to the OD (outside diameter) as possible ,try 245/45/18 and 275/40/18. These are both 26.8 OD (Pilot Sport tires) stock OD is 26.4 or 26.5 depending on the stock tire. The 245/40/18 has an OD of 25.8 which is smaller, but a farther deviation from stock.

If you are planning to possibly have to make modifications to the speedo and VDC and everything else to do with the traction control and ABS then by all means do the smaller size OD if you wish.

Hope this helps!
 
  #4  
Old 02-27-2006 | 12:49 PM
jimmyc13's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,864
Likes: 3
From: Boston, MA
Originally Posted by DaddysG35
Trance-

I agree with the rotational mass not being an issue with the wheels, but the tires are different.
If you want to keep as close to the OD (outside diameter) as possible ,try 245/45/18 and 275/40/18. These are both 26.8 OD (Pilot Sport tires) stock OD is 26.4 or 26.5 depending on the stock tire. The 245/40/18 has an OD of 25.8 which is smaller, but a farther deviation from stock.

If you are planning to possibly have to make modifications to the speedo and VDC and everything else to do with the traction control and ABS then by all means do the smaller size OD if you wish.

Hope this helps!
Trance - you may not want to run what he recommends....as that setup will most likely rub in the rear. It's been confirmed that 275/35/19 tires rub in the rear, with a stock suspension. Follow my math:

275/35/19: 275 x 0.35 = 96.25mm = 3.79 in
3.79 in x 2 = 7.58 in.
7.58 in + 19" rim = 26.58 in (larger OD than stock..plus you're running a much wider tire, so this rubs)

Now he's recommending 275/40/18...following the same math as above, but with an 18 in. rim yields 26.66 in. (or 26.8 as he says above). You may want to ask around before going w/ that setup, unless you want to roll your fenders. Obviously the offset will affect this as well.

DaddysG35 - I'm just trying to prevent him from making a mistake...

Let me know if you want that link where 275/35/19's rub.

Good luck.
 
  #5  
Old 02-27-2006 | 01:33 PM
Jeff92se's Avatar
Red Card Crew
iTrader: (24)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 37,810
Likes: 583
From: ɐʍ 'ǝlʇʇɐǝs
Premier Member
One also has to check the tire weights. Even if the wheels only weigh 18lbs. (that is pretty light if you are referring to the 18 x 9.5" rear) A 275-40-18 is going to have some heft to it
 
  #6  
Old 02-27-2006 | 03:41 PM
godmans's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (22)
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,239
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by Gdup35sedan
No negative performance effects... your talking about going from a wheel that weighs 23+ lbs. to one that weighs 18. Your losing a significant amount of rotational mass which will increase performance and the wider tires out back will grip more. So the answer to your question is NO!
-GP-
That's wrong period

Scenario 1)
If he goes from a stock 17 x 7.5 to 18 x 8.5 / 9.5 ; he is gaining tremendous amount of rotational mass ~ K * M * R^2, which originates mainly from the increase in radius. An increase in rotational radius will have an impact of ~(delta R)^2 that is actually A LOT when compared with the decrease in Mass from 23lb to 18lb.

***(K is a constant depending on the distribution of mass, in this case the mass mostly resides in the outer rim; M the mass; R the radius of rotation)

Scenario 2)
If he goes from a stock 18 x 7.5 / 8 to 18 x 8.5 / 9.5 ; even though the radius is constant in this case, the increase in Rim width will add rotational mass (please notice that I mean rotational mass, instead of the total mass of a rim that one will argue about). Moreover, the widened tire will also add rotational mass to the formula, which decreases the 0-60 or generally acceleration performance

Yet, handle wise, this should be a good upgrade; but the fact is, you are going to do worse in 0 - 60 or 1/4 mile with your intended upgrade

Cheers
 

Last edited by godmans; 02-27-2006 at 03:44 PM.
  #7  
Old 02-27-2006 | 04:34 PM
TheTrance's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton, AB
so what would be the best configuration for having better 0-60 times?
does that mean that the 18" rims are out of qustion godmans? stock sedan are 17s
I might just go with forged rims if the weight is an issue
the tires will be Toyo proxes T1
 
  #8  
Old 02-27-2006 | 04:45 PM
Gdup35sedan's Avatar
ENVautoDetailing.com
iTrader: (47)
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 9,257
Likes: 136
From: San Diego/Redondo Beach
Premier Member
Originally Posted by godmans
That's wrong period

Scenario 1)
If he goes from a stock 17 x 7.5 to 18 x 8.5 / 9.5 ; he is gaining tremendous amount of rotational mass ~ K * M * R^2, which originates mainly from the increase in radius. An increase in rotational radius will have an impact of ~(delta R)^2 that is actually A LOT when compared with the decrease in Mass from 23lb to 18lb.

