Intake & Exhaust Questions and info regarding various aftermatket exhaust systems for the G35 (Headers,Y-Pipes, and Cat-Back Systems)

The NA debate is over. bigger exhaust = more power

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 12:38 PM
  #1  
Andrei's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,771
Likes: 21
From: Lawrenceville, GA
The NA debate is over. bigger exhaust = more power

This is going to be hard to swallow for a lot of people here so I am STILL expecting denial, which is the most predictable response here.
This car has 3" headers merging into a single 3.5" exhaust. A 2.5" dual exhaust was tried which made less horsepower.
Even when the motor was stock with only an intake and dual 3" headers and 3.5" single it still made more power than stock. 279whp http://my350z.com/forum/na-builds/39...-roadster.html
It got to a 327whp with a stock motor and more boltons. http://my350z.com/forum/na-builds/47...ideo-pics.html

Since I am using stock headers which have only 2" collectors and test pipes that are 2.5" with divorced 3" singles I have more backpressure then that car BUT still make more power over stock or a 2.5" dual exhaust.
http://my350z.com/forum/na-builds/50...ml#post8821049

Originally Posted by SGSash
There have been a few parts that have LOST power, that have been removed (ported heads), (dual 2.5" exhaust with a terrible h-pipe), so we've found out what really does and doesn't work.

 
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 01:49 PM
  #2  
MM_G3520's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
From: Northeast
Then I'm really screwed, my Borla is only 2.25in duals, I think. Sounds great with that X-Pipe though
 
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 01:52 PM
  #3  
Bestswat's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,159
Likes: 1
From: Long Island, New York
You mean bigger exhaust with headers and cams and a spacer and a 3" intake and so on to fill up the increased volume. Thennn it all makes sense but a bigger exhaust alone? Never.
 
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 02:27 PM
  #4  
Higrev's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
From: SoCal Irvine
I agree.. if you have all those other upgrades then it would make more power. But can't say for a stock car to go 3inch all the way will give you more power... =/
 
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 02:35 PM
  #5  
ajcool2's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 209
Likes: 1
From: Baltimore
I beleive it and seen it many times on VQ35de's.
 
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 03:02 PM
  #6  
NNOCENT's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (25)
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 4,064
Likes: 17
From: Baltimore
aj update you sig foo
 
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 03:46 PM
  #7  
Andrei's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,771
Likes: 21
From: Lawrenceville, GA
Who here can name one stock Revup (350z or G35) with an intake, 2.5" headers with a dual 2.5" exhaust that made more power than this stock Revup with 3" headers, single 3.5" exhaust and an intake? http://my350z.com/forum/na-builds/39...-roadster.html

There are none even though there have been plenty of people with 2.5" headers and 2.5" exhaust + an intake on a stock motor.
 
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 04:06 PM
  #8  
DaveB's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,573
Likes: 72
From: Kansas City
I think the debate is FAR from over. What you're saying really doesn't make and sense and you're trying to apply way to many variables to argue your opinion as fact.

Go to the strip and get 5+ runs. Record density air conditions and correct ET/MPH for DA.

Put the stock exhaust on and go back to the strip and get 5+ runs. Record density air conditions and correct ET/MPH for DA.

Compare MPH results. If the car is consistently over 1mph faster with the 3" exhaust, then you validate your claim that the 3" exhaust is making more power.
 
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 04:07 PM
  #9  
DaveB's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,573
Likes: 72
From: Kansas City
Originally Posted by Andrei
Who here can name one stock Revup (350z or G35) with an intake, 2.5" headers with a dual 2.5" exhaust that made more power than this stock Revup with 3" headers, single 3.5" exhaust and an intake? http://my350z.com/forum/na-builds/39...-roadster.html

There are none even though there have been plenty of people with 2.5" headers and 2.5" exhaust + an intake on a stock motor.
Did they test a Revup an intake, 2.5" headers with a dual 2.5" exhaust on THIS dyno and compare the two? If not, your argument has NO basis.
 
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 04:19 PM
  #10  
rcdash's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 32
From: NC
Andrei, you need to read a little more and verbalize a little less - or at least try asking questions when you really are not sure... If you read a little more about exhaust theory and you will learn that piping size is just one variable. SGSash has posted some nice threads, so thanks for the links to those, I guess...
 
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 04:22 PM
  #11  
Jairen's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,544
Likes: 150
From: Bremerton, Wa
I knew about that LTH header design. I was all for it until I saw the price. If I had the cash, I'd have them right now. Quality looks on point and I don't doubt the gains. This header and exhaust design alone would would probably put the REVUP over the Non-REVUP with cams and bolt-ons and into HR territory.

So far as for our exhausts, bigger is better without a doubt to an extent. That's one of the reasons I went with the X02 over the HKS due to it's bigger piping diameter at a cheaper price.

The only thing I don't see in that build is a merge. I still haven't seen how merges such as x-pipes and h-pipes effect the VQ with a true dual. No factual dyno's to prove the myth over no merge vs x-pipes vs h-pipes.

Here's some more good info done by Motordyne themselves on exhaust testing. Pretty good read. http://my350z.com/forum/intake-exhau...ml#post7412469
 
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 04:36 PM
  #12  
Jeff92se's Avatar
Red Card Crew
iTrader: (24)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 37,810
Likes: 585
From: ɐʍ 'ǝlʇʇɐǝs
Premier Member

H and X pipes help the scavenging effect to help promote higher exhaust gas velocities (which is what everyone really wants here).

One side will "pull" the exhuast from the other side and vice versa.
 
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 05:10 PM
  #13  
Jairen's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,544
Likes: 150
From: Bremerton, Wa
Originally Posted by Jeff92se
H and X pipes help the scavenging effect to help promote higher exhaust gas velocities (which is what everyone really wants here).

One side will "pull" the exhuast from the other side and vice versa.
Of course we know the scavenging effects of merge pipes but the question is how they effect the VQ in relation to the distance from the engine to the merge. In other words, X and H pipes may even have no effects if put too far down stream or up stream. Still haven't seen a specific VQ x-pipe/h-pipe dyno.
 
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 05:18 PM
  #14  
Jeff92se's Avatar
Red Card Crew
iTrader: (24)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 37,810
Likes: 585
From: ɐʍ 'ǝlʇʇɐǝs
Premier Member

Correct. When I put my X pipe on to my borla (that has no X or H), I tried to see where the best place would be (within reason). I researched where Motordyne put there Y merger and where Stillen puts there X pipes.
 
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 05:19 PM
  #15  
Glex25's Avatar
Administrator
iTrader: (19)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 4,654
Likes: 75
From: New Jersey
One thing I have noticed working on these cars

Yes you can get more horsepower out of breathing mods and the correct tuning
but you will always lose out on TQ if you go that route
 
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:53 PM.