G35 Sedan V36 2007- 08 Discussion about the 2nd Generation G35 Sedan 2007 - 08

UpRev Osiris Tune, Dyno Sheets

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Dec 30, 2011 | 04:16 AM
  #16  
pbabajan's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 748
Likes: 36
From: San Fernando, CA (so. cal.)
ur car sounds nice!
 
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2012 | 03:15 PM
  #17  
mw08G35S's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
wow! these numbers are almost hard to believe. either it's generous of the 6speed is really something else...

tho without bringing up another dynojet v mustang thread... a little hard to be convinced? stock 306 bhp at the flywheel with an cat/HFC/underdrive pulley and intake for 330 whp?
G37s can't even make that with all the boltons after tuning.
 

Last edited by mw08G35S; Jan 1, 2012 at 03:21 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2012 | 04:16 PM
  #18  
apexi957's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,677
Likes: 53
From: Atlanta
I'm curious as well now...
 
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2012 | 04:56 PM
  #19  
rich2342's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 123
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by vqsmile
mmhmm . . . and especially Church's.
Ha ha..right. Dyno queens for sure over at the Z boards too. Church is infamous for being so much higher than others.
 
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2012 | 05:25 PM
  #20  
vqsmile's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,945
Likes: 427
From: SF bayarea (925)
Originally Posted by mw08G35S
wow! these numbers are almost hard to believe. either it's generous of the 6speed is really something else...

tho without bringing up another dynojet v mustang thread... a little hard to be convinced? stock 306 bhp at the flywheel with an cat/HFC/underdrive pulley and intake for 330 whp?
G37s can't even make that with all the boltons after tuning.
Originally Posted by apexi957
I'm curious as well now...
All you have to do is look at the baseline numbers.They're practically what you'd read at the crank. There's no way the drivetrain losses are that low.
 
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2012 | 03:20 PM
  #21  
rvanderwerf's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 686
Likes: 44
From: Round Rock, TX
My baseline at uprev in austin was 267 and was over 100 degrees out.
 
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2012 | 03:53 PM
  #22  
vqsmile's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,945
Likes: 427
From: SF bayarea (925)
Originally Posted by rvanderwerf
My baseline at uprev in austin was 267 and was over 100 degrees out.
267 what?
 
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2012 | 04:00 PM
  #23  
LakeShore_Slate's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 935
Likes: 12
From: Central Florida
Originally Posted by vqsmile
267 what?
wheel HP I imagine...
 
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2012 | 04:04 PM
  #24  
luger303's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 690
Likes: 23
From: Denver
Originally Posted by rvanderwerf
My baseline at uprev in austin was 267 and was over 100 degrees out.
How about after the tune? Thats about right for stock hp because mine was 229 baseline up here. Ha Ha, we will never know the truth. Mine is faster just for the sake of conversation. jk
 
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2012 | 04:13 PM
  #25  
vqsmile's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,945
Likes: 427
From: SF bayarea (925)
Originally Posted by LakeShore_Slate
wheel HP I imagine...
If so, that would be about right; it's definitely too high for a torque number.
 
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2012 | 05:59 PM
  #26  
rvanderwerf's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 686
Likes: 44
From: Round Rock, TX
Originally Posted by luger303
How about after the tune? Thats about right for stock hp because mine was 229 baseline up here. Ha Ha, we will never know the truth. Mine is faster just for the sake of conversation. jk
Haven't gotten my tune yet but ill post it up when I do.
 
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2012 | 09:24 PM
  #27  
LakeShore_Slate's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 935
Likes: 12
From: Central Florida
Originally Posted by luger303
how about after the tune? Thats about right for stock hp because mine was 229 baseline up here. Ha ha, we will never know the truth. Mine is faster just for the sake of conversation. Jk
229 tq?
 
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2012 | 09:57 PM
  #28  
luger303's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 690
Likes: 23
From: Denver
No 184 tq 229 hp, that was with the exhaust and intake change and no tune. So I guess not a true baseline. You can check out my thread on it. Sorry to the OP for intruding.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
g.spot
G35 Cars
12
May 9, 2016 10:54 PM
Red G Coupe
Tuner & Dyno
9
Jan 14, 2016 01:13 AM
AJC128
New Members Check In
1
Nov 1, 2015 11:55 AM
atomevolution
Engine - Exhaust
1
Oct 12, 2015 01:00 PM
Usman Ali
G35 Coupe V35 2003 - 07
8
Oct 4, 2015 08:23 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:41 AM.