OFFICIAL: Aggressive Wheel fitment FLUSH/STRETCH sedan

Subscribe
Sep 8, 2010 | 10:57 PM
  #1906  
General uhp 225/35 235/35 There wasnt as much stretch as i had expected. I like the way it looks. If my specs havent changed i am still at around -2 camber all around. I will pull just a tad in the rear and mayb dial it to 3 or just pull more. We will see
Reply 0
Sep 8, 2010 | 10:57 PM
  #1907  
Reminds me of Ken Block's wheels... I like
Reply 0
Sep 9, 2010 | 12:46 AM
  #1908  
I just came from an s2000 platform. I've been searching for a couple weeks and I can't seem to find what I'm looking for on a sedan. I'm looking to purchase Work s1's in bbf finish. I did like the dpe fitment on g35papa's car, but I believe I would like to go a bit more aggressive. How similar are offsets for the G compared to a 2nd gen IS? I have a couple setups in mind. First, 19x8.5 +29, 19x10 +42, or 19x9 +22, 19x10.5 +36. I'm sure a roll and stretch will be needed. I don't mind running a little camber either. Can anyone chime in?
Reply 0
Sep 9, 2010 | 12:54 AM
  #1909  
^ those specs aren't very aggressive.

Our offsets are somewhat close to 2 gen IS, but not exactly the same.

Our front fenders are basically the same as 350z our rears however are kinda weak.

Both the specs you mention won't need a big stretch at all, just a mild roll and natural camber.

I'm running 19x9 +5 and 19x10 +17 on my current set up and I am pretty equal poke and I'm poking probably just under an inch out of the fender. -2.5ish rear and =1.9ish front. Rear has mild roll and front is untouched.

Just to give you an idea, ignore the photos random

Name:  nextmod39.jpg
Views: 126
Size:  80.6 KB

This was after a mis hap, no 5mm spacer on the front so it was 19x9 +10 for this.
Name:  infiniti_green2.jpg
Views: 85
Size:  91.4 KB


Reply 0
Sep 9, 2010 | 01:03 AM
  #1910  
what tire sizes are you running on that setup? ^^^^
Reply 0
Sep 9, 2010 | 01:07 AM
  #1911  
215/35 front and 225/35 rear
Reply 0
Sep 9, 2010 | 10:01 AM
  #1912  
I envy those of you who are aggresive yet run -3 or less camber. With springs, I need to run -3 to -3.3 for 8.5 +15
Reply 0
Sep 9, 2010 | 04:31 PM
  #1913  
Im only running -2 LMAO
Reply 0
Sep 9, 2010 | 04:47 PM
  #1914  
^ yea but you have a more aggressive pull dont you?
Reply 0
Sep 9, 2010 | 04:55 PM
  #1915  
Yessir
Reply 0
Sep 9, 2010 | 05:06 PM
  #1916  
Damn 4dgs you got those SMA's lookin proper
Reply 0
Sep 9, 2010 | 05:52 PM
  #1917  
Quote: Im only running -2 LMAO
haha....I hate you.
Reply 0
Sep 9, 2010 | 05:57 PM
  #1918  
Quote: ^ yea but you have a more aggressive pull dont you?
and stiffer spring rates/dampening as well.
Reply 0
Sep 9, 2010 | 06:01 PM
  #1919  
back when i had sf winnings i was running 3.8
Reply 0
Sep 9, 2010 | 09:55 PM
  #1920  
Some new pics of Cliff's (dznuts) setup. Painted his wheels again.

Read what the photog said about how low he is:

"“How does he not scrape on everything?”

The answer… they do. Heading home from the photo-shoot at close to midnight, we saw Cliff’s car shooting sparks just riding down the road. That’s right, shooting sparks on a static suspension, and one that he daily drives. It’s just amazing to see these cars pull off such tire-eating camber and bug scraping ride height and drive them like there is nothing to see.

And its quite obvious he takes this to heart. His daily driver is something most would have as a garage queen. But, as Cliff hit’s a small dip in the road on the ride home, I look over as I hear the crunch and he’s just smiling, asking “Is it shooting some good sparks?”



Reply 0