Studio on Wheels - Sound Impressions
#121
#122
Well now that I've had 3 weeks to play with the sound system and hear it in different environments I must say that I'm changing my opinions about the sound quality of this system. It is indeed a very musical sounding system and I find it to be pleasing to listen to, even for those grueling long drives on the highway. Because the car is reasonably quiet on 50% of the highway surfaces the bottom end hangs in there nicely without having to crank the volume considerably to compete with the road noise. Plus, when you feel the need to turn it up, it never seems to sound strained like so many other oem systems tend to do.
With well recorded material, it reproduces detail surprisingly well, holding true to the basic tonality of the mixes without the phony hyped sound that most folks seem to gravitate towards (that is, until they hear it done right). I've found myself continually being surprised and pleased by the sounds I hear as I introduce more and different styles of music into this system. Very nice top end and mids - not fatiguing at all. Overall a very well done, relatively accurate sounding car stereo setup, really a great find for an oem system. I can live with this one.
With well recorded material, it reproduces detail surprisingly well, holding true to the basic tonality of the mixes without the phony hyped sound that most folks seem to gravitate towards (that is, until they hear it done right). I've found myself continually being surprised and pleased by the sounds I hear as I introduce more and different styles of music into this system. Very nice top end and mids - not fatiguing at all. Overall a very well done, relatively accurate sounding car stereo setup, really a great find for an oem system. I can live with this one.
#123
Originally Posted by starstreak
Am I missing something here? I would figure, this system would kick heavy bass if it wanted to. I think teh G35 is the ONLY car that I know that has 3-ways in the front doors, including 10in speakers. AND a 10in sub in the read deck. Something isnt right.
#124
IF YOU JUDGE HOW COULD A SOUND SYSTEM IS BY HOW MANY WINDOWS IT CAN RATTLE, THEN THE SOUND SYSTEM SUCKS, if you truly enjoy music and dont a need a giant thump to let the neighboor hood know your home than this system is for you. I think its great and handles well at high volumes, you can still hear the music not just bass and rattles
#125
Well no, but the way everybody makes it sound, it can't do bass well at all.
Originally Posted by sotagear
I believe the idea for this system was to lean towards accuracy and balanced sonics, rather than booming bass. The driver sizes are there to produce reasonably low bass, and it does with the right recordings, but not if you're expecting after market sub-woofer bass. That isn't what it seems they were going for here. It sounds like you would be a good candidate to invest in an external powered sub if you really feel you're missing something.
#128
Originally Posted by RLampke
I wonder how many people that think that SOWW sounds great, also have access/own a high end HT system [$25K+] or other hi-end OEM automotive offering that this system markets itself against.
That would be an interesting poll if everyone actually voted honestly.
That would be an interesting poll if everyone actually voted honestly.
Is that true that it's being marketed against a $25K home system? That seems a bit hard to believe and even if it is, as a consumer I wouldn't expect that performance in an OEM auto system in a car at this level.
I doubt many people on this site own or even have regular exposure to a $25K home system.
Last edited by RBull; 12-07-2006 at 04:05 PM.
#129
Originally Posted by RLampke
According to Bose and/or Infiniti, this system was modeled against a $35K home "reference system". So it would be interesting to see if others that have Hi-end systems do review this system favorably. Unfortunately they [Bose] will not divest what this “Hi-end” system is composed of - at least I have not seen this in print anywhere.
#130
Whaaa?
Originally Posted by sprintdammit
One other thing to noe, Feng, is that forward movement of a vehicle causes a decided roll-off of low frequencies reaching the ear due to the doppler effect.
Originally Posted by sprintdammit
(snip)
At the end of the day, audio is one of the most subjective topics ever addressed by mankind. No system will ever appease the "masses".
At the end of the day, audio is one of the most subjective topics ever addressed by mankind. No system will ever appease the "masses".
John Feng
#131
Originally Posted by RLampke
According to Bose and/or Infiniti, this system was modeled against a $35K home "reference system". So it would be interesting to see if others that have Hi-end systems do review this system favorably. Unfortunately they [Bose] will not divest what this “Hi-end” system is composed of - at least I have not seen this in print anywhere.
You get what you pay for. If a consumer thinks they are getting a $35K reference audio system for the price of SOW then they're an idiot.
#132
You're getting pretty loose with those allegations..
Originally Posted by RLampke
Your right - it's not where near what can be obtained for $35K or even $3K for that matter, in regards to HT based [home] systems. If that's the case, then why the big marketing campaign about it..? If Bose is going to make unsubstantiated claims about itself and its products [referenced against a $35K HT setup - SOW], then it should be able to perform close to the claim being made - clearly it does not.
John Feng
#133
Originally Posted by MiamiG35sedan
"Modeled on" does not mean "sounds equal to". It is unrealistic to think that this OEM option is going to equate to a more exensive aftermarket home or vehicle setup. As I stated in my earlier post, I believe the SOW is a very good OEM setup for it's price point. My Eclipse/DLS Ultimate/Reference/Cascade Audio aftermarket system in my 2004 G35 does sound better than the SOW, but costs twice as much as SOW. I can tell you my aftermarket system does not sound twice as good as the SOW. 20%-25% better maybe, but not 100% better.
You get what you pay for. If a consumer thinks they are getting a $35K reference audio system for the price of SOW then they're an idiot.
You get what you pay for. If a consumer thinks they are getting a $35K reference audio system for the price of SOW then they're an idiot.
#134
#135
John Feng said "the guy who tuned the SOW system is a very good professional musician".
Maybe so, but i'll bet you my pink slip he was not into Heavy Metal or
Hard Rock. The "Hard" in "Hard Rock" means it hits "Hard". The SOW
while it may be accurate and sound great for classical music or Jazz is
simply incapable of producing hard hitting bass.
Honestly, the little sub that came with on my 129.00 pc speakers produces better bass than the SOW and it has an volume adjustment on the sub that allows me to dial it in specifically how I like it.
The sad thing is, the system could probably rock but with no way to effectively adjust the EQ (not even a bass boost button) the system
will never be suitable for hard rock.
Maybe so, but i'll bet you my pink slip he was not into Heavy Metal or
Hard Rock. The "Hard" in "Hard Rock" means it hits "Hard". The SOW
while it may be accurate and sound great for classical music or Jazz is
simply incapable of producing hard hitting bass.
Honestly, the little sub that came with on my 129.00 pc speakers produces better bass than the SOW and it has an volume adjustment on the sub that allows me to dial it in specifically how I like it.
The sad thing is, the system could probably rock but with no way to effectively adjust the EQ (not even a bass boost button) the system
will never be suitable for hard rock.