Plenum Spacer vs. Manifold Spacer
#1
Plenum Spacer vs. Manifold Spacer
I was initially looking into thermal gaskets for the manifold when I stumbled across the 1/4" thermal manifold spacers. Haven't seen much about those on any of the forums and it doesn't seem many people run them. For the price of a plenum spacer I could pretty much get a 5pc kit with manifold upper and lower collector spacers, intake manifold spacer, and throttle collector spacer. (Something along these lines: http://www.nwpengineering.com/Phenolic_Spacers.html) Motordyne also makes a spacer that runs around $80. It seems like that should do pretty much the same thing as a regular plenum spacer, lengthening the runners, and there would be less chance of running into a warping issue from torquing the plenum.
Why is it that nobody runs these, is there something I'm missing? What are some opinions on this matter?
Why is it that nobody runs these, is there something I'm missing? What are some opinions on this matter?
#3
According to the Nissan website they are the same part number, part numbers can be seen in attached images. In addition, motordyne offers one as well:
http://www.thenismoshop.com/MOTORDYN...5DE_p_435.html
I did my research. It seems like this may even be better than a Plenum spacer because if a thermal manifold spacer is used it will cut down on heat closer to the source. I'd love to hear from anyone that has this, otherwise maybe I'll give it a shot and write a review when I get some disposable cash. (Poor college kid status ftl)
http://www.thenismoshop.com/MOTORDYN...5DE_p_435.html
I did my research. It seems like this may even be better than a Plenum spacer because if a thermal manifold spacer is used it will cut down on heat closer to the source. I'd love to hear from anyone that has this, otherwise maybe I'll give it a shot and write a review when I get some disposable cash. (Poor college kid status ftl)
#5
From what I understand runner length has a large part to do with why the plenum spacer is installed. While a spacer on the plenum may add some capacity, it seems that the runners can only pull the air so fast since everything is running at a constant pressure. Unless there is forced induction involved the added air capacity shouldn't effect anything the way I understand it. Polishing the lower plenum ports in addition the lengthening the runners could help with smoothing out the airflow but I don't see any real advantage to the spacer on the plenum rather than the manifold because essentially the runners would gain length either way.
I realize this car has been out for almost 14 years and the plenum spacer is the 'go to' mod, but really I was just wondering why. I'm not saying I'm right or you're wrong by any means, you could be 100% correct. I just wondered if anyone had one because, from the way I understand the fluid dynamics, it should prove to be about the same performance wise and it doesn't seem like anybody takes the manifold route.
I realize this car has been out for almost 14 years and the plenum spacer is the 'go to' mod, but really I was just wondering why. I'm not saying I'm right or you're wrong by any means, you could be 100% correct. I just wondered if anyone had one because, from the way I understand the fluid dynamics, it should prove to be about the same performance wise and it doesn't seem like anybody takes the manifold route.
#6
Premier Member
iTrader: (11)
From what I understand runner length has a large part to do with why the plenum spacer is installed. While a spacer on the plenum may add some capacity, it seems that the runners can only pull the air so fast since everything is running at a constant pressure. Unless there is forced induction involved the added air capacity shouldn't effect anything the way I understand it. Polishing the lower plenum ports in addition the lengthening the runners could help with smoothing out the airflow but I don't see any real advantage to the spacer on the plenum rather than the manifold because essentially the runners would gain length either way.
I realize this car has been out for almost 14 years and the plenum spacer is the 'go to' mod, but really I was just wondering why. I'm not saying I'm right or you're wrong by any means, you could be 100% correct. I just wondered if anyone had one because, from the way I understand the fluid dynamics, it should prove to be about the same performance wise and it doesn't seem like anybody takes the manifold route.
I realize this car has been out for almost 14 years and the plenum spacer is the 'go to' mod, but really I was just wondering why. I'm not saying I'm right or you're wrong by any means, you could be 100% correct. I just wondered if anyone had one because, from the way I understand the fluid dynamics, it should prove to be about the same performance wise and it doesn't seem like anybody takes the manifold route.
The VQ35DE "Rev-Up" engine has a different lower plenum design and doesn't suffer air starvation that regular (or non-revup) engines have. The rev-up plenum has its own flaws, mainly due to shorter runners and thus loss of torque, but has better flow near the rev-up's higher redline.
The intake spacers in your first post apply to FWD VQ35 engines that have a different intake design that doesn't apply to the RWD engines. (Apples and Oranges)
The manifold spacer from motordyne is really just to provide clearance for aftermarket injectors. In theory the rev-up engine might see some gains from the runner lengthening, but simply swapping on a non-revup lower plenum yield such good gains that a measly 1/4" spacer seems like a waste of time.
#7
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
thechitoguy
G35 Sedan V35 2003-06
12
10-01-2015 05:25 PM