***(K is a constant depending on the distribution of mass, in this case the mass mostly resides in the outer rim; M the mass; R the radius of rotation)

Scenario 2)
If he goes from a stock 18 x 7.5 / 8 to 18 x 8.5 / 9.5 ; even though the radius is constant in this case, the increase in Rim width will add rotational mass (please notice that I mean rotational mass, instead of the total mass of a rim that one will argue about). Moreover, the widened tire will also add rotational mass to the formula, which decreases the 0-60 or generally acceleration performance

Yet, handle wise, this should be a good upgrade; but the fact is, you are going to do worse in 0 - 60 or 1/4 mile with your intended upgrade

Cheers

Bro,
i agree with some of what your saying but even though you're increasing the diameter and the width you're still losing weight while increasing traction which is important on the track. It's NOT going to make his 0-60(which doesnt meant $hit) or 1/4 mile worse.

So trance, no 18's arent out of the question, if you want the best performance on the track then go with some light weight 17's but 18's will still be a good choice if you want looks and performance.
-GP-
 
  #9  
Old 02-27-2006 | 04:51 PM
doogie's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 720
Likes: 3
From: Denton, TX
You guys are splitting hairs. Just add some NOS and stick some 20 inch spinners on.
 
  #10  
Old 02-27-2006 | 05:06 PM
perry05G35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,092
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX
Get the plenum spacer and your staggard 18" wheels and of course a z tube wouldn't hurt you can get all of those modds for a reasonable price and not only will your handling improve so will your 0-60 times. Shopping for wheels can improve your 0-60 times but you will gain more by focusing on performance and handling in addition to 0-60.
 
  #11  
Old 02-27-2006 | 05:08 PM
perry05G35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,092
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX
Originally Posted by jimmyc13
Trance - you may not want to run what he recommends....as that setup will most likely rub in the rear. It's been confirmed that 275/35/19 tires rub in the rear, with a stock suspension. Follow my math:

275/35/19: 275 x 0.35 = 96.25mm = 3.79 in
3.79 in x 2 = 7.58 in.
7.58 in + 19" rim = 26.58 in (larger OD than stock..plus you're running a much wider tire, so this rubs)

Now he's recommending 275/40/18...following the same math as above, but with an 18 in. rim yields 26.66 in. (or 26.8 as he says above). You may want to ask around before going w/ that setup, unless you want to roll your fenders. Obviously the offset will affect this as well.

DaddysG35 - I'm just trying to prevent him from making a mistake...

Let me know if you want that link where 275/35/19's rub.

Good luck.
Jimmy he is talking about getting 18" not 19"
 
  #12  
Old 02-27-2006 | 05:17 PM
TheTrance's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton, AB
Originally Posted by perry05G35
Get the plenum spacer and your staggard 18" wheels and of course a z tube wouldn't hurt you can get all of those modds for a reasonable price and not only will your handling improve so will your 0-60 times. Shopping for wheels can improve your 0-60 times but you will gain more by focusing on performance and handling in addition to 0-60.

ive got the Z tube and stillen CAI sitting here waiting for the weather to get nice so i can put them in hehe
 
  #13  
Old 02-27-2006 | 05:48 PM
ITmenace's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by jimmyc13
Trance - you may not want to run what he recommends....as that setup will most likely rub in the rear. It's been confirmed that 275/35/19 tires rub in the rear, with a stock suspension. Follow my math:
It's my undertanding that the only way this config will rub in the rear will be due to wrong offsets. If proper offset is chosen for the rear, I believe +45 and above to be conservative, he'll not encounter any problems.
 
  #14  
Old 02-27-2006 | 06:04 PM
Nickk6's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,936
Likes: 4
From: Laguna Niguel, CA
Originally Posted by ITmenace
It's my undertanding that the only way this config will rub in the rear will be due to wrong offsets. If proper offset is chosen for the rear, I believe +45 and above to be conservative, he'll not encounter any problems.
I was going to quote Jimmy about this and say the same thing. However, I have a 45 offset on my rear tires and they rub with a 275/35/19. However, my tires are not being damaged, they simply make a noise when hitting the fender. And it is only by an 1/8 of an inch, I need to slightly bend in the fender with a bat and this should solve it. I'd say something below 45 and over 38 should prevent rubbing.
 
  #15  
Old 02-27-2006 | 06:11 PM
TheTrance's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton, AB
im going for +38 front and either +42 and +45 on the rear...
its not very easy finding a company that ships to Canada
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: wheels and tires and performance



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:55 PM.