Miserable Users
Guest
Posts: n/a
I'm going to try and steer us back again..
..And just say that I think you need to take into consideration who might have placed a MU on someone at one time. And the relationship that those people have.
I'm just speaking hypothetical here, but lets say a moderator did this action out of spite, because they could, rather than good reason... that wouldn't be very right in my eyes.
..And just say that I think you need to take into consideration who might have placed a MU on someone at one time. And the relationship that those people have.
I'm just speaking hypothetical here, but lets say a moderator did this action out of spite, because they could, rather than good reason... that wouldn't be very right in my eyes.
I'm going to try and steer us back again..
..And just say that I think you need to take into consideration who might have placed a MU on someone at one time. And the relationship that those people have.
I'm just speaking hypothetical here, but lets say a moderator did this action out of spite, because they could, rather than good reason... that wouldn't be very right in my eyes.
..And just say that I think you need to take into consideration who might have placed a MU on someone at one time. And the relationship that those people have.
I'm just speaking hypothetical here, but lets say a moderator did this action out of spite, because they could, rather than good reason... that wouldn't be very right in my eyes.
Bess' you not poke dat snake no mo' fo' while.
Again, only admins can do it. I assure you that none have done it out of spite.
For someone who's never gotten it you really got your feathers ruffled over it.
For someone who's never gotten it you really got your feathers ruffled over it.
Last edited by TIAN; Dec 20, 2013 at 04:00 PM. Reason: spelling.
I'm going to try and steer us back again..
..And just say that I think you need to take into consideration who might have placed a MU on someone at one time. And the relationship that those people have.
I'm just speaking hypothetical here, but lets say a moderator did this action out of spite, because they could, rather than good reason... that wouldn't be very right in my eyes.
..And just say that I think you need to take into consideration who might have placed a MU on someone at one time. And the relationship that those people have.
I'm just speaking hypothetical here, but lets say a moderator did this action out of spite, because they could, rather than good reason... that wouldn't be very right in my eyes.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Side note 2: Maybe we should look into getting a block button. Like a actual block a person where you can't see anything from that person. It would be better than ignore where you can still see when someone posts and just have to click "view post" to see it.
I suggested this before and it was supposed to be looked in to.
I suggested this before and it was supposed to be looked in to.
You've never been on MU
Check your networkNot true.
Side note 2: Maybe we should look into getting a block button. Like a actual block a person where you can't see anything from that person. It would be better than ignore where you can still see when someone posts and just have to click "view post" to see it.
I suggested this before and it was supposed to be looked in to.
I suggested this before and it was supposed to be looked in to.
That would be a BIG help.
My problem with the ignore button is, it doesn't work for Mods.
Side note 2: Maybe we should look into getting a block button. Like a actual block a person where you can't see anything from that person. It would be better than ignore where you can still see when someone posts and just have to click "view post" to see it.
I suggested this before and it was supposed to be looked in to.
I suggested this before and it was supposed to be looked in to.
Don't give me that my network is fine, there have been weeks, that this thing moved like the wheels of congress just for me. Others said they had no problems at all.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Also just wanna say 'Thank you' to TIAN for wasting his day in here. Out of all the reds and blues here, I'm glad it was either him (or Kuneff) to reply. I've seen some other mods peeking in here without any replies.
I guess I'm just thinking back years ago when things were settled politely and we didn't need crap like "Miserable Users". But like I said earlier in this thread, the demographics have changed and I know I've fueled dozens of fires over the years.
But don't discredit me just because I'm known to bullshit around here. I always tell it like it and speak my mind... and that's when I'm labeled a troll the most.
Thanks again, TIAN. Hopefully we can keep this a productive thread with more suggestions and ideas.
I guess I'm just thinking back years ago when things were settled politely and we didn't need crap like "Miserable Users". But like I said earlier in this thread, the demographics have changed and I know I've fueled dozens of fires over the years.
But don't discredit me just because I'm known to bullshit around here. I always tell it like it and speak my mind... and that's when I'm labeled a troll the most.
Thanks again, TIAN. Hopefully we can keep this a productive thread with more suggestions and ideas.
Not sure what to tell you
Guest
Posts: n/a
Texas, it appears that when you're MU, you can't hardly access the forum at all. Its reported that one cannot make it into the PM's to even find out what is going on. So if you can click around the forum at all, then you probably aren't MU.
Which is why I tried to bring that up. If someone is having an issue with MU, they can't simply PM a moderator. They can't make it there without 404's and timeouts.
Which is why I tried to bring that up. If someone is having an issue with MU, they can't simply PM a moderator. They can't make it there without 404's and timeouts.
