G37 Coupe V36 2008+ Discussion about the G37 Coupe

what will 0-60 be? in 08 g37

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old May 29, 2007 | 04:19 PM
  #226  
Evil350GT's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
From: AL.
http://www.automobilemag.com/reviews...7_dyno_charts/
 
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2007 | 06:17 PM
  #227  
tat's Avatar
tat
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Car and Driver just tested it at 5.3 seconds 0-60. Too bad because they tested the 07 G35sedan at 5.3 seconds!

That's a screw up! Infiniti should have bumped up the car to do 4.9 seconds and put the 335i and others to shame.
 
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2007 | 06:20 PM
  #228  
Yimbie's Avatar
Yin-Yang and Life
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,149
Likes: 0
From: Apple Valley, CA
Originally Posted by tat
Car and Driver just tested it at 5.3 seconds 0-60. Too bad because they tested the 07 G35sedan at 5.3 seconds!

That's a screw up! Infiniti should have bumped up the car to do 4.9 seconds and put the 335i and others to shame.
omg >< lol... and i thought this thread was dead...

Welcome to the forums, tat. I'm too tired of this subject to even debate it... it has been beaten to death.
 
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2007 | 08:04 PM
  #229  
G37Knight's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
lol average seems to be 5.5
 
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2007 | 12:57 AM
  #230  
Heat's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
From: DFW, TX
Originally Posted by Yimbie
omg >< lol... and i thought this thread was dead...

Welcome to the forums, tat. I'm too tired of this subject to even debate it... it has been beaten to death.
+1, They should ban new topics about performance.
 
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2007 | 07:23 PM
  #231  
RBull's Avatar
Rated M
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 19,619
Likes: 6
From: Nova Scotia, Canada
Premier Member

Originally Posted by Hypnoz
I believe the stock E46 M3's dyno around 265-270whp. The weight difference is negated and they are thus nearly equal hp:weight.

I'd have to do some digging to find which mag actually said it, but if you really want I will. They are all biased. Most towards bimmer.

As I indicated, the M3 is better handling than the 335. The G37 (could be) slightly better handling than the 335, which could bring it close to the M3.

Let's just wait and see. No point in magazine racing for days on end... I can see now why most people don't take part in it.
You're light. 285 is about right.
 
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2007 | 10:48 PM
  #232  
6969g35's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 1
From: FROM BROOKLKN NEW YORK NOW LIVE IN VALENCIA CA.
2003-2006 specs of g35 vey close

Engine : V6, DOHC, front mid-engine RWD
Displacement : 3,498 cc
Valve : 24 valves, 4 valves per cylinder
Transmission : 6-spd manual, 5-spd automanual
Fuel economy : city - 19 mpg
highway - 26 mpg

Suspension : F - Independent multilink
R - Independent lower link A-arm
Brakes : F - Vented discs
R - Solid discs

Horsepower : 280 hp @ 6200 rpm('03-'04),
298 hp @ 6400 rpm('05-'06 manual), 280 hp('05-'06 auto)
Torque : 270 lb-ft @ 4800 rpm('03-'04),
260 lb-ft @ 4800 rpm('05-'06 manual), 270 lb-ft('05-'06 auto)
Redline : 6600 rpm

Top speed : 155 mph(electronically limited)
0-60 mph : 5.6 sec.('03 manual). 6.2 sec.(auto)
0-¼ mile : 14.2 sec @ 100.5 mph('03 manual)
60-0 braking distance : 117 ft
200 ft skidpad : 0.92 g

Curb Weight : 3416 lbs
Overall length : 182.2 in.
Wheelbase : 112.2 in.
Overall Width : 71.5 in.
Height : 54.8 in.
 
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2007 | 06:44 AM
  #233  
muscarel's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by 6969g35
2003-2006 specs of g35 vey close

Engine : V6, DOHC, front mid-engine RWD
Displacement : 3,498 cc
Valve : 24 valves, 4 valves per cylinder
Transmission : 6-spd manual, 5-spd automanual
Fuel economy : city - 19 mpg
highway - 26 mpg

Suspension : F - Independent multilink
R - Independent lower link A-arm
Brakes : F - Vented discs
R - Solid discs

Horsepower : 280 hp @ 6200 rpm('03-'04),
298 hp @ 6400 rpm('05-'06 manual), 280 hp('05-'06 auto)
Torque : 270 lb-ft @ 4800 rpm('03-'04),
260 lb-ft @ 4800 rpm('05-'06 manual), 270 lb-ft('05-'06 auto)
Redline : 6600 rpm

