why can't i beat my friend's '06 330i?
#121
09-18-2006, 05:30 PM
Originally Posted by Nickk6
I've not driven at the track yet, my best 1/4 time was in a friends 2000 GT stang, it was a 14.1 in 85* weather. Professionals usually run these cars at 14.0, so .1 off is not bad. Car was stock except for missing the mufflers and lowered 
I've launched my car plenty of times to have a feel for it. This winter I will take the car to the track when temps are in the 60s.
I've launched my car plenty of times to have a feel for it. This winter I will take the car to the track when temps are in the 60s.
I love those cars. My buddies have a couple new edge 5MT Stangs. They both ran 14.1s stock. Good luck on the runs this Fall.
#122
09-18-2006, 05:52 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Chesapeake Bay, MD.
Posts: 681
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveB
Not true. F-Body and Vette owners typically see better ET/MPH with the automatics. Turbo Supra, 300ZX TTs, and 911 TT are also faster thanks to the fact that they can build boost with a brake torque and no boost is lost between shifts.
I'm with SixFive on this one, 8 times out of 10, I'm certain I'll be a similiarly modded G35 6MT. I've always been dead on about this car when I said it would run 14.4s in warm weather and 14.3s in cool weather stock (unless you believe a Z-pipe adds power). I'm pretty certain my 5AT will run 14.2s, possibly a 14.1 with the spacer which is faster than 95% of the modded NA G35s (5AT or 6MT) on this site.
I'm with SixFive on this one, 8 times out of 10, I'm certain I'll be a similiarly modded G35 6MT. I've always been dead on about this car when I said it would run 14.4s in warm weather and 14.3s in cool weather stock (unless you believe a Z-pipe adds power). I'm pretty certain my 5AT will run 14.2s, possibly a 14.1 with the spacer which is faster than 95% of the modded NA G35s (5AT or 6MT) on this site.
This all makes sense since trap speeds are an indicator of power. 6MT's will put more power to the ground as a result of the autos higher drivetrain loss. But that being said, autos are king of the track with a very large majority of fast cars being auto. Same applies to the street. With a good TC and some sticky tires, autos can do very well on the street.
#123
09-18-2006, 06:17 PM
How are you having problems with wheel spin on a 05 Auto? Most of what I read here is a small chirp is about the most you can expect from an auto launch.
Originally Posted by MySilverG35
. I try power braking, manumatic, trac. control off, everything. I did beat him one time but he claimed he spun the tires. I also have a problem controlling wheel spin. .
#124
09-18-2006, 06:19 PM
#125
09-18-2006, 06:29 PM
Originally Posted by Jeff92se
How are you having problems with wheel spin on a 05 Auto? Most of what I read here is a small chirp is about the most you can expect from an auto launch.
#126
09-18-2006, 06:31 PM
Originally Posted by Jeff92se
How are you having problems with wheel spin on a 05 Auto? Most of what I read here is a small chirp is about the most you can expect from an auto launch.
) but that shouldn't make that much of a different.That said, severe wheel spin shouldn't be a problem if launched correctly... enough brake torquing to chip and offer an aggressive launch without being overly aggressive.
#127
09-18-2006, 06:32 PM
#128
09-18-2006, 06:37 PM
I used 235/45/17's. Not as aggressive as your no doubt, but still I am able to get some pretty decent spin if I really wanted to. (And I donno about you guys since it sounds like alotta you can only get chirps when brake torquing, but I dont have to brake torque to chip I've found. Though brake torquing will give the better launch anyway.)
#130
09-18-2006, 07:37 PM
#132
09-18-2006, 10:33 PM
Originally Posted by DaveB
Like I've told you twice now, you post your best 1/4 mile slip (increment by increment), the track, and DA conditions (I can correct to DA if needed) and we'll see who's honestly quicker 
My best ET/MPH was in near sea level like conditions so there's no correcting needed. I've NEVER contended that the 5AT was the faster car, but it's not remotely as slow as people think. SixFive, BossSho, and myself have proven this. In a 1/4 mile race, mod for mod, and on regular tires, it should be damn close. I've been watching G35s and 350Zs race at my track since 2002. I know what they're capable of at my track.
As for racing on the street, it's ABSOLUTELY meaningless. If you outreact the other driver by just a mere 0.5 seconds (something you really couldn't even see), you'll have a huge advantage. HUGE. Racing on the strip tells the truth. Everytime.
My best ET/MPH was in near sea level like conditions so there's no correcting needed. I've NEVER contended that the 5AT was the faster car, but it's not remotely as slow as people think. SixFive, BossSho, and myself have proven this. In a 1/4 mile race, mod for mod, and on regular tires, it should be damn close. I've been watching G35s and 350Zs race at my track since 2002. I know what they're capable of at my track. As for racing on the street, it's ABSOLUTELY meaningless. If you outreact the other driver by just a mere 0.5 seconds (something you really couldn't even see), you'll have a huge advantage. HUGE. Racing on the strip tells the truth. Everytime.
#133
09-21-2006, 10:53 AM
Originally Posted by allforthecash
if you had a 6mt you wouldn't have a problem....auto vs auto the bmw will win (stock vs stock) on the road....
i'm interested to know what a 6mt vs 6mt would do
i'm interested to know what a 6mt vs 6mt would do
In this article, the Motor Trend guys apparently got better numbers with the
2005 G35 auto over the 2006 BMW....as far as 1/4mile and 0 to 60...
14.7 sec @ 95.1 mph(BMW)14.7 sec @ 95.9 mph(G35)
0-60 6.6(BMW) 6.5(G35)
same specs as the 2005 model....
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...ecs_price.html
Last edited by dec55; 09-21-2006 at 11:05 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
