Dyno results
Yes, baseline run included all bolt-ons on stock ECU. Final run with Uprev Orisis 93 pump map.
Did a 0-60 Dragy this morning using launch control via my electronic throttle controller. Results verified:
Blizzaks, 27 degrees F, 4% upslope, 621 ft above sea level, -2076 ft DA
0-10: 0.58s
0-20: 1.24s
0-30: 2.00s
0-40: 2.91s
0-50: 3.92s
0-60: 5.19
0-60 (1 ft rollout): 4.91s
Blizzaks, 27 degrees F, 4% upslope, 621 ft above sea level, -2076 ft DA
0-10: 0.58s
0-20: 1.24s
0-30: 2.00s
0-40: 2.91s
0-50: 3.92s
0-60: 5.19
0-60 (1 ft rollout): 4.91s
I wish they had tools like Dragy when I was a kid, when they can estimate a 60' time it will be even better.
Kids these days literally don't know how good they have it, we used to have to use cones, 2-way radios, and a stopwatch unless you wanted to pay a fee to use the drag strip.
No access to slo mo camera to watch suspension travel on launch.
Fuel injection was mostly OBD1 and tuning options were severely limited so everyone was converting back to carb, only brand new cars were OBD2.
Gas was 0.98c per gallon when AM/PM came to town.
Good ol days.
Kids these days literally don't know how good they have it, we used to have to use cones, 2-way radios, and a stopwatch unless you wanted to pay a fee to use the drag strip.
No access to slo mo camera to watch suspension travel on launch.
Fuel injection was mostly OBD1 and tuning options were severely limited so everyone was converting back to carb, only brand new cars were OBD2.
Gas was 0.98c per gallon when AM/PM came to town.
Good ol days.
Trending Topics
When doing dragy runs to compare before and after tune/mods, or even to set a baseline 0-60mph is probably the worse metric you can do. Road surface, launch rpm and clutch management, shifting etc will all play a role making for highly inconsistent times, not too mention as some point more power will mean a slower 0-60 😅
Since you have a dragy you can do 30-90mph or 100-200km etc which will clearly show any power difference. There's actually a page filled with 30-90mph of various cars in the last 20 years to use as comparison. I believe the G35 V36 posted a 8.7 sec
Since you have a dragy you can do 30-90mph or 100-200km etc which will clearly show any power difference. There's actually a page filled with 30-90mph of various cars in the last 20 years to use as comparison. I believe the G35 V36 posted a 8.7 sec
Last edited by Serge Mullen; Mar 9, 2023 at 02:05 PM.
When doing dragy runs to compare before and after tune/mods, or even to set a baseline 0-60mph is probably the worse metric you can do. Road surface, launch rpm and clutch management, shifting etc will all play a role making for highly inconsistent times, not too mention as some point more power will mean a slower 0-60 😅
Since you have a dragy you can do 30-90mph or 100-200km etc which will clearly show any power difference. There's actually a page filled with 30-90mph of various cars in the last 20 years to use as comparison. I believe the G35 V36 posted a 8.7 sec
Since you have a dragy you can do 30-90mph or 100-200km etc which will clearly show any power difference. There's actually a page filled with 30-90mph of various cars in the last 20 years to use as comparison. I believe the G35 V36 posted a 8.7 sec
Anyway, my 0-60 dropped from 5.64 to 5.19, before and after mods, both runs with similar DA, altitude, and temps although the launch control feature via the electronic throttle controller certainly helped to drop that time.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





