How many of you would be interested in a G25?
#1
How many of you would be interested in a G25?
The 306hp G35 is nice, but I still wouldn't mind having the VQ25HR/G25. Although there have been no official reports it should be around at least 215 or so. It's not that I have a problem with gas prices, it's just that I don't feel the need to outaccelerate everything else on the road. And the potential is certainly there. The Lexus IS250 will attest to that.
So, if Infiniti brought the 2.5 Skyline to the US, how many of you would be interested?
So, if Infiniti brought the 2.5 Skyline to the US, how many of you would be interested?
#2
#4
Will the next question be, "who would be interested in a G45"? But serially, there is enough difference between Lеxus IS buyers and Infіniti G buyers that a less-powerful G wouldn't necessarily sell well even if the Lеxus IS250 sells well. A Lеxus tends to be an alternative to a Mеrcedes, a cаr to be seen in, while an Infіniti tends to be an alternative to a BМW, a cаr to drive.
Last edited by DWP; 09-29-2006 at 11:17 AM.
#5
Originally Posted by DWP
Will the next question be, "who would be interested in a G45"? But serially, there is enough difference between Lеxus IS buyers and Infіniti G buyers that a less-powerful G wouldn't necessarily sell well even if the Lеxus IS250 sells well. A Lеxus tends to be an alternative to a Mеrcedes, a cаr to be seen in, while an Infіniti tends to be an alternative to a BMW, a cаr to drive.
#6
Originally Posted by andy2
Well said. I wouldn't want one either. I would say the G personality is its engine.
EXHAUST NOTE - whew its nice!
![Smilie](https://g35driver.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
But yeah, at the upper 20's price range maybe. It'll never happen tho. Infiniti wants to keep their brand up and not make the Acura RSX mistake.
Last edited by tiblot; 09-29-2006 at 12:07 AM.
#7
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Trending Topics
#8
Florida G35 Club, General Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Cruising the waters of FL
Posts: 6,876
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
NO! With a lower price point, you now flood the streets with the same car (body lines, not engine). While I see Gs everywhere, its not nearly as bad as BMW 3s, Merc C class, etc, Lexus IS, etc. The G becomes a "me too" car, more ricers start driving them, resale value goes down.
Worst thing that could happen IMO.
Now, a G45 on the other hand...
Worst thing that could happen IMO.
Now, a G45 on the other hand...
#9
#10
#12
Originally Posted by jrock65
I'd be interested. It would actually be a better handler than the G35, since it would be lighter overall and have better front/rear weight distribution.
As to the 1st question, I wouldn't be interested. I want to see a G37 with alot of torque, 325-350 at a low RPM to get the car really moving. HP is a little over rated in my opinion.
#13
Originally Posted by vn3115
How much better can the weight get, it is really good already.
As to the 1st question, I wouldn't be interested. I want to see a G37 with alot of torque, 325-350 at a low RPM to get the car really moving. HP is a little over rated in my opinion.
As to the 1st question, I wouldn't be interested. I want to see a G37 with alot of torque, 325-350 at a low RPM to get the car really moving. HP is a little over rated in my opinion.
#14
Nissan shouldn't do it
1. Nissan can already sell cars very well in lower price ranges and Infiniti needs to pick up where they leave off and not before. Infiniti was created for Nissan to penetrate into a new market, so their products should go upwards not downwards. Selling a g25 might do well in the short term, but would devalue the brand as a whole among its target customers in the long term. You would end up with another Acura.
2. The G35 is not the fastest car in its class. So you already won't be out accelerating that many people. Nissan Japan took a less agressive route with this G35, and while it's the fastest car in class for the money (vs is250 and 328), it's the third quickest in overall class (vs is350 and 335) in terms of raw power.
3. A less powerful G35 would make the car harder to sell, not easier. On a larger basis, it would dillute the performance aspect to the Infiniti name. I would assume this to be important to Nissan Japan. In addition, the cost savings wouldn't be that great since the basic 3.5L VQ is used in so many other cars, making the incremental costs not that much higher. You could argue that the new G35 uses a new VQ engine, but the technology of this new engine will be needed for lower end cars anyway and in addition, a number of cars will utilize this new HR engine incl g35 coupe, sedan, and the GT-R will probably also benefit. In any case, whenther its an HR or not, there's likely a lot of production similarities between 3.5L VQ components and manufacturing/tooling...so again, the incremental cost difference probably wouldn't make the change worth it, considering current and future production.
1. Nissan can already sell cars very well in lower price ranges and Infiniti needs to pick up where they leave off and not before. Infiniti was created for Nissan to penetrate into a new market, so their products should go upwards not downwards. Selling a g25 might do well in the short term, but would devalue the brand as a whole among its target customers in the long term. You would end up with another Acura.
2. The G35 is not the fastest car in its class. So you already won't be out accelerating that many people. Nissan Japan took a less agressive route with this G35, and while it's the fastest car in class for the money (vs is250 and 328), it's the third quickest in overall class (vs is350 and 335) in terms of raw power.
3. A less powerful G35 would make the car harder to sell, not easier. On a larger basis, it would dillute the performance aspect to the Infiniti name. I would assume this to be important to Nissan Japan. In addition, the cost savings wouldn't be that great since the basic 3.5L VQ is used in so many other cars, making the incremental costs not that much higher. You could argue that the new G35 uses a new VQ engine, but the technology of this new engine will be needed for lower end cars anyway and in addition, a number of cars will utilize this new HR engine incl g35 coupe, sedan, and the GT-R will probably also benefit. In any case, whenther its an HR or not, there's likely a lot of production similarities between 3.5L VQ components and manufacturing/tooling...so again, the incremental cost difference probably wouldn't make the change worth it, considering current and future production.
Last edited by tekknikal; 09-29-2006 at 02:59 PM.