2.5" or 3.0"
#1
2.5" or 3.0"
I tried to do a search, but, it doesn't recognize 2.5" or 3"; so, all it searches for is inch. I'm planning on a system close to the Magnaflow system, just running pipe back to a Flowmaster or Magnaflow muffler. With the only mods being 5/16" spacer, Z tube, K&N and Megan HR style Y-Pipe what would be better. 2.5" or 3". I don't plan on doing any mods later on.
#3
#5
#6
Exactly. You want a similar diameter all the through. 3 -> 2.5 will create rasp.
I think mixed up the stock diameter of 2.5.
The stock cats are 2.25in. It's exactly the reason I have a 2.25in dual exhaust
A lot of people go for 2.5in test pipes/ HFCs, when in fact they should be using the same diameter as their y pipe or x pipe in my case. Then they wonder where the massive amount of rasp came from.
I think mixed up the stock diameter of 2.5.
The stock cats are 2.25in. It's exactly the reason I have a 2.25in dual exhaust
A lot of people go for 2.5in test pipes/ HFCs, when in fact they should be using the same diameter as their y pipe or x pipe in my case. Then they wonder where the massive amount of rasp came from.
#7
Trending Topics
#9
Why? His Megan Y-Pipe is at 3" exit, leaving the 2.5" mid will create turbulence at the merge. It would be best to swap to 3" mid + axle back and swap to HFC. It will shift the power curve higher in the rpm's, but a tune will help create some power in the lower rpm. if he wants to stay at 2.5" then ye should sell the Megan Y and get an OEM HR-Y.