G35 Sedan V36 2007- 08 Discussion about the 2nd Generation G35 Sedan 2007 - 08

G37 sedan fuel economy?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Mar 18, 2008 | 09:26 PM
  #31  
350Zed's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,156
Likes: 8
From: Toronto, Canada
Originally Posted by ugaexploder
marketing, is that what you have a degree in? must've been real tough.
Ah the old "you're smart you must be a loser" argument. That worked well on the playground in grade 4. I'm glad it still works well for you.

PS - No, I don't have a marketing degree, but apparently I fooled you into believing I do.
.
 

Last edited by 350Zed; Mar 18, 2008 at 09:38 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2008 | 09:37 PM
  #32  
350Zed's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,156
Likes: 8
From: Toronto, Canada
Lightbulb

Originally Posted by Mr_Ryte
Guys; don't bother trying to figure out the marketing strategy of Nissan/Infiniti. You'll only end up with a MAJOR migraine.
I disagree.

Nissan/Infiniti has a fairly simple marketing strategy in North America of being the value-performance leader in every segment they compete in. Typically, that means the highest stated horsepower rating in each respective class, while also maintaining a cost model near the bottom of each segment.

The G35 directly targetted the BMW 330i and Audi A4 3.0 when it was first released. Today, BMW has gone upmarket with the 335i, Audi has taken a less performance-oriented approach with the A4 (and has focused its higher-performance offerings at a higher price-point with S4 and RS4 models), and Lexus and Mercedes have both recognized the entry-level performance sedan market as a key medium volume segment.

I think that Infiniti sees the 335i as the new benchmark, and will directly aim a new G37 Sedan directly at it for '09. They'll out-spec BMW on paper with 330 bhp (vs. 300 bhp for the 335i), while at the same time continuing to undercut BMW on cost by a wide margin. You'll also see the 7AT tranny give the G37 shorter gearing to give it a 335i-matching 0-60 time (which, unfortunately, is the benchmark used by all the car rages to compare similar product, along with peak bhp ratings).

See... that wasn't so hard.
.
 
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2008 | 10:46 PM
  #33  
mIKE's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,408
Likes: 7
From: Orange County, CA
Originally Posted by 350Zed
I disagree.

Nissan/Infiniti has a fairly simple marketing strategy in North America of being the value-performance leader in every segment they compete in. Typically, that means the highest stated horsepower rating in each respective class, while also maintaining a cost model near the bottom of each segment.

The G35 directly targetted the BMW 330i and Audi A4 3.0 when it was first released. Today, BMW has gone upmarket with the 335i, Audi has taken a less performance-oriented approach with the A4 (and has focused its higher-performance offerings at a higher price-point with S4 and RS4 models), and Lexus and Mercedes have both recognized the entry-level performance sedan market as a key medium volume segment.

I think that Infiniti sees the 335i as the new benchmark, and will directly aim a new G37 Sedan directly at it for '09. They'll out-spec BMW on paper with 330 bhp (vs. 300 bhp for the 335i), while at the same time continuing to undercut BMW on cost by a wide margin. You'll also see the 7AT tranny give the G37 shorter gearing to give it a 335i-matching 0-60 time (which, unfortunately, is the benchmark used by all the car rages to compare similar product, along with peak bhp ratings).

See... that wasn't so hard.
.
Infiniti sees the 328 as the benchmark.

Yes, I know what you're thinking, and EVERY SINGLE EMPLOYEE at our dealership said the same thing.
 
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2008 | 09:12 AM
  #34  
350Zed's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,156
Likes: 8
From: Toronto, Canada
Originally Posted by Mike@RiversideInfiniti
Infiniti sees the 328 as the benchmark.
 
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2008 | 12:38 PM
  #35  
Wei's Avatar
Wei
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
i guess it could work either ways,
if they see 328 as benchmark, for the same price, the G offer more performance
if they see 335 as benchmark, the G is priced lower for similarly equipped model
more bang for the buck with the G either ways

they need a high performance model now, like bimmer/audi,.. 3.7 doesn't cut it, but 3.8 will (vhr38tt)
 
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2008 | 01:27 PM
  #36  
kevink's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,007
Likes: 2
From: Oklahoma
Gas mileage is becoming more important for me, and the poor current fuel economy is a factor.

Compared to the low of $1.259/gal, the current $3.20/gal is significantly higher. I can afford it, but don't like spending the money, nor sending the fuel dollars to people like Chavez or countries like SA.

Which means that I am more likely to do one of the following: buy a car with significantly better fuel economy in a couple years, like a hybrid, or just keep the car. Still be burning the fuel, but still overall cheaper to keep the car.

The possible G37 sedan sounds nice except for fuel economy. Hardly a must buy.
 
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2008 | 06:38 PM
  #37  
stardust's Avatar
Premier Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 446
Likes: 1
From: Des Plaines, IL
Premier Member

Originally Posted by kevink
The possible G37 sedan sounds nice except for fuel economy. Hardly a must buy.
Seeing as the 6-speed g37 gets better mileage then the 6-speed g35 I really dont think the mileage is going to go down with the 3.7 in the sedan.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jsimonk
General Media Share
17
Dec 22, 2023 03:49 PM
MR M37s
G37 Coupe V36 2008+
14
Oct 30, 2015 08:32 AM
newg37
G35 Coupe V35 2003 - 07
1
Jul 26, 2015 09:32 AM
brian_z
New Members Check In
0
Jul 22, 2015 09:19 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:38 PM.