G35 Sedan V36 2007- 08 Discussion about the 2nd Generation G35 Sedan 2007 - 08

back to HPS and lovin it

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Aug 15, 2011 | 01:19 AM
  #16  
kool_yaar's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 5,208
Likes: 185
From: Somewhere
^ search on myg37 and you will find some very good third party private dynos from reliable people showing acceptable gains from R2C, Stillen 3G and takeda in summer temps and high humidity, so thats as good of a proof as anyone can give you but you'll have to spend some time searching.

As for the pipes i cant comment since i havent seen any third party private dyno but have seen one on the company site which showed i think 4whp gain.

But in the end yes our stock air intake systems are very nice but obviously not the best since these aftermarket intake companies are squeezing out 8-13whp which is quite a bit from intakes on our motors, also exhaust and ART pipes have shown to give GREAT gains, search on 370z forum as well, A LOT of dynos and believable info with proof rather than words. Hope this helps!
 
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2011 | 03:53 AM
  #17  
harp00n's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 479
Likes: 13
From: Ukraine, Kharkov
+1 to bat6wc, HPS tubes give noticeable increase in the throttle response! It almost eliminated the negative aspects of the ecu reflash "increased throttle sensitivity" that made my car dumb in the low rpm...
 
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2011 | 10:34 AM
  #18  
makeinu0's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 197
Likes: 4
From: Honolulu, Hi
OP if the difference in sound is noticeable, could you post up a video or something?
I've heard sound from different intakes, but not from HPS and stock filter. I searched online and got nothing.....
 
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2011 | 10:38 AM
  #19  
harp00n's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 479
Likes: 13
From: Ukraine, Kharkov
sound difference is almost not noticable, maybe a little more "growl" on the high rpm...

but i don't need any sound increase, as I got loud borla cat-back + berk's hfc.
 
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2011 | 12:29 PM
  #20  
djfarhan's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 14,344
Likes: 324
From: Dubai, UAE
dyno?
 
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2011 | 04:59 PM
  #21  
bat6wc's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,190
Likes: 29
From: St. Louis, MO
Originally Posted by harp00n
sound difference is almost not noticable, maybe a little more "growl" on the high rpm...

but i don't need any sound increase, as I got loud borla cat-back + berk's hfc.
+1. i havent dyno'd with these bc the cost of the dyno isnt worth it. all that matters is that I feel a difference in throttle response. HPS claims WHP increases.
 

Last edited by bat6wc; Aug 15, 2011 at 06:56 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2011 | 06:04 PM
  #22  
jimboG35x's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 334
Likes: 36
Hps is just a better route for better flow and maybe hp or tq,I use k&n drop ins with my set up.I just dont see spending 500 for intake especially if im just gona get 5hp from them,All u really need is a x pipe,test pipes and these hps tubes with k&n drop in filters and u prob get better results then getting a full exhaust and intakes.and u would spend half or less also.Thats just my opinion..
 
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2011 | 07:21 PM
  #23  
lefizzet's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 914
Likes: 46
From: Bergen County, NJ
Originally Posted by jimboG35x
Hps is just a better route for better flow and maybe hp or tq,I use k&n drop ins with my set up.I just dont see spending 500 for intake especially if im just gona get 5hp from them,All u really need is a x pipe,test pipes and these hps tubes with k&n drop in filters and u prob get better results then getting a full exhaust and intakes.and u would spend half or less also.Thats just my opinion..
This makes no sense. tp and xpipe would be included in a full exhaust, unless you just mean catback.
 
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2011 | 09:28 PM
  #24  
jimboG35x's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 334
Likes: 36
im saying if u didnt wana wast over 1000 for a exhaust system u can get those tp,and x pipe for like 500 total..
 
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2011 | 09:32 PM
  #25  
lefizzet's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 914
Likes: 46
From: Bergen County, NJ
Originally Posted by jimboG35x
im saying if u didnt wana wast over 1000 for a exhaust system u can get those tp,and x pipe for like 500 total..
Yeah...but that wouldn't outperform a full exhaust and intake.
 
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2011 | 10:38 PM
  #26  
bat6wc's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,190
Likes: 29
From: St. Louis, MO
Originally Posted by lefizzet
Yeah...but that wouldn't outperform a full exhaust and intake.
+1 (on full exhaust at least). Ill tell you, at first i was very hesitant and frustrated that a catback was going to cost $1000+ but after buying the stillen and having it for several months, i must say it was a very good purchase. worth the money. a full exhaust will produce good gains. Add a gen 3 intakes then a TUNE and you are set.

but we are getting off topic. lets get back to how great the pipes and bar look.
 
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2011 | 11:11 PM
  #27  
Anton_Chigurh's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,513
Likes: 59
From: Gillette Stadium
Hell my car feels slower now with intakes
 
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2011 | 08:20 AM
  #28  
Greekboy115's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,279
Likes: 10
From: Peabody, MA
I still believe that when I took off my R2C's and put on my stock setup with the HPS tubes I get more out of that engine. Personally, I am very pleased with running the HPS setup with aFe filters. Doesn't sound as nice as the R2C but I do think you get more bang for the buck. Haven't experienced anywhere near as many intakes as Bat but between the two I feel like go for R2C if you want a great sound with top of the line filters and go HPS and hi-flow filters if you want a great bang for the buck and I am willing to bet more performance overall. Thats my $ .02
 
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2011 | 10:10 PM
  #29  
bat6wc's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,190
Likes: 29
From: St. Louis, MO
Originally Posted by Greekboy115
I still believe that when I took off my R2C's and put on my stock setup with the HPS tubes I get more out of that engine. Personally, I am very pleased with running the HPS setup with aFe filters. Doesn't sound as nice as the R2C but I do think you get more bang for the buck. Haven't experienced anywhere near as many intakes as Bat but between the two I feel like go for R2C if you want a great sound with top of the line filters and go HPS and hi-flow filters if you want a great bang for the buck and I am willing to bet more performance overall. Thats my $ .02
exactly
 
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2011 | 04:38 AM
  #30  
harp00n's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 479
Likes: 13
From: Ukraine, Kharkov
r2c intake will surely make any vq35hr dumb in the low rpm, because of the decreased low torque (wrong AFR w/o tune)

and HPS tubes don't affect AFR, as they are situatued after MAF!
 
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:34 PM.