Top speed : 155 mph(electronically limited)
0-60 mph : 5.6 sec.('03 manual). 6.2 sec.(auto)
0-¼ mile : 14.2 sec @ 100.5 mph('03 manual)
60-0 braking distance : 117 ft
200 ft skidpad : 0.92 g

Curb Weight : 3416 lbs
Overall length : 182.2 in.
Wheelbase : 112.2 in.
Overall Width : 71.5 in.
Height : 54.8 in.
Good luck with the above 0-60 and 1/4 mile times. Only one magazine got that. The rest all were mid-14's (14.6) at high 90's. Most people at the track were getting high 14's and many dipped into the 15's. I posted 3 or 4 links into different coupe road tests earlier. 0-60 was usually around 6.0-6.2.
 
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2007 | 03:52 PM
  #234  
da45king's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
04-11-2007, 04:22 AM
da45king
Registered User Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 285
iTrader: (0)

I'm guessing a pesimistic 5.3 0-60 by road & track for the 6mt(5.5 auto)
and 5.5 0-60 for motor trend for (6mt) 5.7 for auto....mt numbers are usually slower.

Magazine testing is flawed. my supposed 5.8 0-60(with simple intake an exhaust with 100k miles on it) car consistently beats the **** out of a 5.3 0-60 car (z).


da45king
View Public Profile
Send a private message to da45king
Find all posts by da45king
Add da45king to Your Buddy List


don't get a cookie for this prediction?
 
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2007 | 04:08 PM
  #235  
UltimateGee27's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,539
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Hypnoz
I believe the stock E46 M3's dyno around 265-270whp. The weight difference is negated and they are thus nearly equal hp:weight.

I'd have to do some digging to find which mag actually said it, but if you really want I will. They are all biased. Most towards bimmer.

As I indicated, the M3 is better handling than the 335. The G37 (could be) slightly better handling than the 335, which could bring it close to the M3.

Let's just wait and see. No point in magazine racing for days on end... I can see now why most people don't take part in it.
why are you guys comparing AN M3 TO G37? M3 is old and has a way smaller motor but still put up impressive numbers (1/4 miles 13.3). I love Infiniti but if you ever drove the last M3 you wouldnt be able to say the G37 is better (M3 is lighter ,faster, and handles better) Only thing the G37 has on a M3 is braking. That M3 was a beast and now that the V8 is coming out OMG.
 
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2007 | 06:43 PM
  #236  
qualitywah's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
slow
 
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2007 | 07:37 AM
  #237  
FAST1's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,090
Likes: 1
That M3 was a beast and now that the V8 is coming out OMG

Actually if you go to the M3 forum, you'll find that the reaction to the E92 M3 by owners of the E46 M3 is more negative than the reaction of G35 owners to the G37. Lots of unhappy M guys. Again the expectations were sky high, and although the result was good, it wasn't spectacular, at least in the minds of many existing M owners.
 
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2007 | 06:58 PM
  #238  
WinglessG's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
whether its 4.9sec 0-60 or more doesn't make me a difference. anyhow when they come up with these specs.. is the spare tire in? what kind of oil? gas? tires? road conditions etc. these things all have to be factored in. i know for sure with someone weighing around 250 they're not going to get 4.9 maybe 5.0 or 5.1 the G is fast enough stock for the money. just drive safe and enjoy the car. i now i will i mostly care about how the car accelerates after 80-90.. my brothers wrx sti acceleration drops to a crawl after hitting 110.. for me thats when it just starts getting interesting. the g37 sounds greater than the g35 at higher rpm.. hopefully will be faster at top end too....
 
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2007 | 07:41 PM
  #239  
GeeWillikers's Avatar
Walking The Fine Line...
Staff Alumni
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 19,883
Likes: 128
From: The Lounge
Premier Member

Originally Posted by WinglessG
whether its 4.9sec 0-60 or more doesn't make me a difference. anyhow when they come up with these specs.. is the spare tire in? what kind of oil? gas? tires? road conditions etc. these things all have to be factored in. i know for sure with someone weighing around 250 they're not going to get 4.9 maybe 5.0 or 5.1 the G is fast enough stock for the money. just drive safe and enjoy the car. i now i will i mostly care about how the car accelerates after 80-90.. my brothers wrx sti acceleration drops to a crawl after hitting 110.. for me thats when it just starts getting interesting. the g37 sounds greater than the g35 at higher rpm.. hopefully will be faster at top end too....
And where do you exercise these feats of strength?


.......that's what I thought.

 
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2007 | 01:59 AM
  #240  
bubbletea 4 me's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 586
Likes: 0
From: Northern VA
slow..
 
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:48 PM.